Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 3101–3110 | Cite as

High efficiency ultra-deep dyeing of cotton via mercerization and cationization

  • Sha Fu
  • David Hinks
  • Peter Hauser
  • Mary Ankeny
Original Paper

Abstract

A potentially environmentally responsible dyeing procedure for ultra-deep shades on cotton was developed using a cationization method in combination with mercerization. The effects of both treatments on dyeing performance and colorfastness properties of cotton fabrics dyed with reactive dyes were analyzed individually and in combination. Both mercerization and cationization have been proved to be effective in increasing the depth of shade on cotton. The colorfastness properties, except colorfastness to wet crocking, of mercerized–cationized cotton fabrics dyed without salt were much better than untreated cotton dyed using a conventional dyeing procedure. Unlike untreated cotton fabrics, the concentration of Na2CO3 in the dyeing process of mercerized–cationized cotton fabrics was lowered from 20 to 5 g/L without compromising dye fixation and colorfastness properties. With low concentrations of dyes and Na2CO3 and no electrolyte in the dye bath effluent, the dyeing procedure of mercerized–cationized cotton fabrics for ultra-deep shades is potentially a more environmentally benign method than conventional dyeing with reactive dyes.

Keywords

Cotton Dyeing Reactive dye Ultra-deep shades Cationization Mercerization 

References

  1. AATCC (2012) Technical manual of the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM (2010) Standard test method for tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadbent AD (2001) Basic principles of textile coloration. Society of Dyers and Colourists, BradfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai Y, Pailthorpe MT, David SK (1999) A new method for improving the dyeability of cotton with reactive dyes. Text Res J 69:400–446. doi: 10.1177/004051759906900608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrell MJ (2011) Sustainable cotton dyeing. Dissertation, North Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Hashem M, Hauser PJ, Smith B (2003) Reaction efficiency for cellulose cationization using 3-chloro-2- hydroxypropyl trimethyl ammonium chloride. Text Res J 73:1017–1023. doi: 10.1177/004051750307301113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hashem M, Refaie R, Hebeish A (2005) Crosslinking of partially carboxymethylated cotton fabric via cationization. J Clean Prod 13:947–954. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hauser PJ, Tabba AH (2001) Improving the environmental and economic aspects of cotton dyeing using a cationised cotton. Color Technol 117:282–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2001.tb00076.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kanik M, Hauser PJ (2002) Printing of cationised cotton with reactive dyes. Color Technol 118:300–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2002.tb00114.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karmakar SR (1999) Chemical technology in the pre-treatment processes of textiles. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Khalil-Abad MS, Yazdanshenas ME, Nateghi MR (2009) Effect of cationization on adsorption of silver nanoparticles on cotton surfaces and its antibacterial activity. Cellulose 16:1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9351-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis DM, Lei X (1989) Improved cellulose dyeability by chemical modification of the fiber. JSCD 21:23–39Google Scholar
  13. Lewis DM, Mcllroy KA (1997) Modification of cotton with nicotinoyl thioglycollate to improve its dyeability. Dyes Pigments 35:69–86. doi: 10.1016/S0143-7208(96)00087-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ma W, Zhang S, Tang B, Yang J (2005) Pretreatment of cotton with poly(vinylamine chloride) for salt-free dyeing with reactive dyes. Color Technol 121:193–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2005.tb00272.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Montazer M, Malek RMA, Rahimi A (2007) Salt free reactive dyeing of cationized cotton. Fiber Polym 8:608–612. doi: 10.1007/BF02875997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mouxiou E, Eleftheriadis I, Nikolaidis N, Tsatsaroni E (2008) Reactive dyeing of cellulosic fibers: use of cationic surfactants and their interaction with reactive dyes. J Appl Polym Sci 108:1209–1215. doi: 10.1002/app.27705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Patiño A, Canal C, Rodríguez C, Caballero G, Navarro A, Canal JM (2011) Surface and bulk cotton fibre modifications: plasma and cationization. Influence on dyeing with reactive dye. Cellulose 18:1073–1083. doi: 10.1007/s10570-011-9554-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rupin M (1976) Dyeing with direct and fibre reactive dyes. Text Chem Colorist 8:54–58Google Scholar
  19. Rupin M, Veaute G, Balland J (1970) Utilisation de composes reactifs epoxy ammonium quatinairs dans la cellulose encolorante direct et reactifs. Textilveredlung 5:829–838Google Scholar
  20. Tabba AH (2000) Cationization of cotton with 2, 3-epoxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride. North Carolina State University, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  21. Teng X, Zhang S, Ma W (2011) Application of a hydrolyzable cationic agent, poly(acryloxyethyl trimethylammonium chloride), in salt-free reactive dyeing for good dyeing properties. J Appl Polym Sci 122:2741–2748. doi: 10.1002/app.34023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1991) Carbon and nitrogen analysis of soils by automated combustion techniques. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22(9–10):843–850. doi: 10.1080/00103629109368458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sha Fu
    • 1
  • David Hinks
    • 1
  • Peter Hauser
    • 1
  • Mary Ankeny
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Cotton IncorporatedCaryUSA

Personalised recommendations