Advertisement

Planetary long periodic terms in Mercury’s rotation: a two dimensional adiabatic approach

  • Sandrine D’Hoedt
  • Anne Lemaître
Original Article

Abstract

The averaged spin-orbit resonant motion of Mercury is considered, with e the orbital eccentricity, and i o the orbital inclination introduced as very slow functions of time, given by any secular planetary theory. The basis is our Hamiltonian approach (D’Hoedt, S., Lemaître, A.: Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 89:267–283, 2004) in which Mercury is considered as a rigid body. The model is based on two degrees of freedom; the first one is linked to the 3:2 resonant spin-orbit motion, and the second one to the commensurability of the rotational and orbital nodes. Mercury is assumed to be very close to the Cassini equilibrium of the model. To follow the motion of rotation close to this equilibrium, which varies with respect to time through e and i o , we use the adiabatic invariant theory, extended to two degrees of freedom. We calculate the corrections (remaining functions) introduced by the time dependence of e and i o in the three steps necessary to characterize the frequencies at the equilibrium. The conclusion is that Mercury follows the Cassini equilibrium (stays in the Cassini forced state), in an adiabatic behavior: the area around the equilibrium does not change by more than \({\varepsilon}\) for times smaller than \({\frac{1}{\varepsilon}}\) . The role of the inclination and the eccentricity can be dissociated and measured in each step of the canonical transformation.

Keywords

Mercury Rotation Adiabatic invariant Planetary perturbations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D’Hoedt, S., Lemaître, A.: The spin-orbit resonant rotation of Mercury: a two degree of freedom Hamiltonian model. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 89, 267–283 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Hoedt, S., Lemaître, A.: The spin-orbit resonance of Mercury: a Hamiltonian approach. In: Kurtz, D.W., Bromage, G.E. (eds.) Transits of Venus: New Views of the Solar System and Galaxy. Proceedings of IAU Colloquium 196, pp. 263–270 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. D’Hoedt, S., Lemaître, A.: The spin-orbit resonant rotation of Mercury. Lect. Notes Phys. 682, 169 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Hoedt, S., Lemaître, A.: Note on Mercury’s rotation: the four equilibria of the Hamiltonian model. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 96, 253–258 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dufey, J., Lemaître, A., Rambaux, N.: Planetary perturbations on Mercury’s libration in longitude. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. (Submitted)Google Scholar
  6. Henrard, J.: Capture into resonance: an extension of the use of adiabatic invariants. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 27, 3–22 (1982)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Henrard, J., Lemaître, A.: The untangling transformation. Astronom. J. 130, 2415–2417 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Henrard, J., Schwanen, G.: The role of the inclination in the captures in external resonances. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 89, 181–200 (2004)CrossRefADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemaître, A., D’Hoedt, S., Rambaux, N.: The 3:2 spin-orbit resonant motion of Mercury. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 95, 213–224 (2006)CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Peale, S.J.: Possible histories of the obliquity of Mercury. Astronom. J. 79, 72 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Peale, S.J.: The proximity of Mercury’s spin to Cassini state 1 from adiabatic invariance. Icarus 181, 338–347 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Rambaux, N., Lemaître, A., D’Hoedt, S.: Coupled rotational phase space for Mercury. Astron. Astrophys. 470, 741–747 (2007)CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Yseboodt, M., Margot, J.L.: Evolution of Mercury’s obliquity. Icarus 181, 327–337 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dynamical Systems, Department of MathematicsUniversity of NamurNamurBelgium

Personalised recommendations