Abstract
This paper discusses a numerical searching approach for the relative motion of formation flying in displaced orbits by spacecraft with low-thrust propulsion. The nonlinear dynamical model of spacecraft is established in a two-body rotating reference frame with arbitrary polar component of momentum and thrust-induced acceleration. Motions near the stable equilibria are distinguished from each other by means of five-dimensional variables, which can then be compressed uniquely into two-dimensional mapping images characterized by the crossing interval and the angle drifts. The surjective but not injective mapping makes the generation of three configurations of the relative motions possible. The corresponding relative orbits for three kinds of two-spacecraft formation flying are searched and exemplified based on the formation conditions formulized as functions of the crossing interval and the angle drifts. Furthermore, based on the assignment of displaced relative orbits to five-dimensional vector, the working orbit of the deputy for a specific chief can also be searched via the optimization algorithm to generate the bounded relative motion with the minimum thrust acceleration magnitude, which is of certain significance in reducing fuel consumption of formations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baig, S., McInnes, C.R.: Light-levitated geostationary cylindrical orbits are feasible. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 33(3), 782–793 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46681
Barrio, R.: Sensitivity tools vs. Poincaré sections. Chaos Solitons Fractals 25(3), 711–726 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.11.092
Breger, L., How, J.P.: Gauss’s variational equation-based dynamics and control for formation flying spacecraft. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(2), 437–448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22649
Breger, L., Inalhan, G., Tillerson, M., How, J.P.: 8-Cooperative spacecraft formation flying: model predictive control with open-and closed-loop robustness. Mod. Astrodyn. 1(07), 237–277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-9305(07)80010-0
Broucke, R.A.: Numerical integration of periodic orbits in the main problem of artificial satellite theory. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 58(2), 99–123 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00695787
Brown, K.M., Hambidge, C.H., Brownett, J.M.: Progress in operational flood mapping using satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 40(2), 196–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316633570
Ciocci, M.C., Langerock, B.: Dynamics of the tippe top via Routhian reduction. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 12(6), 602–614 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354707060032
Gong, S.P., Baoyin, H.X., Li, J.F.: Solar sail formation flying around displaced solar orbits. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(30), 1148–1152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.24315
Kahle, R., Schlepp, B., Meissner, F., et al.: The TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X formation acquisition–from planning to realization. J. Astronaut. Sci. 59(3), 564–584 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-014-0003-3
Lee, D., Sanyal, A.K., Butcher, E.A., et al.: Finite-time control for spacecraft body-fixed hovering over an asteroid. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 51(1), 506–520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.140197
Li, G., Burkholder, R.J.: Hybrid matching pursuit for distributed through-wall radar imaging. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63(4), 1701–1711 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2015.2398115
Martinuşi, V., Gurfil, P.: Solutions and periodicity of satellite relative motion under even zonal harmonics perturbations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 111(4), 387–414 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-011-9376-9
McInnes, C.R., Simmons, J.F.L.: Solar sail halo orbits. Part I: heliocentric case. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 29(4), 466–471 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25487
McInnes, C.R.: Passive control of displaced solar sail orbits. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 21(21), 975–982 (1998a). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4334
McInnes, C.R.: Dynamics, stability, and control of displaced non-Keplerian orbits. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 21(5), 799–805 (1998b). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4309
McInnes, C.R.: Displaced non-Keplerian orbits using impulsive thrust. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 110(3), 199–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-011-9351-5
McKay, R.J., Macdonald, M., Biggs, J., et al.: Survey of highly-non-Keplerian orbits with low-thrust propulsion. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 34(3), 645–666 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52133
Mengali, G., Quarta, A.A.: Non-Keplerian orbits for electric sails. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 105(1), 179–195 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-009-9200-y
Pan, X., Xu, M.: Cislunar navigation constellation by displaced solar sails. J. Navig. 70, 963–982 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S037346331700025X
Qin, A.K., Huang, V.L., et al.: Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(2), 398–417 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2008.927706
Sabol, C., Burns, R., Mclaughlin, C.A.: Satellite formation flying design and evolution. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 38(2), 270–278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3681
Sanchez-Torres, A.: Drag and propulsive forces in electric sails with negative polarity. Adv. Space Res. 57(4), 1065–1071 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.12.013
Schaub, H., Alfriend, K.T.: J2 invariant relative orbits for spacecraft formations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 79(2), 77–95 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011161811472
Simo, J., McInnes, C.R.: Solar sail orbits at the earth-moon libration points. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14(12), 4191–4196 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.03.032
Wang, S.K., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Dynamical systems, the three-body problem and space mission design. Springer, New York (2007)
Wang, W., Mengali, G., Quarta, A.A., Yuan, J.P.: Analysis of relative motion in non-Keplerian orbits via modified equinoctial elements. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 58, 389–400 (2016a). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812792617_0222
Wang, W., Mengali, G., Quarta, A.A., Yuan, J.P.: Extreme values of relative distances for spacecraft in elliptic displaced orbits. Adv. Space Res. 58(4), 475–487 (2016b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.007
Waters, T.J., McInnes, C.R.: Periodic orbits above the ecliptic in the solar-sail restricted three-body problem. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(3), 687–693 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.26232
Xu, M., Xu, S.J.: J 2 invariant relative orbits via differential correction algorithm. Acta Mech. Sin. 23(5), 585–595 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-007-0097-y
Xu, M., Xu, S.J.: Nonlinear dynamical analysis for displaced orbits above a planet. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 102(4), 327–353 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-008-9171-4
Xu, M., Wang, Y., Xu, S.J.: On the existence of J 2, invariant relative orbits from the dynamical system point of view. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 112(4), 427–444 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9401-7
Acknowledgements
Xiao Pan and Ming Xu acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11172020 and 11432001) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, X., Xu, M., Huang, H. et al. Bounded relative motions for formation flying in displaced orbits by low-thrust propulsion. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 130, 47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9845-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9845-5