, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 607–617 | Cite as

Improving the reproducibility of chemical reactions on the surface of cellulose nanocrystals: ROP of ε-caprolactone as a case study

  • Marianne Labet
  • Wim Thielemans


In our group, we work on the surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals. During this work, we have encountered reproducibility issues when the same reactions were performed on nanocrystals from different hydrolysis batches, indicating a variable surface composition. Given the inherent purity of the nanoparticles themselves, this issue was believed to be due to the presence of adsorbed species at the surface of the nanocrystals blocking reactive sites. To investigate this in detail, nanocrystals from several batches were extracted with different solvents. The effect of these extractions on the surface composition of the nanowhiskers was investigated, followed by its effect on the Surface-Initiated Ring-Opening Polymerization (SI-ROP) of ε-caprolactone. The extracted impurities were analysed by NMR (1H and 13C) and MS, showing a variety of adsorbed species which can be removed by solvent extraction. A Soxhlet extraction using ethanol before the reaction was shown to be the most effective in removing adsorbed low molecular weight organic compounds produced during the hydrolysis, resulting in improved reproducibility between reactions using nanocrystals from different batches, as confirmed by FTIR, elemental analysis and XPS. Extraction with ethanol should thus be performed before all reaction as these adsorbed species can be expected to interfere with all surface modification reactions.


Cotton nanocrystals Nanowhiskers Ring-Opening Polymerization (ROP) Surface-Initiated Polymerization (SIP) Polycaprolactone (PCL) Grafting from Purification Ethanol Soxhlet extraction 



Financial support for this work was provided by the EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council) as part of the DICE (Driving Innovation Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) science and innovation award (Grant EP/D501229/1). The authors thank Nacho Villar and Emily Smith for the XPS analyses and Tong Liu (School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham) for the Elemental Analysis measurements.

Supplementary material

10570_2011_9527_MOESM1_ESM.doc (228 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 228 kb)


  1. Angellier H, Miolina-Boisseau S, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A (2005) Surface chemical modification of waxy maize starch nanocrystals. Langmuir 21:2425–2433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casas J, Persson PV, Iversen T, Córdova A (2004) Direct organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization of lactones. Adv Synth Catal 346:1087–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dufresne A (2008) Polysaccharide nanocrystal reinforced nanocomposites. Can J Chem 86:484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Filpponen I, Argyropoulos DS (2010) Regular linking of cellulosse nanocrystals via click chemistry: synthesis and formation of cellulose nanocplatelet gels. Biomacromolecules 11:1060–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gopalan Nair K, Dufresne A, Gandini A, Belgacem MN (2003) Crab shell chitin whisker reinforced natural rubber nanocomposites. 3. Effect of chemical modification of chitin whiskers. Biomacromolecules 4:1835–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goussé C, Chanzy H, Excoffier G, Soubeyrand L, Fleury É (2002) Stable suspensions of partially silylated cellulose whiskers dispersed in organic solvents. Polymer 43:2645–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habibi Y, Dufresne A (2008) Highly filled bionanocomposites from functionalized polysaccharide nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 9:1974–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habibi Y, Chanzy H, Vignon MR (2006) TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 13:679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Habibi Y, Goffin A-L, Schiltz N, Duquesne E, Dubois P, Dufresne A (2008) Bionanocomposites based on poly(ε-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization. J Mater Chem 18:5002–5010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Che Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hafrén J, Córdova A (2005) Direct organocatalytic polymerization from cellulose fibers. Macromol Rapid Commun 26:82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasani M, Cranston ED, Westman G, Gray DG (2008) Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 4:2238–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. BioResources 3:929–980Google Scholar
  15. Labet M, Thielemans W (2009) Synthesis of polycaprolactone: a review. Chem Soc Rev 38:3484–3504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Labet M, Thielemans W, Dufresne A (2007) Polymer grafting onto starch nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 8:2916–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Le Corre D, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Starch nanoparticles: a review. Biomacromolecules 11:1139–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morandi G, Heath L, Thielemans W (2009) Cellulose nanocrystals grafted with polystyrene chains through surface-initiated atom transfer radical poly;erization (SI-ATRP). Langmuir 25:8280–8286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Namazi H, Dadkhah A (2010) Convenient method for preparation of hydrophobically modified starch nanocrystals with using fatty acids. Carbohydr Polym 79:731–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielsen LJ, Eyley S, Thielemans W, Aylott JW (2010) Dual fluorescent labelling of cellulose nanocrystals for pH sensing. J Chem Commun 46:8929–8931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Persson PV, Schröder J, Wickholm K, Hedenström E, Iverson T (2004) Selective organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization: a versatile route to carbohydrate-functionalyzed poly(ε-caprolactones). Macromolecules 37:5889–5893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Revol J-F, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG (1992) Helicoidal self ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int J Biol Macromol 14:170–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rindlav-Westling A, Gatenholm P (2003) Surface composition and morphology of starch, amylose, and amylopectin films. Biomacromolecules 1:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thielemans W, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A (2006) Starch nanorystals with large chain surface modifications. Langmuir 22:4804–4810CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity ParkNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Process and Environmental Research Division, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity ParkNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations