Cell Biology and Toxicology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 33–43 | Cite as

Assessment of DNA sensitivity in peripheral blood leukocytes after occupational exposure to microwave radiation: the alkaline comet assay and chromatid breakage assay

  • Vera Garaj-Vrhovac
  • Višnja Oreščanin


DNA sensitivity in peripheral blood leukocytes of radar-facility workers daily exposed to microwave radiation and an unexposed control subjects was investigated. The study was carried out on clinically healthy male workers employed on radar equipment and antenna system service within a microwave field of 10 μW/cm2–20 mW/cm2 with frequency range of 1,250–1,350 MHz. The control group consisted of subjects of similar age. The evaluation of DNA damage and sensitivity was performed using alkaline comet assay and chromatid breakage assay (bleomycin-sensitivity assay). The levels of DNA damage in exposed subjects determined by alkaline comet assay were increased compared to control group and showed inter-individual variations. After short exposure of cultured lymphocytes to bleomycin cells of subjects occupationally exposed to microwave (MW) radiation responded with high numbers of chromatid breaks. Almost three times higher number of bleomycin-induced chromatid breaks in cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes were determined in comparison with control group. The difference in break per cell (b/c) values recorded between smokers and non-smokers was statistically significant in the exposed group. Regression analyses showed significant positive correlation between the results obtained with two different methods. Considering the correlation coefficients, the number of metaphase with breaks was a better predictor of the comet assay parameters compared to b/c ratio. The best correlation was found between tail moment and number of chromatid with breaks. Our results indicate that MW radiation represents a potential DNA-damaging hazard using the alkaline comet assay and chromatid breakage assay as sensitive biomarkers of individual cancer susceptibility.


DNA damage Comet assay Chromatid breakage assay Peripheral blood leukocytes Radar-facility workers 



I wish to thank BSc. Snježani Ramić for excellent technical assistance. This investigation was supported in part by the Croatian Ministry of Science and Technology (grant No.0022-0222148-2125).


  1. Brusick D, Albertini R, McRee ED, Peterson D, Williams G, Hanawalt P, Preston J. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency radiation. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1998;32:1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cloos J, Nieuwenhuis EJC, Boomsma DI, Kuik DE, van der Sterre MLT, Arwert F, Snow GB, Braakhuis BJM. Inherited susceptibility to bleomycin-induced chromatid breaks in cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999a;91:1125–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cloos J, Reid CBA, van der Sterre MLT, Tobi H, Leemans CR, Snow GB, Braakhuis BJM. A comparison of bleomycin-induced damage in lymphocytes and primary oral fibroblasts and keratinocytes in 30 subjects. Mutagenesis. 1999b;14:87–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins A, Dusinska M, Franklin M, Somorovska M, Petrovska H, Duthie S, Fillion L, Panayiotidis M, Raslova K, Vaughan N. Comet assay in human biomonitoring studies—reliability, validation, and applications. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;30:139–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Ambrosio G, Massa R, Scarfi MR, Zeni O. Cytogenetic studies in human blood lymphocytes following GMSK phase modulated microwave exposure. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23(1):7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garaj-Vrhovac V. Biological effect of microwave radiation. In: Benulič T, Serša G, Kovač V, editors. Advances in radiology and oncology. Ljubljana, Slowenia; 1992. p. 356–61.Google Scholar
  7. Garaj-Vrhovac V. Micronucleus assay and lymphocyte mitotic activity in risk assessment of occupational exposure to microwave radiation. Chemosphere. 1996;39(13):2301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garaj-Vrhovac V, Horvat D, Koren Z. The relationship between colony-forming ability, chromosome aberrations and incidence of micronuclei in V79 Chinese hamster cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res. 1991;263:143–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garaj-Vrhovac V, Fučić A, Pevalek-Kozlina B. The rate of elimination of chromosomal aberrations after accidental exposure to microwave radiation. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 1993;30:319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garaj-Vrhovac V, Kopjar N, Ražem D, Vekić B, Miljanić S, Ranogajec-Komor M. Application of the alkaline comet assay in biodosimetry: assessment of in vivo DNA damage in human peripheral leukocytes after a γ radiation incident. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2002;98(4):407–16.Google Scholar
  11. Garson OM, McRobert TL, Campbell LJ, Hocking BA, Gordon I. A chromosomal study of workers with long-term exposure to radio-frequency radiation. Med J Aust. 1991;155:289–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gichner T, Ptaček O, Stavreva DA, Wagner ED, Plewa MJ. A comparison of DNA repair using the comet assay in tobacco seedlings after exposure to alkylating agents or ionizing radiation. Mutat Res. 2000;470:1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Giloni L, Takeshita M, Johnson F, Iden C, Grollman AP. Bleoycin-induced strand-scission of DNA: mechanism of deoxyribose cleavage. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:8608–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagmar L, Bonassi S, Strömberg U, Brøgger A, Knudsen LE, Norppa H, Reuterwall C, ESCH. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer: a report from the European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health. Cancer Res 1998;58:4117–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsu TC. Genetic instability in the human population: a working hypothesis. Hereditas. 1983;98:1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Juutilainen J, Lang S. Genotoxic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of electromagnetic fields. Introduction and overview. Mutat Res. 1997;387:165–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kassie F, Parzefall W, Knasmüller S. Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: a new technique for human biomonitoring studies. Mutat Res. 2000;463:13–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khaidakov M, Bishop ME, Manjanatha MG, Lyn-Cook LE, Desai VG, Chen JJ, Aidoo A. Influence of dietary antioxidants on the mutagenicity of 712-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene and bleomycin in female rats. Mutat Res. 2001;480/481:163–70.Google Scholar
  19. Lai H, Singh NP. Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 1995;16:207–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lai H, Singh NP. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiations. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996;69:513–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lai H, Carino M, Singh NP. Melatonin and a spin-trap compound block radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells. Biolectromagnetics. 1997;18:446–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maes A, Verschaeve L, Arroyo A, De Wagter C, Vercruyssen L. In vitro cytogenetic effects of 2450 MHz waves on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Bioelectromagentics. 1993;14:495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maes A, Collier M, Vandonink S, Scarpa P, Verschaeve L. Cytogenetic effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Bioelectromagentics. 2000;21:589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malyapa RS, Ahem EW, Straube WL, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Roti Roti JL. Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation. Radiat Res. 1997a;148(6):608–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malyapa RS, Ahem EW, Straube WL, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Roti Roti JL. Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in the cellular phone communication frequency band (835.62 and 847.74 MHz). Radiat Res. 1997b;148(6):618–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malyapa RS, Ahem EW, Bi C, Straube WL, LaRegina M, Pickard WF, Roti Roti JL. DNA damage in rat brain cells after in vivo exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation and various methods of euthanasia. Radiat Res. 1998;149(6):637–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McNamee JP, Bellier PV, Gajda GB, Miller SM, Lemay EP, Lavallee BF, Marro L, Thansandote A. DNA damage and micronucleus induction in human leukocytes after acute in vitro exposure to a 1.9 GHz continuous-wave radiofrequency field. Radiat Res. 2002a;158:523–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McNamee JP, Bellier PV, Gajda GB, Lavallee BF, Lemay EP, Marro L, Thansandote A. DNA damage in human leukocytes after acute in vitro exposure to a 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency field. Radiat Res. 2002b;158:534–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meltz ML. Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity and transformation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;6:196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meltz ML, Eagan P, Erwin DN. Proflavin and microwave radiation: absence of a mutagenic interaction. Bioelectromagnetics. 1990;11:149–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Michalska J, Motykiewicz G, Kalinowska E, Chorazy M. Bleomycin sensitivity test in the exposed and reference human populations. Mutat Res. 1998;418:43–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Møller P, Knudsen LE, Loft S, Wallin H. The comet assay as rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to DNA-damaging agents and effect of confounding factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2000;9:1005–15.Google Scholar
  33. Povirk LF. Bleomycin-induced mutagenesis in repackaged lambda phage: base substitution hotspots at the sequence C–G–C–C. Mutat Res. 1987;180:1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Povirk LF, Goldberg IH. Base substitution mutations induced in the cI gene of lambda phage by neocarzinostatin chromophore at the sequence AGC. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:1417–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BR. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(7):881–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savitz D, Calle E. Leukemia and occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields: review of epidemiologic surveys. J Occup Med. 1987;29:47–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaaper RM, Kunkel TA, Loeb LA. Infidelity of DNA synthesis associated with bypass of apurinic sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1983;80:487–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh NP. Microgels for estimation of DNA strand breaks, DNA protein crosslinks and apoptosis. Mutat Res. 2000;455:111–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 1988;175:184–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker JD, Preston RJ. Chromosome aberrations, micronuclei, aneuploidy, sister chromatid exchanges, and cancer risk assessment. Mutat Res. 1996;365:147–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Verschaeve L. Genetic effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;207:336–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verschaeve L, Maes A. Genetic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of radiofrequency fields. Mutat Res. 1998;410:141–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vijayalaxmi BZ, Obe G. Controversial cytogenetic observations in mammalian somatic cells exposed to radio frequency radiation. Radiat Res. 2004;162:481–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vijayalaxmi BZ, Leal BZ, Meltz ML, Pickard WF, Bisht KS, Roti Roti JL, Straube WL, Moros EG. Cytogenetics studies in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to radiofrequency radiation at a cellular telephone frequency (835.62 MHz, FMDA). Radiat Res. 2001;155(1):113–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vijayalaxmi BZ, Sasser LB, Morris JE, Wilson BW, Anderson LE. Genotoxic potential of 1.6 GHz wireless communication signal: in vivo two-year bioassay. Radiat Res. 2003;159:558–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson DM, Thompson LH. Molecular mechanisms of sister-chromatid exchange. Mutat Res. 2007;616:11–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yost MG. Occupational health effects of nonionizing radiation. Occup Med. 1992;7:543–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zotti-Martelli L, Peccatori M, Scarpato R, Migliore L. Induction of micronuclei in human lymphocytes exposed in vitro to microwave radiation. Mutat Res. 2000;472:51–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mutagenesis UnitInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational HealthZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Institut “Ruđer Bošković”ZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations