Effects of Classroom Humor Climate and Acceptance of Humor Messages on Adolescents’ Expressions of Humor
- 759 Downloads
To adapt to dramatic changes from physical growth, physical development and the increasing demand of significant others, humor has been found to be an effective coping strategy. However, previous studies have found that adolescents start to express their humor styles with aggressive components which causes negative consequences, such as social anxiety and social loneliness. Therefore, the factors that influence adolescents’ humor styles, particularly negative ones, should be of concern.
The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the effects of the classroom humor climate and the effects of the personal acceptance of humor messages on adolescents’ expressions of humor and (2) to examine how the personal acceptance of humor messages moderates these relationships.
Four types of humor expressions based on the Taiwan Adolescent Humor Instruments were measured: self-deprecating, other-devaluing, body language, and witty response (Chiang et al. in Psychol Test 58:179–205, 2011). The current study used a cross-sectional design with data from a nationally representative random sample of 1718 students. The data were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling.
Adolescents’ acceptance of humor messages influenced their use of each type of humor, and the classroom climate also modestly influenced their use of humor. When the classroom climate favored self-deprecating/other-devaluing humor, and adolescents more positively accepted self-deprecating/other-devaluing humor, they engaged in more of that type of humor.
Adolescents’ acceptance of humor messages should be assessed to identify and reduce maladaptive humor climates and to facilitate a more positive humor style in the classroom by promoting appropriate social norms.
KeywordsClassroom climate Acceptance of humor Expression of humor
The study carried out an analysis of part of the 2007 data from the National Science Council supported (NSC96-2516-S-002-013-MY3). We would like to thank the 20 participating schools for providing venues and time for the survey, the students and their parents who were involved in the survey for their support, and the interviewers and supervisors that helped carry out the survey. Hsueh-Chih Chen is also acknowledged for his helpful comments on an earlier draft.
HHW and CYL conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, conducted the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; YCC supervised the study, assisted in data interpretation, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Human Subjects Approval Statement
This study was approved by the institutional review board of the College of Public Health of National Taiwan University.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communications. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Chiang, Y. C., Sheng, H. S., Wu, W. C., & Yen, L. L. (2014). Clusters of humor expression and related factors among junior high school students in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 289–310.Google Scholar
- Chiang, Y. C., Yen, L. L., Wu, W. C., Chiu, Y. C., Cheng, C. C., & Sheng, H. S. (2011). Development and compilation of Taiwan Adolescent Humor Instruments (TAHI). Psychological Testing, 58, 179–205. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Child Welfare League Foundation. (2007). Bullying survey among school children, Retrieved from www.children.org.tw/database_report.php?id=204&typeid=4&offset=0.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Evans, I. M., Harvey, S. T., Buckley, L., & Yan, E. (2009). Differentiating classroom climate concepts: Academic, management, and emotional environments. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 4(2), 131–146.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1928). Humour. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 9, 1–6.Google Scholar
- Gibb, K. (2010). Personal values. Relational Child and Youth Care Practice, 23, 40–42.Google Scholar
- Hetherington, E. M., & Parke, R. D. (2003). Child psychology: A contemporary viewpoint (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Ho, M. J., & Lin, S. H. (2000). The moderating effect of sense of humor to life stress and physical-mental health for junior high school students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 32, 123–156. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Jackson, D. N. (1996). Basic personality inventory (BPI). Port Huron: Sigma Assessment System, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kuiper, N. A., & Nicholl, S. (2004). Thoughts of feeling better? Sense of humor and physical health. Humor International Journal of Humor Research, 17(1/2), 37–66.Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Lin, Y. J., & Chiang, Y. C. (2015). Effect of social network indicator on bullied experience and mental health among junior high school student in Taiwan. In: Paper presented at the 28th World Congress of the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP), Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
- McAlister, A. L., Perry, C. L., & Parcel, G. S. (2008). How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social cognitive theory. In Karen Glanz, Barbara K. Rimer, & Kasisomayajula Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education (4th ed., pp. 169–188). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor, its origin and development. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., & du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
- Santrock, J. W. (2005). Adolescence (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1995). Classroom environment scale manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consultant Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Toronto: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar
- Wang, C. K., & Lo, K. Y. (2008). Cognitive representation of emotional intelligence: Similarity and difference between genders and cohorts. Research in Applied Psychology, 39, 215–251.Google Scholar
- Wei, H. S., Williams, J. H., Chen, J. K., & Chang, H. Y. (2010). The effects of individual characteristics, teacher practice, and school organizational factors on students’ bullying: A multilevel analysis of public middle schools in Taiwan. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(1), 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu, Y. T., Chiang, Y. C., Wu, W. C., & Yang, H. J. (2014). Effects of humor expression on physical, mental and social health among junior high school students in Taiwan. In: Paper presented at the Taiwan Public Health Association 2014 Annual Meeting and Exposition, Taipei City, Taiwan.Google Scholar
- Wyer, R. S. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Yen, L. L., Chiang, Y. C., Chiu, Y. C., Cheng, C. C., Wu, W. C., & Yang, H. J. (2008). The concept of humor and performance patterns among junior high school students: Results of focus group discussions. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 27, 519–529.Google Scholar