Catalysis Letters

, Volume 145, Issue 7, pp 1446–1456 | Cite as

Catalytic Reduction of NOX Over TiO2–Graphene Oxide Supported with MnOX at Low Temperature

  • Wei Su
  • Xining Lu
  • Shaohua Jia
  • Juan Wang
  • Hongzhi Ma
  • Yi Xing


TiO2–graphene oxide (TiO2–GO) nanocomposites were prepared by the sol–gel method with different mass ratios of GO. The MnOX active components were loaded by means of ultrasonic impregnation. The catalysts exhibited excellent physical structures and electron transfer properties, which favored the catalytic activity. All of the catalysts were characterized by FESEM, XRD, TEM, BET, FT-IR, and XPS. The catalytic reduction activities of NOX were studied under low temperature conditions using ammonia as the reductant. Results indicated GO formation in the TiO2–GO supports, which reveals that TiO2–GO can be readily indexed as anatase TiO2 in all samples. Various valence states of manganese species coexisted in the MnOX/TiO2–GO catalysts. Non-stoichiometric (MnOX/Mn) on the surface of the composite catalysts was particularly beneficial to electron transfer, resulting in good redox performance. The optimum mass ratio of Mn in MnOX/TiO2–0.8 % GO was 9 wt%, and catalyst with this amount of Mn exhibited good resistance to H2O and SO2. All of the samples showed excellent N2 selectivity.

Graphical Abstract

The surface of the GO sheets is covered by a uniform layer of MnOX which increasing the activity of the catalyst by 9 % MnOX/TiO2–0.8 % GO.


Graphene oxide TiO2–GO Selective catalytic reduction Low temperature Manganese oxides 


  1. 1.
    Fan EY, Wei PB, Sui GR et al (2012) Preparation of Mn-Ce-Ox denitration catalyst and its regeneration performance. Environ Sci Technol 35(9):40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hao J, Wang L, Shen M et al (2007) Air quality impacts of power plant emissions in Beijing. Environ Pollut 147(2):401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Busca G, Larrubia MA, Arrighi L et al (2005) Catalytic abatement of NOX: chemical and mechanistic aspects. Catal Today 107–108:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Busca G, Lietti L, Ramis G et al (1998) Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOX by ammonia over oxide catalysts: a review. Appl Catal B Environ 18(1–2):1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yao G, Gui K, Wang F (2010) Low-temperature de-NOX by selective catalytic reduction based on iron-based catalysts. Chem Eng Technol 33(7):1093–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park TS, Jeong SK, Hong SH et al (2001) Selective catalytic reduction of nirogen oxides with NH3 over natural manganese ore at low temperature. Ind Eng Chem Res 40(21):4491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qi G, Yang RT (2003) Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over iron and manganese oxides supported on titania. Appl Catal B 44(3):217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ettireddy PR, Ettireddy N, Mamedov S et al (2007) Surface characterization studies of TiO2 supported manganese oxide catalysts for low temperature SCR of NO with NH3. Appl Catal B 76(1–2):123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boningari T, Panagiotis GS (2011) Co-doping a metal (Cr, Fe Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ce, and Zr) on Mn/TiO2 catalyst and its effect on the selective reduction of NO with NH3 at low-temperatures. Appl Catal B 110(2):195Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu FD, He H, Zhang CB et al (2011) Mechanism of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over environmental-friendly iron titanate catalyst. Catal Today 175(1):18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoshikawa M, Yasutake A, Mochida I (1998) Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOX by metal oxides supported on active carbon fibers. Appl Catal A Gen 173(2):239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang X, Hao J, Yi H et al (2007) Low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over AC/C supported manganese-based monolithic catalysts. Catal Today 126(3–4):406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pradhan BK, Sandle NK (1999) Effect of different oxidizing agent treatments on the surface properties of activated carbons. Carbon 37(8):1323–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valdés-Solís T, Marbán G, Fuertes AB (2003) Low-temperature SCR of NOX with NH3 over carbon-ceramic supported catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 46(2):261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao XY, Ding KQ (2009) Preparation of nano TiO2/CNTs composite particles and the electrochemical measurement on its ITO film electrode. J Heibei Norm Univ 33(2):214–219Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang D, Rochette J, Sacher E (2005) Functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by mild aqueous sonication. J Phys Chem B 109(16):7788–7794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hummers WS, Offerman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. Carbon 80:1339Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singoredjo L, Korver R, Kapteijn F et al (1992) Alumina supported manganese oxides for the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Appl Catal B 1(4):297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen C, Cai WM, Long MC et al (2010) Synthesis of visible-light responsive graphene oxide/TiO2 composites with p/n heterojunction. ACS Nano 4(11):6425–6432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    wang W, Yu J, Xiang Q et al (2012) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of hierarchical macro/mesoporous TiO2-graphene composites for photodegradation of acetone in air. Appl Catal B Environ 119:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tang X, Hao J, Yi H et al (2007) Low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over AC/C supported manganese-based monolithic catalysts. Catal Today 126(3–4):406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu P, Li C, Zeng G et al (2010) Low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO by activated carbon fiber loading lanthanum oxide and ceria. Appl Catal B Environ 96(1–2):157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Planeix JM, Coustel N, Coq B et al (1994) Application of carbon nanotubes as supports in heterogeneous catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 116(17):7935–7936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao Erping, Wang Wenzhong, Shang Meng et al (2011) Synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic performance of graphene-Bi2WO6 composite. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:2887–2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2009) Photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets on TiO2 thin film for photoinactivation of bacteria in solar light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 113(47):20214–20220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiang Q, Jiaguo Y, Jaroniec M (2011) Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of graphene-modified titania nanosheets. J Nanocale 3:3670–3678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee JY, Hong SH, Cho SP et al (2006) The study of deNOX catalyst in low temperature using nano-sized supports. Curr Appl Phys 6(6):996–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xining L, Song C, Jia S et al (2015) Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOX with NH3 over cerium and manganese oxides supported on TiO2-graphene. Chem Eng J 260:776–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ponce S, Peña MA, Fierro JLG (2000) Surface properties and catalytic performance in methane combustion of Sr-substituted lanthanum manganites. Appl Catal B Environ 24(3–4):193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Su
    • 1
  • Xining Lu
    • 1
  • Shaohua Jia
    • 2
  • Juan Wang
    • 1
  • Hongzhi Ma
    • 1
  • Yi Xing
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Educational Ministry for High Efficient Mining and Safety in Metal MineUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of EnvironmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations