Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 637–654 | Cite as

Effect of alkali and silane surface treatments on regenerated cellulose fibre type (Lyocell) intended for composites

  • Sunil Kumar Ramamoorthy
  • Mikael Skrifvars
  • Marja Rissanen
Original Paper

Abstract

Cellulose fibres have significant importance and potential for polymer reinforcement. It is essential to modify the surface of the fibre to obtain good fibre-matrix interface. Surface treatments can increase surface roughness of the fibre, change its chemical composition and introduce new moieties that can effectively interlock with the matrix, resulting in good mechanical properties in the composites. This is mainly due to improved fibre-matrix adhesion. The treatments may also reduce the water absorption rate by converting part of the hydroxyl groups on the fibre surface into other functional groups. Chemical modification of the surface of a regenerated cellulose fibre of the Lyocell type was carried out by alkali and silane treatments, which significantly changed the properties of the Lyocell fibres. Three parameters were considered when the fibre surface treatment was done: concentration (2–15 wt%), temperature (25 and 50 °C) and time (30 min–72 h). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy were used for chemical analysis and qualitative analysis of the cellulose crystallinity due to the surface treatments; subsequently, mechanical strength of the fibres was tested by tensile testing. Weight loss, moisture regain and swelling measurements were taken before and after treatments, which showed the obvious changes in fibre properties on treatment. Heat capacity of the fibres was measured for untreated and treated fibres, and thermal degradation of fibres was examined to see the stability of fibres at elevated temperatures. Wettability and surface energies were measured using dynamic contact angle method in three wetting mediums. Scanning electron microscopy was used to study the morphological properties of the fibres.

Keywords

Surface modification Fibre Alkali Silane Lyocell Cellulose 

References

  1. Abu-Rous M, Varga K, Bechtold T, Schuster KC (2007) A new method to visualize and characterize the pore structure of TENCEL® (Lyocell) and other man-made cellulosic fibers using fluorescent dye molecular probe. J Appl Polym Sci 106:2083–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal R, Saxena NS, Sharma KB, Thomas S, Sreekala MS (2000) Activation energy and crystallization kinetics of untreated and treated oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Mater Sci Eng 277:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal R, Saxena NS, Sharma KB, Thomas S, Pothan LA (2006) Thermal conduction and diffusion through polyester composites. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 44:746–750Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez VA, Ruscekaite RA, Vazquez A (2003) Mechanical properties and water absorption behaviour of composites made from a biodegradable matrix and alkaline-treated sisal fibres. J Compos Mater 37:1575–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amash A, Zugenmaier P (2000) Morphology and properties of isotropic and oriented samples of cellulose fibre–polypropylene composites. Polymer 41:1589–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behzad T, Sain M (2007) Measurement and prediction of thermal conductivity of hemp fibre reinforced composites. Polym Eng Sci 47:977–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biganska O (2002) Etude physic-chimique des solutions de cellulose dans la N-Methylmorpholine-N-Oxyde, PhD Thesis, L’Ecole Nationale des Mines de Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  8. Chae DW, Choi KR, Kim BC (2003) Effect of cellulose pulp type on the mercerizing behavior and physical properties of lyocell fibres. Text Res J. doi: 10.1177/004051750307300613 Google Scholar
  9. Colom X, Carrillo F (2002) Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibres by caustic treatment. Eur Polym J 38:2225–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colom X, Carrillo F, Moratalla G, Nogues F (2001) Modificacion del grado de cristalinidad en fibras de celulosa regenerada sometidas a un proceso de mercerizado 1:29–38Google Scholar
  11. Debnath S, Wunder SL, McCool JI, Baran GR (2003) Silane treatment effects on glass/resin interfacial shear strengths. Dent Mater 19:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edeerozey AMM, Akil HM, Azhar AB, Ariffin MIZ (2007) Chemical modification of kenaf fibres. Mater Lett 61:2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fink HP, Weigel P, Purz HJ, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci 26:1473–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fink HP, Ganster J, Lehmann A (2014) Progress in cellulose shaping: 20 years industrial case studies at Fraunhofer IAP. Cellulose 21:31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganster J, Fink HP (2006) Novel cellulose fibre reinforced thermoplastic materials. Cellulose 13:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ganster J, Fink HP, Pinnow M (2006) High-tenacity man-made cellulose fibre reinforced thermoplastics–injection moulding compounds with polypropylene and alternative matrices. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:1796–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gassan J, Bledzki AK (1999) Possibilities of improving the mechanical properties of jute/epoxy composites by alkali treatment of fibres. Compos Sci Technol 59:1303–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry: functionalization of cellulose. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaturapiree A, Manian AP, Bechtold T (2006) Sorption studies on regenerated cellulosic fibers in salt-alkali mixtures. Cellulose 13:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. John MJ, Anandjiwala RD (2008) Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 29:187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson RK, Zink-Sharp A, Renneckar SH, Glasser WG (2008) Mechanical properties of wetlaid lyocell and hybrid fiber-reinforced composites with polypropylene. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:470–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F, Aravinthan T (2012) Mechcanical properties of chemically-treated hemp fibre reinforced sandwich composites. Compos Part B Eng 43:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klemm D, Philipp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:2–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolpak FJ, Blackwell J (1976) Determination of the structure of cellulose II. Macromolecules 9:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krässig HA (1993) Cellulose: structure, accessibility and reactivity. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindqvist J, Malmström E (2006) Surface modification of natural substrates by atom transfer radical polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 100:4155–4162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manian AP, Abu-Rous M, Lenninger M, Roeder T, Schuster KC, Bechtold T (2008) The influence of alkali pretreatments in lyocell resin finishing-fiber structure. Carbohydr Polym 71:664–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interf 8:313–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohanty S, Verma SK, Nayak SK (2006) Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of MAPE treated jute/HDPE composites. Compos Sci Technol 66:538–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (2002) Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci 84:2222–2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nada AAMA, Kamel S, El-Sakhawy M (2000) Thermal behavior and infrared spectroscopy of cellulose carbamates. Polym Degrad Stab 70:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type. Part II. A new infrared ratio for estimation of crystallinity in cellulose I and II. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1325–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Connor RT, DuPre EF, Mitcham D (1958) Applications of infrared absorption spectroscopy to investigations of cotton and modified cottons: Part I: physical and crystalline modifications and oxidation. Text Res J 28:382–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Okubayashi S, Bechtold T (2005) Alkali uptake and swelling behaviour of lyocell fiber and their effects on crosslinking reaction. Cellulose 12:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oubani H, Abbas A, Harris A (2011) Investigation on the mechanical pretreatment of cellulose by high intensity ultrasound and ball milling. Chemeca 2011. Engineering a Better World: Sydney Hilton Hotel, Australia, 18–21 September 2011, 1765Google Scholar
  38. Park JM, Quang ST, Hwang BS, DeVries KL (2006) Interfacial evaluation of modified jute and hemp fibers/polypropylene (PP)-maleic anhydride polypropylene copolymers (PP-MAPP) composites using micromechanical technique and non-destructive acoustic emission. Compos Sci Technol 66:2686–2699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Persin Z, Stana-Kleinschek K, Sfiligoj-Smole M, Kre T, Ribitsch V (2004) Determining the surface free energy of cellulose materials with the powder contact angle method. Text Res J 74:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramamoorthy SK, Di Q, Adekunle K, Skrifvars M (2012) Effect of water absorption on mechanical properties of soybean oil thermosets reinforced with natural fibers. J Reinf Plast Compos 31:1191–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramamoorthy SK, Kundu CK, Adekunle K, Bashir T, Skrifvars M (2013) Properties of green composites with regenerated cellulose fiber and soybean-based thermoset for technical applications. J Reinf Plast Compos. doi: 10.1177/0731684413504325 Google Scholar
  42. Ray D, Sarkar BK (2001) Characterization of alkali-treated jute fibers for physical and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 80:1013–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Röder T, Moosbauer J, Fasching M, Bohn A, Fink HP, Baldinger T, Sixta H (2006) Crytallinity determination of man-made cellulose fibers–comparison of analytical methods. Lenzing Ber 86:132–136Google Scholar
  44. Rodriguez ES, Stefani PM, Vazquez A (2007) Effects of fibers’ alkali treatment on the resin transfer molding processing and mechanical properties of jute-vinylester composites. J Compos Mater 41:1729–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y, Yang GC, Zeng HM (2001) The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:1437–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seavey KC, Ghosh I, Davis RM, Glasser WG (2001) Continuous cellulose fiber-reinforced cellulose ester composites I. Manufacturing options. Cellulose 8:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silva GG, De Souza DA, Machado JC, Hourston DJ (2000) Mechanical and thermal characterization of native brazilian coir fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 76:1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siroka B, Noisternig M, Griesser UJ, Bechtold T (2008) Characterization of cellulosic fibers and fabrics by sorption/desorption. Carbohydr Res 343:2194–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stankovic S, Popovic D, Poparic GB (2008) Thermal properties of textile fabrics made of natural and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polym Test 27:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999) Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber-matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng 30:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vu-Manh H, Özturk HB, Bechtold T (2010) Swelling and dissolution mechanism of lyocell fiber in aqueous alkaline solution containing ferric tartaric acid complex. Cellulose 17:521–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang Y, Tong B, Hou S, Li M, Shen C (2011) Transcrystallization behaviour at the poly (lactic acid)/sisal fibre biocomposite interface. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zampaloni M, Pourboghrat F, Yankovich SA, Rodgers BN, Moore J, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2007) Kenaf natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: a discussion on manufacturing problems and solutions. Compos Part A 38:1569–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zugenmaier P (2001) Conformation and packing of various crystalline cellulose fibers. Prog Polym Sci 26:1341–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zugenmaier P (2008) Crystalline cellulose and derivatives: characterization and structures. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sunil Kumar Ramamoorthy
    • 1
  • Mikael Skrifvars
    • 1
  • Marja Rissanen
    • 2
  1. 1.Swedish Centre for Resource RecoveryUniversity of BoråsBoråsSweden
  2. 2.Department of Materials ScienceTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations