Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 385–395 | Cite as

The effect of xylan on the fibrillation efficiency of DED bleached soda bagasse pulp and on nanopaper characteristics

  • Seyed Rahman Djafari Petroudy
  • Ali Ghasemian
  • Hossein Resalati
  • Kristin Syverud
  • Gary Chinga-Carrasco
Original Paper

Abstract

Xylan is the second most abundant polysaccharide and the most abundant hemicellulose component of soda bagasse pulp. In this study, bleached soda bagasse pulp (SB) and bleached bagasse dissolving pulp (DB) with varying amounts of xylan were fibrillated with a homogenization process. The produced fibrillated materials were used for making nanopaper structures. The surface, physical, mechanical and optical properties of the nanopaper were measured, and the effect of xylan was assessed. Laser profilometry (LP) and field emission scanning electron microscopy were applied to study the degree of the fibrillation. The pulp having the highest xylan content, SB, showed the highest yield of cellulose nanofibrils. Nanopaper produced from SB had a more consolidated structure than that produced from DB. Additionally, SB nanopaper yielded higher tensile strength, lower LP roughness, a higher barrier against oxygen and lower opacity. These results indicate a higher degree of fibrillation of the SB pulp compared to the DB pulp. Hence, the positive effect of xylan for facilitating the fibrillation of the starting pulp fibers was demonstrated.

Keywords

Bagasse Xylan Homogenization Bleached bagasse dissolving pulp Nanopaper Laser profilometry Field emission scanning electron microscopy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) for its financial support through a fellowship. We would like to acknowledge PFI technicians for their skillful laboratory work. The authors also thank Prof. Øyvind Weiby Gregersen and Dr. Philip André Reme for their valuable collaboration.

References

  1. Bhaduri SK, Ghosh IN, Deb Sarkar NL (1995) Ramie hemicellulose as beater additive in papermaking from jute-stick kraft pulp. Ind Crops Prod 4(2):79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chinga G, Johnssen PO, Dougherty R, Lunden-Berli E, Walter J (2007) Quantification of the 3-D micro-structure of SC surfaces. J Microsc-Oxford 227(3):254–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chinga-Carrasco G (2013) Optical methods for the quantification of the fibrillation degree of bleached MFC materials. Micron 48:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinga-Carrasco G, Syverud K (2012) On the structure and oxygen transmission rate of biodegradable cellulose nanobarriers. Nanoscale Res Lett 7:192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chinga-Carrasco G, Yu Y, Diserud O (2011) Quantitative electron microscopy of cellulose nanofibril structures from Eucalyptus and Pinus radiate kraft pulp fibres. Microsc Microanal 17:563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chinga-Carrasco G, Averianova N, Kodalenko O, Garaeva M, Petrov V, Leinsvang B, Karlsen T (2014) The effect of residual fibres on the micro-topography of cellulose nanopaper. Micron 56:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun SJ, Lee SY, Doh GH, Lee S, K JH (2011) Preparation of ultrastrength nanopapers using cellulose nanofibrils. J Ind Eng Chem 17:521–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillen S, Noreus S (1968) Kraft pulping with recirculation of cooking liquor containing hemicellulose. Sven Papperstidn 71(15):509–514Google Scholar
  9. Djafari Petroudy SR, Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Ghasemian A, Resalati H (2014) Effects of bagasse microfibril lated cellulose and cationicpolyacrylamide on key properties of bagasse paper. Carbohydr Polym 99:311–318Google Scholar
  10. Duchesne I, Hult EL, Molin U, Daniel G, Iversen T, Lennholm H (2001) The influence of hemicellulose on fibril aggregation of kraft pulp fibres as revealed by FE-SEM and CP/MAS 13C-NMR. Cellulose 8:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. English B, Chow P, Bajwa D (1997) Processing into composites. In: Rowell MR, Young RA, Rowell JK (eds) Paper and composites from agro-based resources. CRC Lewis Publishers, New York, pp 269–297Google Scholar
  12. Ferrer A, Flipponen L, Rodríguez A, Laine J, Rojas JO (2012) Valorization of residual empty palm fruit bunch fibres (EPFBF) by microfluidization: production of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresour Technol 125:249–255Google Scholar
  13. Gomes JV, Longue JD, Colodette LJ, Ribeiro AR (2014) The effect of eucalypt pulp xylan content on its bleachability, refinability and drainability. Cellulose 21:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González I, Alcalá M, Chinga-Carrasco G, Vilaseca F, Boufi S, Mutjé P (2014) From paper to nanopaper: evolution of mechanical and physical properties. Cellulose 21:2599–2609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassan EA, Hassan ML, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated from xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fibre Sci 43(1):76–82Google Scholar
  16. Hassan ML, Bras J, Hassan EA, Bruzesse C, Mauret E (2014) Enzyme-assisted isolation of microfibrillated cellulose from date palm fruit stalks. Ind Crops Prod 55:102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hult EL, Iversen T, Sugiyama J (2003) Characterization of the supermolecular structure of cellulose in wood pulp fibres. Cellulose 10:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The Effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofibre network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 9:1022–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jafari-Petroudy SR, Resalati H, RezayatiCharani P (2011) Newsprint from soda bagasse pulp in admixture of hardwood CMP pulp. Bioresources 6(3):2483–2491Google Scholar
  20. Leopold B, McIntosh DC (1961) Chemical composition and physical properties of wood fibres. III. Tensile strength of individual fibres from alkali-extracted loblolly pine holocellulose. TAPPI 44(3):235–240Google Scholar
  21. Miettinen A, Chinga-Carrasco G, Kataja M (2014) Three-dimensional microstructural properties of nanofibrillated cellulose films. Int J Mol Sci 15:6423–6440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molin U, Teder A (2002) Importance of cellulose/hemicellulose-ratio for pulp strength. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 17(1):14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mörseburg K, Chinga-Carrasco G (2009) Assessing the combined benefits of clay and nanofibrillated cellulose in layered TMP-based sheets. Cellulose 16(5):795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8(6):1931–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peng XW, Ren JL, Zhong LX, Sun RC (2011) Nanocomposite films based on xylan-rich hemicelluloses and cellulose nanofibres with enhanced mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules 12(9):3321–3329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pettersson SE, Rydholm SA (1961) Hemicelluloses and paper properties of birch pulps. III. Sven Papperstidn 64:4–17Google Scholar
  27. Rydholm SA (1965) Pulping processes. Interscience Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7(6):1687–1691Google Scholar
  29. Saxena A, Elder JT, Kenvin J, Ragauskas JA (2011) High oxygen nanocomposite barrier films based on xylan and nanocrystalline cellulose. Nano Micro Lett 2:235–245Google Scholar
  30. Schonberg C, Oksanen T, Suurnakki A, Kettunen H, Buchert J (2001) The importance of xylan for the strength properties of spruce kraft pulp fibres. Holzforschung 55(6):639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheikhi P, Talaeipour M, Homan Hemasi A, Kademi Eslam H, Gumuskaya E (2010) Effect of drying and chemical treatment on bagasse soda pulp properties during recycling. Bioresources 5(3):1702–1716Google Scholar
  32. Sihtola H, Kyrklund B, Laamanen L, Palenius I (1963) Comparison and conversion of viscosity and DP-values determined by different methods, vol 4. Helsinki, Finland: Paperija Puu, pp 225–232Google Scholar
  33. Sjoblom K (1988) Extended delignification in kraft cooking through improved selectivity Part 3. The effect of dissolved xylan on pulp yield. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 3(1):34–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-51042618Google Scholar
  35. Stevanic JS, Bergstrom EM, Gatenholm P, Berglund L, Salmen L (2012) Arabinoxylan/nanofibrillated cellulose composite films. J Mater Sci 47(18):6724–6732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Subramaniyan S, Prema P (2002) Biotechnology of microbial xylanases: enzymology, molecular biology and application. Crit Rev Biotechnol 22(1):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strenght and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16(1):75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci 37:815–827Google Scholar
  39. Yang Q, Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A, Zhang L (2011) Transparent cellulose films with high gas barrier properties fabricated from aqueous alkali/urea solutions. Biomacromolecules 12:2766–2771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Young R (1997) Processing of agro-based resources into pulp and paper. In: Rowell MR, Young RA, Rowell JK (eds) Paper and composites from agro-based resources. CRC Lewis Publishers, New York, pp 137–245Google Scholar
  41. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79(4):1086–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seyed Rahman Djafari Petroudy
    • 1
  • Ali Ghasemian
    • 2
  • Hossein Resalati
    • 3
  • Kristin Syverud
    • 4
    • 5
  • Gary Chinga-Carrasco
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Cellulose and Paper Technology, Faculty of New Technologies and Energy EngineeringShahid Beheshti University (SBU)TehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Pulp and Paper Industries, Faculty of Wood and Paper EngineeringGorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (GAU)GorganIran
  3. 3.Department of Wood and Paper Sciences and Technology, Natural Resources FacultySari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (SANRU)SariIran
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  5. 5.Paper and Fibre Research Institute (PFI)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations