Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 1—A Theoretical Framework and Application to Dyadic Peer Relationships
Investigators have long recognized that adolescents’ peer experiences provide a crucial context for the acquisition of developmental competencies, as well as potential risks for a range of adjustment difficulties. However, recent years have seen an exponential increase in adolescents’ adoption of social media tools, fundamentally reshaping the landscape of adolescent peer interactions. Although research has begun to examine social media use among adolescents, researchers have lacked a unifying framework for understanding the impact of social media on adolescents’ peer experiences. This paper represents Part 1 of a two-part theoretical review, in which we offer a transformation framework to integrate interdisciplinary social media scholarship and guide future work on social media use and peer relations from a theory-driven perspective. We draw on prior conceptualizations of social media as a distinct interpersonal context and apply this understanding to adolescents’ peer experiences, outlining features of social media with particular relevance to adolescent peer relations. We argue that social media transforms adolescent peer relationships in five key ways: by changing the frequency or immediacy of experiences, amplifying experiences and demands, altering the qualitative nature of interactions, facilitating new opportunities for compensatory behaviors, and creating entirely novel behaviors. We offer an illustration of the transformation framework applied to adolescents’ dyadic friendship processes (i.e., experiences typically occurring between two individuals), reviewing existing evidence and offering theoretical implications. Overall, the transformation framework represents a departure from the prevailing approaches of prior peer relations work and a new model for understanding peer relations in the social media context.
KeywordsAdolescents Social media Peer relations Friendship Relationship quality Review
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1144081) awarded to Jacqueline Nesi. This work was also supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-MH85505, R01-HD055342) Grants awarded to Mitchell J. Prinstein.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Almquist, Y. B., & Östberg, V. (2013). Social relationships and subsequent health-related behaviours: Linkages between adolescent peer status and levels of adult smoking in a Stockholm cohort: Peer status in school and adult smoking. Addiction, 108(3), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04097.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anandarajan, M., Zaman, M., Dai, Q., & Arinze, B. (2010). Generation Y adoption of instant messaging: An examination of the impact of social usefulness and media richness on use richness. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2046082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1518924.
- boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Retrieved from http://www.danah.org/papers/2020/SNSasNetworkedPublics.
- Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Peer relationships and the development of psychopathology. In M. Lewis & K. D. Rudolph (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 185–204). Boston, MA: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-9608-3_10.
- Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Davila, J., Hershenberg, R., Feinstein, B. A., Gorman, K., Bhatia, V., & Starr, L. R. (2012). Frequency and quality of social networking among young adults: Associations with depressive symptoms, rumination, and corumination. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027512.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Vries, D. A., Peter, J., de Graaf, H., & Nikken, P. (2016). Adolescents’ social network site use, peer appearance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: Testing a mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0266-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.danah.org/papers/2013/SocialityThruSNS-preprint.pdf.
- Greenfield, P. M., & Cocking, R. R. (2014). Cross-cultural roots of minority child development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jordan, A. B., & Romer, D. (2014). Media and the well-being of children and adolescents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H. G. M., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2013). Practice makes perfect: The longitudinal effect of adolescents’ instant messaging on their ability to initiate offline friendships. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2265–2272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The Communication of Ideas, 37, 215–228.Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A. (2015a). Teens, social media and technology overview 2015. Retrieved June 28, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/.
- Lenhart, A. (2015b, August 6). Teens, technology and friendships. Retrieved May 3, 2017, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/06/teens-technology-and-friendships/.
- Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. K. (2014). Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(6), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Love, B., Crook, B., Thompson, C. M., Zaitchik, S., Knapp, J., LeFebvre, L., et al. (2012). Exploring psychosocial support online: A content analysis of messages in an adolescent and young adult cancer community. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 555–559. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective: A longitudinal study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. (1998). Person-context interaction theories. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 685–759). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Canada: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Menting, B., Van Lier, P. A. C., Koot, H. M., Pardini, D., & Loeber, R. (2016). Cognitive impulsivity and the development of delinquency from late childhood to early adulthood: Moderating effects of parenting behavior and peer relationships. Development and Psychopathology, 28(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941500036X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mikami, A. Y., Szwedo, D. E., Ahmad, S. I., Samuels, A. S., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2015). Online social communication patterns among young adult women with histories of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 124(3), 576–588. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000053.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Moreno, M., & Kota, R. (2013). Social media. In V. C. Strasburger, B. Wilson, & A. B. Jordan (Eds.), Children, adolescents, and the media (3rd ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://nls.ldls.org.uk/welcome.html?ark:/81055/vdc_100025421490.0x000001.
- Nesi, J., & Prinstein, M. J. (in press). In search of likes: Longitudinal associations between adolescents’ digital status seeking and health-risk behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2018.1437733.
- Nesi, J., Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2016). Technology-based communication and the development of interpersonal competencies within adolescent romantic relationships: A preliminary investigation, 27(2), 471–477. Journal of Research on Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12274.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1996). The developmental significance of children’s friendship relations. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 289–321). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), JCMC145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00172.x.Google Scholar
- Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2013). The effects of Internet communication on adolescents’ psychological development. The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems136/full.
- Prinstein, M. J., Borelli, J. L., Cheah, C. S. L., Simon, V. A., & Aikins, J. W. (2005). Adolescent girls’ interpersonal vulnerability to depressive symptoms: A longitudinal examination of reassurance-seeking and peer relationships. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(4), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rideout, V. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by Tweens and Teen. Common Sense Media. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens.
- Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stewart, M., Barnfather, A., Magill-Evans, J., Ray, L., & Letourneau, N. (2011). Brief report: An online support intervention: Perceptions of adolescents with physical disabilities. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tillema, T., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2010). Face-to-face and electronic communications in maintaining social networks: The influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content. New Media and Society, 12(6), 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809353011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Transform. (2018). In Merriam-Webster online dictionary. Retrieved February 7, 2018 from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transform.
- Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2015). Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study. Media Psychology, 18(1), 74–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.838904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., Zgourou, E., et al. (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2016). Media effects: Theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Zalk, M. H. W., Branje, S. J. T., Denissen, J., Van Aken, M. A. G., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Who benefits from chatting, and why? The roles of extraversion and supportiveness in online chatting and emotional adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1202–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211409053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
- Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wright, K. B. (2012). Emotional support and perceived stress among college students using Facebook.com: An exploration of the relationship between source perceptions and emotional support. Communication Research Reports, 29(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.695957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar