Bacterial cellulose films: influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties
- 910 Downloads
Structural properties of bacterial cellulose (BC) depend on the microstructure of the material, which in turn is influenced by the bacterial strain. This paper reports the production of BC thin films from two bacterial strains, gluconacetobacter xylinus (GX) and gluconacetobacter europaeus (GE), and three methods of drying the films; at room temperature, freeze drying and supercritical drying. The porosity, transparency, water absorption capacity (WAC) and mechanical properties of the obtained films are further investigated. We conclude that materials with different properties can be fabricated by selecting the bacterial strain or the drying method. Supercritical drying of films of GE achieved mechanically robust and extremely light films, 0.05 g/mL, with up to 96 % of porosity, and with a WAC up 110 times their dried weight. We determined that materials resulting from GE strain are not much affected by the drying method. On the other hand, GX produced BC films more sensitive to the drying method used. Films are denser, 0.6–0.2 g/mL, with tunable porosity from 60 to 90 % and their maximum WAC is 66 times their dried weight.
KeywordsBacterial cellulose Films Transparent Bacterial strain Water adsorbent
The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement no 303630 and cofounded by the European Social Fund. Authors acknowledge the funding from Spanish Ministry of Economy MAT 2012-35324, from the Generalitat de Catalunya 2014SGR213, COST Action MP1202, Ramon y Cajal grant RYC-2010-06082 (AL), and Chinese Scholarship Council fellowship (MZ). The group of Dr. Alex Peralvarez for their help in the bacterial culture, Dr. Josep PuigMartí and the group of Prof. David Amabilino for the use of the optical microscope, Prof. Elies Molins and Toni Pons for the use and training in the use of the freeze drier and Dr. Roberto L. Guzman de Villoria for his advices in the mechanical measurements.
- Andrés Barrao C, Falquet L, Calderon Copete S, Descombes P, Perez R, Ortega Pérez R, Barja F (2011) Genome sequences of the high-acetic acid-resistant bacteria Gluconacetobacter europaeus LMG 18890T and G. europaeus LMG 18494 (reference strains), G. europaeus 5P3, and Gluconacetobacter oboediens 174Bp2 (isolated from vinegar). J Bacteriol 193(10):2670–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58(2):345–352Google Scholar
- Liebner F, Haimer E, Wendland M, Neouze MA, Schlufter K, Miethe P, Heinze T, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2010) Aerogels from unaltered bacterial cellulose: application of scCO(2) drying for the preparation of shaped, ultra-lightweight cellulosic aerogels. Macromol Biosci 10(4):349–352. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200900371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pinto RJB, Neves MC, Neto CP, Trindade T (2012) Composites of cellulose and metal nanoparticles. In: Ebrahimi F (ed) Nanotechnology and nanomaterials, Nanocomposites - new trends and developments, InTech, September 27, 2012 under CC BY 3.0 license. doi: 10.5772/50553
- Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55(1):35–58Google Scholar
- Schutz C, Sort J, Bacsik Z, Oliynyk V, Pellicer E, Fall A, Wagberg L, Berglund L, Bergstrom L, Salazar-Alvarez G (2012) Hard and transparent films formed by nanocellulose-TiO2 nanoparticle hybrids. PLoS One 7(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045828
- Shezad O, Khan S, Khan T, Park JK (2010) Physicochemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohydr Polym 82(1):173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steinbüchel A, Vandamme EJ, De Baets S, Steinbüchel A, Vandamme EJ, Hofrichter M, De Baets S (eds) (2002) Polysaccharides I: polysaccharides from prokaryotes, vol 5. Biopolymers. Wiley, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar