Protégés’ Personality Traits, Expectations, the Quality of the Mentoring Relationship and Adjustment: A Big Five Analysis
- 590 Downloads
Community-based mentoring interventions can benefit high-risk youth. However, meta-analyses suggest that these benefits may be conditioned by protégés’ personality.
Associations between protégés’ personality traits and mentoring expectations, the quality of the mentoring relationship, the perceived mentoring contribution, and levels of adjustment at the end of mentoring were explored using the Big Five model. In addition, the possible moderation of protégés’ personality traits on the relationship between the quality of the mentoring relationship and protégés’ level of adjustment at the end of the intervention and the perceived benefits of mentoring was explored.
Self-reports from protégés, parents, and teachers were used in a prospective research design. The sample consisted of 167 protégés (mean age = 9.58) from Perach, the largest community-based mentoring program in Israel.
Protégés’ agreeableness, extraversion, and openness were positively associated with their expectations. Agreeableness was positively associated with the quality of the relationship. Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness were positively associated with protégés’ social and academic adjustment at the end of mentoring, and with the perceived contribution of mentoring, whereas neuroticism and extraversion were negatively associated. Protégés’ personality traits moderated the correlations between the quality of the relationship and their conduct self-concept, as well as the parents’ perceived mentoring contribution.
This study highlights the contribution of protégés’ personality in shaping their ability to benefit from mentoring in terms of adjustment and perceived contribution of mentoring.
KeywordsYouth mentoring Psycho-social development Personality Protégés’ characteristics
This study was partially supported by the Israeli Association for Social Science and Education: Grant No. 28 for Ph.D. students.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. California: Sage.Google Scholar
- Caspi, A., & Shiner, R.L. (2006). Personality development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 300–365). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- de Tormes Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., et al. (2012). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin (on line publication). doi: 10.1037/a0029279.Google Scholar
- DuBois, D. L., & Karcehr, M. J. (2013). Youth mentoring: Progress and prospects for the 21st century. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), The handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 525–534). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Epstein, S. (1983). The mother–father–peer scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
- Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldner, L., & Scharf, M. (2013a). International and cross cultural aspects in youth mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), The Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 189–199). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (1985). Supplementary description of the self: perception for children revision of the perceived competence scale for children. Unpublished manuscript. University of Denver.Google Scholar
- Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risk and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, J. E., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social Policy Report, 23(3), 3–19.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, D. R., Moffett, A., Lieberman, L., & Dummer, G. M. (2005). Perceived competence of children with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 99(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
- Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4–12-year olds: A review. Clinical Child Family Psychology Review, 13(3), 254–274.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tinsley, H. E. A. (1982). Expectations about counseling. Unpublished test, Southern Illinois University at Carbonate Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
- Vaughn, B. E., Bost, K. K., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2008). Attachment and temperament: Additive and interactive influences on behavior, affect, and cognition during infancy and childhood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 192–216). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar