, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 1223–1235 | Cite as

Peptide conjugated cellulose nanocrystals with sensitive human neutrophil elastase sensor activity

  • J. Vincent Edwards
  • Nicolette Prevost
  • Kandan Sethumadhavan
  • Abul Ullah
  • Brian Condon
Original Paper


In chronic wounds, elevated human neutrophil elastase (HNE) is a destructive protease that has been proposed as a biomarker. Numerous wound dressing designs have been introduced in an effort to lower HNE levels. The clinical detection of HNE as a point of care biomarker or an in situ colorimetric adjuvant to chronic wound dressings presents potential advantages in the management of chronic wounds. A colorimetric approach to the detection of HNE using peptide conjugated cotton cellulose nanocrystals (CCN) is reported here. For this purpose a HNE tripeptide substrate, n-Succinyl-Alanine–Alanine-Valine-para-nitroanilide (Suc-Ala–Ala-Val-pNA), was covalently attached to glycine esterified CCN and compared with a similar tetrapeptide analog for colorimetric HNE sensor activity. Visible HNE activity was significantly higher on CCN tripeptide conjugates when compared with similar analogs synthesized on paper. Upon enzymatic release of para-nitroaniline (pNA) from the Glycine-CCN conjugate of succinyl-Ala–Ala-Val-pNA, amplification of the colorimetric response from pNA with reactive dyes enhanced visible absorption of the chromogen. Two color amplifying dyes that react with pNA were compared for their ability to enhance the visual sensor response to HNE activity. The colorimetric detection of HNE with CCN tripeptide conjugates was sensitive at HNE levels previously reported in chronic wound fluid (0.05 U/mL HNE). The HNE sensor and the chromogen amplifying dyes were interfaced with 50 and 10 kD dialysis cellulose membranes (DCM) to model filtration of HNE and chromogen (pNA) from a model wound dressing surface before and after sensor reactivity. The detection sensitivity to HNE activity was assessed with the CCN-tripeptide conjugate interfaced at the DCM surface distal and proximal to a dressing surface. The HNE sensor interfaced proximal to the dressing surface was most efficient with 10 kD membrane filtration of pNA and subsequent reaction with amplifying dyes. When interfaced with the 10 kD cellulose membrane, elastase sensor activity remained sensitive to 0.05 U/mL HNE. The nanocellulose surface properties, performance and design issues of the biosensor approach are discussed.


Human neutrophil elastase Biosensor Cotton cellulose nanocrystals Peptide Dialysis cellulose membrane Chronic wounds 


  1. Adhiraan N, Shanmugasundaram N, Babu M (2007) Gelatin microspheres cross-linked with EDC as a drug delivery system for doxycyline: development and characterization. J Microencapsul 24:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo AC, Song Y, Lundeberg J, Stahl PL, Brumer H (2012) Activated paper surfaces for the rapid hybridization of DNA through capillary transport. Anal Chem 84:3311–3317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballerstadt R, Schultz J (1996) Sensor methods for use with microdialysis and ultrafiltration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 21:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barazzouk S, Daneault C (2012) Tryptophan-based peptides grafted onto oxidized nanocellulose. Cellulose 19:481–493Google Scholar
  5. Barros SC, Martins JA, Marcos JC, Cavaco-Paulo A (2012) Characterization of potential elastase inhibitor-peptides regulated by a molecular switch for wound dressing applications. Enzym Microb Technol 50:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackwell HE (2006) Hitting the SPOT: small-molecule macroarrays. Adv Comb Synth 10:203–212Google Scholar
  7. Cheng CM, Martinez AW, Gong J, Mace CR, Phillips ST, Carrilho E, Mirica KA, Whitesides GM (2010) Paper-based Elisa. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:4771–4774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark RAF (1996) Wound repair: overview and general considerations. In: Richard AFC (ed) The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. Plenum, New York, pp 3–35Google Scholar
  9. Cullen B, Smith R, McCulloch E, Silcock D, Morrison L (2002) Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Reg Rep 10:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dargaville TR, Farrugia BL, Broadbent JA, Pace S, Upton Z (2013) Sensors and imaging for wound healing: a review. Biosens Bioelectron 41:30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das G, Talukdar P, Matile S (2002) Fluorometric detection of enzyme activity with synthetic supramolecular pores. Science 298:1600–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diegelmann RF (2003) Excessive neutrophils characterize chronic pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 11:490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dufresne A (2008) Polysaccharide nanocrystal reinforced nanocomposites. Can J Chem 86:484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards JV, Batiste SL, Gibbins EM, Goheen SC (1999a) Synthesis and activity of NH2- and COOH- terminal elastase recognition sequences on cotton. J Pept Res 54:536–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards JV, Bopp AF, Batiste S, Ullah AJ, Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF, Montante SJ (1999b) Inhibition of elastase by synthetic cotton-bound serine protease inhibitor: in vitro kinetics and inhibitor release. Wound Rep Reg 7:106–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards JV, Yager DR, Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF, Montante S, Bertoniere N, Bopp AF (2001) Modified cotton gauze dressings that selectively absorb neutrophil elastase activity in solution. Wound Rep Reg 9:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards JV, Bopp AF, Batiste SL, Goynes WR (2003) Human neutrophil elastase inhibition with a novel cotton-alginate wound dressing formulation. J Biomed Mat Res (A) 66:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards JV, Caston-Pierre S, Bopp AF, Goynes W (2005) Detection of human neutrophil elastase with peptide-bound cross-linked ethoxylate acrylate resin analogs. J Pept Res 66:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards JV, Howley P, Davis R, Mashchak A, Goheen SC (2007) Protease inhibition by oleic acid transfer from chronic wound dressing to albumin. Int J Pharm 340:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards JV, Caston-Pierre S, Howley P, Condon B, Arnold J (2008) A bio-sensor for human neutrophil elastase employs peptide-para-nitroanilide cellulose conjugates. Sens Lett 6:518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards JV, Prevost NT, Condon B, French A, Wu Q (2012) Immobilization of lysozyme-cellulose amide-linked conjugates on cellulose I and II cotton nanocrystalline preparations. Cellulose 19:495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eming SA, Smola-Hess S, Kurschat P, Hirche D, Krieg T, Smola H (2006) A novel property of povidon-iodine: inhibition of excessive protease levels in chronic non-healing wounds. J Invest Dermatol 126:2731–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eyley S, Thielemans W (2011) Imidazolium grafted cellulose nanocrystals for ion exchange applications. Chem Comm 47:4177–4179Google Scholar
  24. Fleming K, Gray DG, Matthews S (2001) Cellulose crystallites. Chem Eur J 7:1831–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedman RB, Kwaan HC, Szczecinski M (1977) Improved sensitivity of chromogenic substrate assays for urokinase and plasmin. Thromb Res 12:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grinnell F, Zhu M (1994) Identification of neutrophil elastase as the proteinase in burn wound fluid responsible for the degradation of fibronectin. J Invest Dermatol 103:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grinnell F, Zhu M (1996) Fibronectin degradation in chronic wounds depends on the relative levels of elastase, 1-proteinase inhibitor and 2-macroglobulin. J Invest Dermatol 106:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habibi Y, Chanzy H, Vignon MR (2006) Tempo-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 13:679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hasmann A, Gewessler U, Hulla E, Schneider KP, Binder B, Francesko A, Tzanov T, Schintler M, Palen JV, Guebitz GM, Wehrschuetz-Sigl E (2011) Sensor materials for the detection of human neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G activity in wound fluid. Exp Dermatol 20:508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. He J-L, Wu Z-S, Zhang S-B, Shen G-L, Yu R-Q (2010) Fluorescence aptasensor based on competitive-binding for human neutrophil elastase detection. Talanta 80:1264–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henares M, Takashi N, Yoshida S, Terabe F, Mizutani R, Sikizawa R, Hisamoto H (2007) Integration of multianalyte sensing function on a capillary-assembled microchip: simultaneous determination of ion concentration and enzymatic activities by “drop-and-sip” technique. Anal Chem 79:908–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herrick SE, Sloan P, McGurk MM, Freak L, McCollum CN, Ferguson MW (1992) Sequential changes in histologic pattern and extracellular matrix deposition during the healing of chronic venous ulcers. Am J Pathol 141:1085–1095Google Scholar
  34. Herrick S, Ashcroft G, Ireland G, Horan M, McCollum C, Ferguson M (1997) Up-regulation of elastase in acute wounds of healthy aged humans and chronic venous leg ulcers are associate with matrix degradation. Lab Investig 77:281–288Google Scholar
  35. Hofer HP, Kukovetz E, Petek W, Schweighofer F, Wildburger R, Schaur RJ (1996) Released PMN elastase: an indicator of postsurgical uneventful wound healing and early inflammatory complications. A contribution to the search for objective criteria in wound healing monitoring. Injury 26:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. International Consensus (2011) The role of proteases in wound diagnostics. An expert working review. Wounds International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. James TJ, Hughes MA, Cherry GW, Taylor PT (2003) Simple biochemical markers to assess chronic wounds. Wound Rep Reg 11:172–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kwaan HC, Friedmann RB, Szczecinski M (1978) Amplification of color yield of chromogenic substrates using p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde. Thromb Res 13:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lam EL, Male KB, Male Chong JH, Leung ACW, Loung JHT (2012) Applications of functionalized and nanoparticle-modified nanocrystalline cellulose. Trends Biotechnol 30:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leetsma-Vogt G, Rhemrev-Boom MM, Tissen RG, Venema K, Korf J (2004) The potential of biosensor technology in clinical monitoring and experimental research. Biomed Mater Eng 14:455–464Google Scholar
  42. Meyer-Ingold W, Eichner W, Ettner N, Schink M (2000) Wound coverings for removal of interfering factors from wound fluid. United States Patent 6,156,334Google Scholar
  43. Mihranyan A, Nyholm L, Bennett AEG, Stromme M (2008) A novel high specific surface area conducting paper material composed of polypyrrole and Cladophora cellulose. J Phys Chem B 112:12249–12255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pelton R (2009) Bioactive paper provides a low-cost platform for diagnostics. Trends Anal Chem 28:925–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramanathan M, Luckarift HR, Sarsenova A, Wild JR, Ramanculov EK, Olsen EV, Simonian AL (2009) Lysozyme-mediated formation of protein-silica nano-composites for biosensing applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 73:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rayment EA, Dargaville TR, Shooter GK, George GA, Upton Z (2008) Attenuation of protease activity in chronic wound fluid with bisphosphonate-functionalized hydrogels. Biomaterials 29:1785–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Samir MASA, Alloin F, Sanchez JY, Kissi NE, Dufresne A (2004) Preparation of cellulose whisker reinforced nanocomposites from an organic medium suspension. Macromolecules 37:1386–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Samir MASA, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulose whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6:612–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schultz GS, Ladwig G, Wysocki A (2005) Extracellular matrix: review of its roles in acute and chronic wounds. http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2005/August/Schultz/ Extrace-Matric-Acute-Chronic-Wounds.html, World Wide Wounds, p 13
  50. Shen B, Shimmon S, Smith MM, Ghosh PJ (2003) Biosensor analysis of the molecular interactions of pentosan polysulfate and of sulfated glycosaminoglycans with immobilized elastase, hyaluronidase and lysozyme using surface plasmon resonance technology. Pharm Biomed Anal 31:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) New process of chemical grafting of cellulose nanoparticles with a long chain isocyanate. Langmuir 26:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sjo P (2012) Neutrophil elastase inhibitors: recent advances in the development of mechanism-based and nonelectrophilic inhibitors. Future Med Chem 4:651–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sorde N, Das G, Matile S (2003) Enzyme screening with synthetic multifunctional pores: focus on biopolymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:11964–11969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stair JL, Watkinson M, Krause S (2009) Sensor materials for the detection of proteases. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2113–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steuerwald AJ, Villeneuve JD, Sun L, Stenken JA (2006) In vitro characterization of an in situ microdialysis sampling assay for elastase activity detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal 40:1041–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Subiros-Funosas R, Prohens R Barbas R, El-Faham A, Albericio F (2009) Oxyma: an efficient additive for peptide synthesis to replace the benzotriazole-based HOBt and HOAt with a lower risk of explosion. Chem Eur J 15:9394–9403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Touzinsky GF, Gordon SH (1979) Degree of substitution of cellulose derivatives containing n different substituent groups. Carbohydr Res 69:327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trejo-‘O’reilly JA, Cavaille JY, Gandini A (1997) The surface chemical modification of cellulosic fibres in view of their use in composite materials. Cellulose 4:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Trengrove NJ, Stacey MC, Macauley S, Bennett N, Gibson F, Burslem F, Murphy G, Schultz G (1999) Biochemical analysis of wound fluid from nonhealing and healing chronic leg ulcers. Wound Rep Reg 7:442–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vachon DJ, Yager DR (2006) Novel sulfonated hydrogel composite with the ability to inhibit proteases and bacterial growth. J Biomed Mater Res 76A:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiegand C, Schonfelder U, Abel M, Ruth P, Kaatz M, Hipler U-C (2010) Protease and proinflammatory cytokine concentrations are elevated in chronic compared to acute wound and can be modulated by collagen type I in vitro. Arch Dermatol Res 302:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright JB, Lam K, Buret AG, Olson ME, Burrell RE (2002) Early healing events in a porcine model of contaminated wounds: effects of nanocrystalline silver on matrix metalloproteinases, cell apoptosis, and healing. Wound Reg Rep 10:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yager DR, Nwomeh BC (2003) The proteolytic environment of chronic wounds. Wound Rep Reg 11:490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yager DR, Chen SM, Ward SI, Olutoye OO, Diegelmann RF, Cohen IK (1997) Ability of chronic wound fluids to degrade peptide growth factors is associated with increased levels of elastase activity and diminished levels of proteinase inhibitors. Wound Rep Reg 5:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yue Y, Zhou C, French AD, Xia G, Han G, Wang Q, Wu Q (2012) Comparative properties of cellulose nano-crystals from native and mercerized cotton fibers. Cellulose 19:1173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Vincent Edwards
    • 1
  • Nicolette Prevost
    • 1
  • Kandan Sethumadhavan
    • 1
  • Abul Ullah
    • 1
  • Brian Condon
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Regional Research CenterUSDA-ARSNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations