Catalysis Letters

, Volume 129, Issue 1–2, pp 130–134 | Cite as

Adsorption of Homopolymer Chains on a Strip-Patterned Surface: A Monte Carlo Study

  • Piotr Adamczyk
  • Piotr Romiszowski
  • Andrzej Sikorski


In this study we investigated the process of chemisorption of polymers on solid surfaces. The formation of a strongly adsorbed polymer film was studied by Monte Carlo simulations. The adsorbing planar surface was patterned with strip-like repulsive sites. The polymer chains were represented by a sequence of schematically constructed objects (united atoms) and we considered star-branched macromolecules with f = 3 arms of equal length. The chains were studied at good solvent conditions and thus the excluded volume was the only potential of interaction between the polymers. A Metropolis-like sampling algorithm was employed in order to calculate the properties of the adsorbed chains. The influence of the chain length, the system density and the type of the pattern on the adsorbing surface on size of chains and the structure of the polymer film were determined and discussed. We found that the roughness of the polymer film surface depends non-monotonics on the number of polymer beads in the system. The shape of this surface reflects the pattern imposed on the substrate.


Adsorption Branched polymers Monte Carlo method Patterned surfaces 



The computational part of this work was done using the computer cluster at the Computing Center of the Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw.


  1. 1.
    Fleer GJ, Cohen Stuart MA, Scheutjens JMHM, Cosgrove T, Vincent B (1993) Polymers at interfaces. Chapman & Hall, LondoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scheutjens JMHM, Fleer GJ (1979) J Phys Chem 83:1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scheutjens JMHM, Fleer GJ (1980) J Phys Chem 84:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muthukumar M (1995) J Chem Phys 103:4723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng H, Berg MC, Rubner MF, Hammond PT (2004) Langmuir 20:7215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen KM, Jiang X, Kimerling LC, Hammond PT (2000) Langmuir 16:7825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sumithra K, Baumgaertner A (1998) J Chem Phys 109:1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sumithra K, Straube E (2005) J Chem Phys 125 (art. no. 164701)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sumithra K, Straube E (2007) J Chem Phys 127 (art. no. 114908)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhattacharya S, Hsu H-P, Milchev A, Rostiashvili VG, Vilgis TA (2008) Macromolecules 41:9220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kłos JS, Sommer JU (2008) J Chem Phys 128 (art. no. 164908)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sikorski A (2001) Macromol Theory Simul 10:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sikorski A (2002) Macromol Theory Simul 11:359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sikorski A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J (1994) Macromol Theory Simul 3:715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romiszowski P, Sikorski A (2005) J Chem Phys 123 (art. no. 104905)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grest GS, Fetters LJ, Huang JS (1996) Adv Chem Phys 94:67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halperin A, Joanny JF (1991) J Phys II 1:623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sikorski A (1993) Makromol Chem Theory Simul 2:309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Shaughnessy B, Vavylonis D (2003) Phys Rev Lett 90 (art. no. 056103)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erban R, Chapman SJ (2007) J Stat Phys 127:1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piotr Adamczyk
    • 1
  • Piotr Romiszowski
    • 1
  • Andrzej Sikorski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of WarsawWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations