Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 2559–2567 | Cite as

Production of microfibrillated cellulose from unbleached kraft pulp of Kenaf and Scotch Pine and its effect on the properties of hardwood kraft: microfibrillated cellulose paper

  • P. Rezayati CharaniEmail author
  • M. Dehghani-Firouzabadi
  • E. Afra
  • Å. Blademo
  • A. Naderi
  • T. Lindström
Original Paper

Abstract

This work investigated the effect of using Kenaf bast fibre kraft pulps compared to Scotch Pine kraft pulps for producing microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) and its employment for improving mechanical and physical properties of handsheets made from unbleached kraft hardwood pulp. It was shown that MFC based on Kenaf fibres can be produced at higher consistencies [>5 % (w/w)] compared to when Scotch Pine is employed [≈2 % (w/w)] as raw material. The possibility of using a higher consistency when processing Kenaf is beneficial for the processing in microfluidizers. The rheological properties of the products were shown to be consistent with what is known for MFC-based systems. The studies indicate that the mechanical properties of handsheets from unbleached kraft hardwood pulp can be improved by replacing part of the unbleached kraft hardwood pulp fibres with either unbleached kraft Kenaf pulp or unbleached Scotch Pine kraft pulp. However, the same levels of improvements were obtained when using only a small amount [≈6 % (w/w)] of MFC based on Kenaf or Scotch Pine, when introduced into the system either as a dry strength additive or by coating pre-made handsheets. Finally, it was shown that the incorporation of MFC in handsheets decreases the air-permeability; this effect became amplified when the MFC was applied as a coating onto the handsheets.

Keywords

Kenaf bast fibre kraft pulp Scotch Pine kraft pulp Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) Paper strength properties Rheology Coating 

References

  1. Afra E, Yousefi H, Hadilam MM, Nishino T (2013) Comparative effect of mechanical beating and nanofibrillation of cellulose on paper properties made from bagasse and softwood pulps. Carbohydr Polym 97:725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agoda-Tandjawa G, Durand S, Berot S, Blassel C, Gaillard C, Garnier C, Doublier J-L (2010) Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions after freezing. Carbohydr Polym 80:677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J (2008) Cellulose nanofibrils—adsorption with poly (amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 15(2):303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahtoee A, Zargari K, Baniani E (2012) An investigation on fibre production of different Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) genotypes. World Appl Sci J 16(1):63–66Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya D, Germinario LT, Winter WT (2008) Isolation, preparation and characterization of cellulose microfibers obtained from bagasse. Carbohydr Polym 73:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dufresne A, Dupeyre D, Vignon MR (2000) Cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells: processing and characterization of starch-cellulose microfibril composites. J Appl Polym Sci 76(14):2080–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksen Ø, Gregersen WØ, Syverud K (2008) The effect of MFC on handsheet surface and printing properties. In: Proceedings, progress in paper physics seminar, June 2–5, Espoo, Finland, pp 167–170Google Scholar
  9. Faruq G, Alamgir MA, Rahman MM, Subha B, Motior MR (2011) Evaluation of genetic variability of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) from different geographic origins using morpho-agronomic traits and multivariate analysis. AJCS 5(13):1882–1890Google Scholar
  10. Hassan EA, Hassan ML, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated from xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fiber Sci 43(1):76–82Google Scholar
  11. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibres. Eur Polymer J 43:3434–3441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:797–813Google Scholar
  13. Iotti M, Gregersen ØW, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 9(3):1022–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson C, Bras J, Mondragon I, Nechita P, Plackett D, Šimon P, Svetec DG, Virtanen S, Baschetti MG, Breen C, Clegg F, Aucejo S (2012) Renewable fibres and bio-based materials for packaging applications–a review of recent developments. BioResources 7(2):2506–2552Google Scholar
  16. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Shakeri A, Misra M, Oksman K (2009) Chemical composition, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached Kenaf bast (Hibiscus cannabinus) pulp and nanofibres. BioResources 4(2):626–639Google Scholar
  17. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Mathew AP, Hussein MZB, Oksman K (2010a) Preparation of cellulose nanofibres with hydrophobic surface characteristics. Cellulose 17:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Tahir PM, Zaini LH, Azry SS, Makinejad MD (2010b) Characteristics of nanofibres extracted from Kenaf core. BioResources 5(4):2556–2566Google Scholar
  19. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Tahir PM, Shakeri A, Saiful Azry S, Davoodi Makinejad M (2011) Physicochemical characterization of pulp and nanofibres from Kenaf stem. Mater Lett 65:1098–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Abdullah I, Dufresne A, Zainudin SY, Sheltami RM (2012) Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology, crystallinity, and thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from Kenaf bast fibres. Cellulose 19:855–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorri A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindström T, Winter L (1988) Mikrofibrillärcellulosa som komponent vid papperstillverkning. STFI-meddelande C159Google Scholar
  23. Manninen M, Kajanto I, Happonen J, Paltakari J (2011) The effect of microfibrillated cellulose addition on drying shrinkage and dimensional stability of wood-free paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 26(3):297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Missoum K, Martoïa F, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2013) Effect of chemically modified nanofibrillated cellulose addition on the properties of fiber-based materials. Ind Crops Prod 48:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mossello AA, Harun J, Tahir PM, Resalati H, Ibrahim R, Fallah Shamsi SR, Mohmamed AZ (2010) A review of literatures related of using Kenaf for pulp production (beating, fractionation, and recycled fibre). Mod Appl Sci 4(9):21–29Google Scholar
  26. Orhan M (2010) Polylactide foams reinforced with wood fibres or microfibrillated cellulose. Uppsala University, Faculty of Science and Technology. Master Thesis, p 8Google Scholar
  27. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE, Yong T, Ma Z, Ramaseshan R (2006) Electrospun nanofibres: solving global issues. Mater Today 9(3):40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rezayati Charani P (2013) Production and using of Kenaf nanofibers for improvement of kraft paper properties. Gorgan University of agricultural sciences and natural resources. Doctoral Thesis, p 63Google Scholar
  30. Rezayati Charani P, Dehghani-Firouzabadi M, Afra E, Shakeri A (2013) Rheological characterization of high concentrated MFC gel from Kenaf unbleached pulp. Cellulose 20(2):727–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterization of rheological behaviour. Cellulose 19(3):647–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saarinen T, Lille M, Seppälä J (2009) Technical aspects on rheological characterization of microfibrillar cellulose water suspensions. Ann Trans Nord Rheol Soc 17:121–128Google Scholar
  33. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarwar Jahan M, Saeed A, Ni Y (2012) Extraction of cellulose microfibrils from non-wood lignocellulose material using biorefinery concept. Lignocellulose 1(3):185–195Google Scholar
  35. Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromolecules 11(9):2195–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shakhes J, Zeinaly F, Marandi MAB, Saghafi T (2012) Effects of harvest time and cultivar on yield and physical properties fibres of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Afr J Biochem Res 6(6):69–74Google Scholar
  37. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sjöström E (1993) Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications. Gulf Professional Publishing. Hemistry: fundamentals and applications. Gulf Professional Publishing. p 133Google Scholar
  39. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ (2010a) Aspects of raw materials and processing conditions on the production and utilization of microfibrillated cellulose. International Conference on Nanotechnology for the Forest Products Industry, OtaniemiGoogle Scholar
  40. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2010b) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 17:835–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ (2010c) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. Bioresour Technol 101:5961–5968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spence KL, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ, Venditti RA, Habibi Y (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18:1097–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Surip SN, Wan Jaafar WNR, Azmi NN, Anwar UMK (2012) Microscopy observation on nanocellulose from Kenaf fibre. Adv Mat Res 488–489:72–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of Kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17:1005–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanaka H, Ödberg L, Wågberg L, Lindström T (1990) Adsorption of cationic polyacrylamides onto monodisperse polystyrene latices and cellulose fiber: effect of molecular weight and charge density of cationic polyacrylamides. J Colloid Interface Sci 134(1):219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:815–827Google Scholar
  48. Villar JC, Revilla E, Gómez N, Carbajo JM, Simón JL (2009) Improving the use of Kenaf for kraft pulping by using mixtures of bast and core fibres. Ind Crops Prod 29:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wågberg L, Winter L, Ödberg L, Lindström T (1987) On the charge stoichiometry upon adsorption of a cationic polyelectrolyte on cellulosic materials. Colloids Surf 27:163–173Google Scholar
  50. Zhang J, Song H, Lin L, Zhuang J, Pang C, Liu S (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose from bamboo pulp and its properties. Biomass Bioenergy 39:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Rezayati Charani
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Dehghani-Firouzabadi
    • 2
  • E. Afra
    • 2
  • Å. Blademo
    • 3
  • A. Naderi
    • 3
  • T. Lindström
    • 4
  1. 1.Wood and Paper Technology, Faculty of Natural ResourcesBehbahan Khatam Al Anbia University of TechnologyBehbehanIran
  2. 2.Department of Pulp and Paper Technology, Faculty of Wood and Paper EngineeringGorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural ResourcesGorganIran
  3. 3.Innventia ABStockholmSweden
  4. 4.School of Engineering SciencesKTH-Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations