Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Utility of Clinicians Ratings of Anxiety Using the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinician ratings of anxiety hold the promise of clarifying discrepancies often found between child and parent reports of anxiety. The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician-administered instrument that assesses the frequency, severity, and impairment of common pediatric anxiety disorders and has been used as a primary outcome measure in several landmark treatment trials. However, no data on nonanxious youth have been published. The purpose of this study was to address this gap by examining clinician’s ratings of anxiety on the PARS in a volunteer sample of youth without anxiety disorders (n = 84; ages 7–12; 51% female, 75% Caucasian). The nonanxious sample was comprised of youth with (At-risk; n = 36) and without (Healthy; n = 48) anxious parents. Data were also used to evaluate the reliability (i.e., internal consistency), convergent, and divergent validity of the clinician-rated PARS. In addition, a receiver operating curve analysis was used to determine optimum cut off scores indicative of clinical levels of anxiety by comparing PARS scores between these nonanxious youth and a clinically anxious sample (n = 77) randomized in the Research Units of Pediatric Psychopharmacology (RUPP) anxiety study (RUPP 2001). Results indicated that anxious and nonanxious youth were significantly different on all PARS severity items. Optimum cutoff scores of 11.5 (5-item total score) and 17.5 (7-item total score) discriminated youth with and without anxiety disorders. Cronbach alphas for the Healthy and At-risk sample were .90 and .91 and .75 and .81 for the 5- and 7-item total PARS scores respectively, supporting the measure’s internal consistency among nonanxious youth. PARS total scores were positively correlated with other measures of anxiety (i.e., the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders) for the At-risk but not Healthy subsample. PARS scores were not significantly correlated with depressive symptoms (i.e., Children’s Depression Inventory). Overall, findings support the utility of clinician’s assessments of anxiety symptoms for nonanxious youth. Using the PARS can help facilitate determining whether a child’s anxiety level is more similar to those with or without an anxiety disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birmaher, B., Brent, D. A., Chiappetta, L., Bridge, J., Monga, S., & Baugher, M. (1999). Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): A replication study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(10), 1230–1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birmaher, B., Khetarpal, S., Brent, D., Cully, M., Balach, L., Kaufman, J., et al. (1997). The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): Scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(4), 545–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., & Donovan, J. E. (1994). Reliability and validity of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale in an adolescent sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(3), 354–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2004). A symptom-level examination of parent–child agreement in the diagnosis of anxious youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(7), 878–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, N. A., Rodrigue, J. R., & Geffken, G. R. (1994). Parent–child agreement on ratings of anxiety in children. Psychological Reports, 75(3), 1251–1260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G. S. (2009). The child anxiety prevention study (CAPS): Intervention model and primary outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 580–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G. S., & Riddle, M. (2005). Pediatric anxiety rating scale: Revisions and normative data. Groton: Grant from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G. S., Riddle, M., & Davies, M. (2006). Somatic symptoms in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(10), 1179–1187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 50–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani, J. H., & Orvaschel, H. (1990). A community sample of anxiety in children and adolescents. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(3), 313–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Flannery-Schroeder, E., Panichelli-Mindel, S., Southam-Gerow, M., Henin, A., & Warman, M. (1997). Therapy for youths with anxiety disorders: A second randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(3), 366–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (1991). Parent–child agreement in clinical assessment of anxiety and other psychopathology: A review. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 5(2), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s depression inventory (CDI) manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckman, J. F., Riddle, M. A., Hardin, M. T., Ort, S. I., Swartz, K. L., Stevenson, J., et al. (1989). The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale: Initial testing of a clinician-rated scale of tic severity. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(4), 566–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monga, S., Birmaher, B., Chiappetta, B. S., Brent, D., Kaufman, J., Bridge, J., et al. (2000). Screen for child anxiety-related emotional disorders (SCARED): Convergent and divergent validity. Depression and Anxiety, 12(2), 85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Mayer, B., van Brakel, A., Thissen, S., Moulaert, V., et al. (1998). The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED) and traditional childhood anxiety measures. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 29(4), 327–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K., & Winters, N. C. (2002). Ten-year review of rating scales. II: Scales for internalizing disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(6), 634–659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pintea, S., & Moldovan, R. (2009). The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: Fundamentals and applications in clinical psychology. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 9(1), 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poznanski, E. O., & Mokros, H. B. (1996). Children’s depression rating scale (CDRS-R). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M., Schniering, C. A., & Hudson, J. L. (2009). Anxiety disorders during childhood and adolescence: Origins and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 311–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Research Units of Pediatric Psychopharmacology Anxiety Study Group. (2001). Fluvoxamine for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(17), 1279–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology Anxiety Study Group. (2002). The pediatric anxiety rating scale (PARS): Development and psychometric properties. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(9), 1061–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scahill, L., Riddle, M. A., McSwiggin-Hardin, M., Ort, S. I., King, R. A., Goodman, W. K., et al. (1997). Children’s Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: Reliability and validity. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(6), 844–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, W., & Albano, A. (1996). The anxiety disorders interview schedule for children–IV (Child and parent versions). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, W. K., Saavedra, L. M., & Pina, A. A. (2001). Test-retest reliability of anxiety symptoms and diagnoses with anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: Child and parent versions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(8), 937–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walkup, J. T., Albano, A. M., Piacentini, J., Birmaher, B., Compton, S. N., Sherrill, J. T., et al. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(26), 2753–2766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH63427-02) awarded to the first author and by an unrestricted-investigator initiated research grant from Pfizer awarded to the first and third authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 550 North Broadway Suite 202, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA

    Golda S. Ginsburg, Courtney P. Keeton, Tess K. Drazdowski & Mark A. Riddle

Authors
  1. Golda S. Ginsburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Courtney P. Keeton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tess K. Drazdowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark A. Riddle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Golda S. Ginsburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginsburg, G.S., Keeton, C.P., Drazdowski, T.K. et al. The Utility of Clinicians Ratings of Anxiety Using the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS). Child Youth Care Forum 40, 93–105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9125-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9125-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation