, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 1251–1260 | Cite as

Adsorption and viscoelastic properties of cationic xylan on cellulose film using QCM-D

  • Sang Hoon Lee
  • Hak Lae Lee
  • Hye Jung Youn
Original Paper


The adsorption and viscoelastic properties of cationic xylan layers adsorbed from an aqueous electrolyte solution (NaCl 0, 1, 10, 100 mM) on a cellulose model surface were studied using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). Three cationic xylans with different charge densities were used (molecular weight, 9,600 g/mol with degrees of substitution, DS = 0.150, 0.191, and 0.259). The influences of the electrolyte concentration and charge density of cationic xylan on its adsorption onto a cellulose surface were investigated. Low charged cationic xylan was substantially more efficient in surface adsorption on cellulose compared to high charged cationic xylan at a low concentration of electrolytes. Adsorption of low charged cationic xylan decreased with increases in electrolyte concentration. However, adsorption of high cationic xylan increased with electrolyte concentration. The conformation and viscoelastic properties of the layers were interpreted by modeling the data under the assumption that the layers can be explained by the a Voigt model. Low charged cationic xylan adsorbed relatively weakly onto the cellulose surface, and formed a thicker, softer layer than high charged cationic xylan. On the other hand, high charged cationic xylan formed a thinner adsorption layer onto the cellulose surface.


Cationic xylan QCM-D Charge density Electrolyte concentration Adsorption Viscoelastic properties 


  1. Ebringerová A (2006) Structural diversity and application potential of hemicelluloses. Macromol Symp 232:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fleer GJ, Cohen-Stuart MA, Scheutjens JMHM, Cosgrove T, Vincent B (1993) Polymers at interfaces. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 343–375Google Scholar
  3. Gumagul N, Ju S, Page DH (2001) Fiber-fiber bond strength of once-dried pulps. J Pulp Pap Sci 27(3):88–91Google Scholar
  4. Gupta B, Scott W (1995) Interactions between cationic starches and papermaking fibers: the effect of starch characteristics on fibers surface charge and starch retention. In: Proceedings TAPPI 1995 Papermakers Conf, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, pp 85–95Google Scholar
  5. Höök F, Rodahl M, Brzezinski P, Kasemo B (1998) Energy dissipation kinetics for protein and antibody-antigen adsorption under shear oscillation on a quartz crystal microbalance. Langmuir 14:729–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kontturi E, Thune PC, Niemantsverdriet JW (2003) Cellulose model surfaces- simplified preparation by spin coating and characterization by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 19(14):5735–5741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laine J, Lindström T, Glad Nordmark G, Risinger G (2002) Studies on topochemical modification of cellulosic fibers, part 2, the effect of carboxymethylcellulose attachment on fiber swelling and paper strength. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 15(5):316–324Google Scholar
  8. Lee SH, Lee HL, Youn HJ (2008) The quantitative determination of hemicelluloses adsorbed on Hw-BKP using HPLC. J Korea TAPPI 40(4):43–50Google Scholar
  9. Lee SH, Lee HL, Youn HJ, Zhu HX (2010) Adsorption of cationic birchwood xylan on Hw-BKP and its effect on paper properties. J Korea TAPPI 42(2):1–11Google Scholar
  10. Linder Å, Bergman R, Bodin A, Gatenholm P (2006) Mechanism of assembly of xylan onto cellulose surfaces. Langmuir 19:5072–5077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ren JL, Peng F, Sun RC, Kennedy JF (2009) Influence of hemicelluloses derivatives on the sulfate kraft pulp strength. Carbohydr Polym 75:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roberts JC, Au CO, Clay GA, Lough C (1986) The effect of C14-labelled cationic starch on dry strength and formation using C14 labeling. Tappi 69(10):88–93Google Scholar
  13. Roberts JC, Au CO, Clay GA, Lough C (1987) A study of the effect of cationic starch on dry strength and formation using C14 labeling. J Pulp Pap Sci 13(1):J1–J5Google Scholar
  14. Saarinen T, Österberg M, Laine J (2009) Properties of cationic polyelectrolyte layers adsorbed on silica and cellulose surfaces studied by QCM-D—effect of polyelectrolyte charge density and molecular weight. J Dispers Sci Technol 30:969–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schwikal K, Heinze T, Saake B, Puls J, Kaya A, Esker AR (2011) Properties of spruce sulfite pulp and birch kraft pulp after sorption of cationic birch xylan. Cellulose 18:727–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sjöström E (1992) Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  17. Tammelin T, Merta J, Johansson LS, Stenius P (2004) Viscoelastic properties of cationic starch adsorbed on quartz studied by QCM-D. Langmuir 20(25):10900–10909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Timell TE (1967) Recent progress in the chemistry of wood hemicelluloses. Wood Sci Technol 1(1):45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Voinova MV, Rodahl M, Johnson M, Kasemo B (1999) Viscoelastic acoustic response of layered polymer films at fluid-solid interfaces: continuum mechanics approach. Phys Scr 59(5):391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Voinova MV, Johnson M, Kasemo B (2002) ‘Missing mass’ effect in biosensor’s QCM applications. Biosens Bioelectron 17(10):835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wågberg L (2000) Polyelectrolyte adsorption onto cellulose fibers—a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 15(5):586–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhou Q, Rutland MW, Teeri TT, Brumer H (2007) Xyloglucan in cellulose modification. Cellulose 14(6):625–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Sciences, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Personal Safety DivisionHwasung-siKorea

Personalised recommendations