# A two-level perturbation method for connecting unstable periodic orbits with low fuel cost and short time of flight: application to a lunar observation mission

## Abstract

The proposed method connects two unstable periodic orbits by employing trajectories of their associated invariant manifolds that are perturbed in two levels. A first level of velocity perturbations is applied on the trajectories of the discretized manifolds at the points where they approach the nominal unstable periodic orbit in order to accelerate them. A second level of structured velocity perturbations is applied to trajectories that have already been subjected to first level perturbations in order to approximately meet the necessary conditions for a low \(\varDelta \text {V}\) transfer. Due to this two-level perturbation approach, the number of the trajectories obtained is significantly larger compared with approaches that employ traditional invariant manifolds. For this reason, the problem of connecting two unstable periodic orbits through perturbed trajectories of their manifolds is transformed into an equivalent discrete optimization problem that is solved with a very low computational complexity algorithm that is proposed in this paper. Finally, the method is applied to a lunar observation mission of practical interest and is found to perform considerably better in terms of \(\varDelta \text {V}\) cost and time of flight when compared with previous techniques applied to the same project.

## Keywords

Space mission design Unstable periodic orbits Perturbed trajectories of invariant manifolds Halo orbits Lunar mission## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments.

## References

- Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd edn. MIT Press, NY (2009)MATHGoogle Scholar
- Davis, K.E.: Locally optimal transfer trajectories between libration point orbits using invariant manifolds. PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (2009)Google Scholar
- Davis, K.E., Anderson, R.L., Scheeres, D.J., Born, G.H.: The use of invariant manifolds for transfers between unstable periodic orbits of different energies. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**107**, 471–485 (2010)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Davis, K.E., Anderson, R.L., Scheeres, D.J., Born, G.H.: Optimal transfers between unstable periodic orbits using invariant manifolds. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**109**, 241–264 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Davis, K., Born, G., Deilami, M., Larsen, A., Butcher, E.: Transfers to Earth–Moon L3 halo orbits. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August (2012)Google Scholar
- Davis, K., Born, G., Butcher, E.: Transfers to Earth–Moon \(\text{ L }_3\) halo orbits. Acta Astronaut.
**88**, 116–118 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Davis, K., Parker, J., Butcher, E.: Transfers from Earth to EarthMoon \(\text{ L }_3\) halo orbits using accelerated manifolds. Adv. Space Res.
**55**, 868–1877 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gómez, G., Jorba, A., Masdemont, J., Simó, C.: Study of the transfer from the Earth to a halo orbit around the equilibrium point \(\text{ L }_1\). Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**56**, 541–562 (1993)ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Gómez, G., Jorba, A., Masdemont, J., Simó, C.: Study of the transfer between halo orbits. Acta Astronaut.
**43**, 493–520 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gómez, G., Masdemont, J.: Some zero cost transfers between libration point orbits. AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, January (2000)Google Scholar
- Gómez, G., Koon, W.S., Marsden, J.E., Masdemont, J., Ross, S.D.: Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial restricted three-body problem. Nonlinearity
**17**, 1571–1606 (2004)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Grebow, D.: Generating periodic orbits in the circular restricted three-body problem with applications to lunar south pole coverage. M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (2006)Google Scholar
- Grebow, D.: Trajectory design in the Earth–Moon system and lunar south pole coverage. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (2010)Google Scholar
- Hamera, K., Mosher, T., Gefreh, M., Paul, R., Slavkin, L., Trojan, J.: An evolvable lunar communication and navigation constellation concept. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, May (2008)Google Scholar
- Hiday-Johnston, L.A., Howell, K.C.: Transfers between libration point orbits in the elliptic restricted problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**58**, 317–337 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hill, K., Parker, J.S., Born, G.H., Demandante, N.: A lunar \(\text{ L }_2\) navigation, communication, and gravity mission. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Keystone, Colorado, August (2006)Google Scholar
- Howell, K.C.: Three dimensional, periodic, ’halo’, orbits. Celest. Mech.
**32**, 53–71 (1984)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Koon, W.S., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics. Chaos
**10**, 427–469 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Koon, W.S., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem and Space Mission Design. Springer-Verlag, New York (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
- Mingotti, G., Topputo, F., Bernelli-Zazzera, F.: Low-energy, low-thrust transfers to the Moon. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**105**, 61–74 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Mitzenmacher, M., Upfal, E.: Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Parker, J.S., Born, G.H.: Modeling a low-energy ballistic lunar transfer using dynamical systems theory. J. Spacecr. Rockets
**45**, 1269–1281 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shampine, L.F., Gordon, M.K.: Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: The Initial Value Problem. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco (1975)MATHGoogle Scholar
- Strange, N., Landau, D., McElrath, T., Lantoine, G., Lam, T., McGuire, M., Burke, L., Martini, M. and Dankanich, J.: Overview of mission design for NASA asteroid redirect robotic mission concept. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, Washington, DC, October (2013)Google Scholar
- Surovik, D.A., Scheeres, D.J.: Adaptive reachability analysis to achieve mission objectives in strongly non-Keplerian systems. J. Guid. Control Dyn.
**38**, 468–477 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Surovik, D.A., Scheeres, D.J.: Abstraction predictive control for chaotic spacecraft orbit design. In: 5th IFAC Conference on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, Seville, Spain, September (2015)Google Scholar
- Sweetser, T.H.: Estimate of the global minimum \(DV\) needed for Earth–Moon transfer. In: AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Houston, Texas, February (1991)Google Scholar
- Szebehely, V.: Theory of Orbits. Academic Press, New York (1967)Google Scholar
- Trumbauer, E., Villac, B.: Heuristic search-based framework for onboard trajectory redesign. J. Guid. Control Dyn.
**37**, 164–175 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tsirogiannis, G.A.: A graph based methodology for mission design. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**114**, 353–363 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tsirogiannis, G.A., Markellos, V.V.: A greedy global search algorithm for connecting unstable periodic orbits with low energy cost. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron.
**117**, 201–213 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Welch, C.M., Parker, J.S., Buxton, C.: Mission considerations for transfers to a distant retrograde orbit. J. Astronaut. Sci.
**62**, 101–124 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wilson, R.: Derivation of differential correctors used in GENESIS mission design. Technical Report JPL IOM 312.I–03–002, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California (2003)Google Scholar