, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 1341–1349 | Cite as

Dilute ammonia pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse followed by enzymatic hydrolysis to sugars

Original Paper


In this work, dilute ammonia pretreatment was performed to break the intricate structure of sugarcane bagasse, which resists the enzyme accessibility to cellulose. The effects of pretreatment temperatures (140–180 °C), times (20–100 min) and ammonia dosage (5–25 wt%) on the recoveries of glucan, xylan, and acid in-soluble lignin were evaluated. The pretreatment performed at 170 °C, 60 min and 15 wt% ammonia resulted in delignification of 36.9 % and retaining 94.7 % of glucan and 63.1 % of xylan in the raw material. Then the enzymatic digestibilities of pretreated samples were investigated, 34.2 g glucose and 13.2 g xylose based on 100 g raw material could be obtained after that pretreatment condition, representing 82.7 % glucose and 47.3 % xylose in sugarcane bagasse. The enhanced digestibilities of dilute ammonia pretreated sugarcane bagasse were due to delignification and the removal of proportion of hemicellulose, which were confirmed by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis.

Graphical Abstract


Sugarcane bagasse Dilute ammonia Pretreatment Delignification Enzymatic hydrolysis 



We acknowledge the financial support from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (no. 2012AA101806), National Key Basic Research Program of China (no. 2013CB228101) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31270625 and 21176095).


  1. Alvira P, Tomas-pejo E, Ballesteros M, Negro MG (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis. A review. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boonsombuti A, Luengnaruemitchai A, Wongkasemjit S (2013) Enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment and its effect in morphology. Cellulose 4:1957–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao S, Aita GM (2013) Enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol yields of combined surfactant and dilute ammonia treated sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 131:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang VS, Holtzapple M (2000) Fundamentals factors affecting biomass reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delmotte L, Ganne-Chedeville C, Leban JM, Pizzi A, Pichelin F (2008) MAS 13C NMR and FT-IR investigation of the degradation reactions of polymer constituents in wood welding. Polym Degrad Stab 93:406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gassan J, Bledzki AK (1999) Possibilities of improving the mechanical properties of jute/epoxy composites by alkali treatment of fibers. Compos Sci Technol 59:1303–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim TH, Lee YY (2007) Pretreatment of corn stover using soaking in aqueous ammonia at moderate temperature. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 136–140:81–92Google Scholar
  8. Kim TH, Taylor F, Hicks KB (2008) Bioethanol production from barley hull using SAA (soaking in aqueous ammonia) pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 99:5694–5702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee JM, Jameel H, Venditti RA (2010) A comparison of the auto hydrolysis and ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) pretreatments on the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of coastal Bermuda grass. Bioresour Technol 101:5449–5458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Limayem A, Ricke SC (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production. Current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Prog Energy Combust 38:449–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ling TP, Hassan O, Badri K, Maskat MY, Mustapha WAW (2013) Sugar recovery of enzymatic hydrolysed oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber by chemical pretreatment. Cellulose 20:3191–3203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Z, Padmanabhan S, Cheng K, Schwyter P, Pauly M, Bell AT, Prausnitz JM (2013) Aqueous-ammonia delignification of miscanthus followed by enzymatic hydrolysis to sugars. Bioresour Technol 135:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin C, Galbe M, Nilvebrant NO, Jonsson LJ (2002) Comparison of the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolyzates of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by steam explosion using different impregnating agents. Appl Biochem Biotech 98–100:699–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT (2000) Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 74:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peng YY, Wu SB (2010) The structural and thermal characteristics of wheat straw hemicellulose. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 88:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Qiu ZH, Aita GM, Walker MS (2012) Effect of ionic liquid pretreatment on the chemical composition, structure and enzymatic hydrolysis of energy cane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 117:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruzene DS, Silva DP, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA, Amorim MT, Goncalves AR (2009) Cellulosic films obtained from the treatment of sugarcane bagasse fibers with N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 154:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salvi DA, Aita GM, Robert D, Bazan V (2010) Dilute ammonia pretreatment of sorghum and its effectiveness on enzyme hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Segal L, Creely L, Martin AE (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D (2006) Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  22. Sonia A, Dasan KP (2013) Chemical, morphology and thermal evaluation of cellulose microfibers obtained from Hibiscus sabdariffa. Carbohydr Polym 92:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang B, Wang XJ, Feng H (2010) Deconstructing recalcitrant miscanthus with alkaline peroxide and electrolyzed water. Bioresour Technol 101:752–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wei L, Shrestha A, Tu M, Adhikari S (2011) Effects of surfactant on biochemical and hydrothermal conversion of softwood hemicellulose to ethanol and furan derivatives. Process Biochem 46:1785–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wei WQ, Wu SB, Liu LG (2012) Enzymatic saccharification of dilute acid pretreated Eucalyptus chips for fermentable sugar production. Bioresour Technol 110:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu J, Zhang JB, He J, Liu Z, Yu Z (2009) Combinations of mild physical or chemical pretreatment with biological pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of rice hull. Bioresour Technol 100:903–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang YHP (2008) Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries. J Ind Microbiol Biotech 35:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang HD, Xu SH, Wu SB (2013) Enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane bagasse by liquid hot water pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 143:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations