Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of tectonic epikeratoplasty with use of ethanol-preserved corneal grafts for the management of perforated corneal melts. The present retrospective case series includes 10 eyes which underwent tectonic epikeratoplasty for perforated corneal melts. The stromal remainders of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft preparation were stored in 95% ethanol and used as emergency tectonic grafts for restoring globe integrity after sterile and infectious perforated corneal melts. In 6 cases with subtotal corneal melt, DMEK remainders (endothelium-denuded corneoscleral buttons) were used for ‘limbus to limbus’ tectonic epikeratoplasty and in 4 cases DSAEK remainders (anterior stroma) were used to seal focal perforated melts. Graft storage time was 5.1 ± 4.9 (ranging from 0.5 to 17) months. The surgeries were successful in all cases with restitution of the globe integrity. During the postoperative course 4 cases developed a graft melt (corneoscleral button for limbus to limbus tectonic epikeratoplasty, n = 3; lamellar patch, n = 1) within 2–6 months after the initial procedure. Three patients underwent successful repeat tectonic epikeratoplasty. In the fourth case of graft melt the globe was enucleated due to underlying expulsive haemorrhage and severe pain. The short-term results of the present case series suggest that the use of ethanol-stored stromal remainder of donor corneas after endothelial keratoplasty is an efficient temporary measure for tectonic restoration of perforated corneas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang M, Mehta JS, Arundhati A et al (2009) Anterior lamellar keratoplasty over penetrating keratoplasty for optical, therapeutic, and tectonic indications: a case series. Am J Ophthalmol 147:697–702
Ang M, Mehta JS, Sng CC et al (2012) Indications, outcomes, and risk factors for failure in tectonic keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119:1311–1319
Anshu A, Parthasarathy A, Mehta JS et al (2009) Outcomes of therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for advanced infectious keratitis: a comparative study. Ophthalmology 116:615–623
Armitage WJ (2011) Preservation of human cornea. Transfus Med Hemother 38:143–147
Bhatt PR, Lim LT, Ramaesh K (2007) Therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty for corneal perforations. Eye (Lond) 21:1168–1173
Chang SW, Chou SF, Wang YH (2006) Ethanol treatment induces significant cell death in porcine corneal fibroblasts. Cornea 25:1072–1079
Chen W, Lin Y, Zhang X et al (2010) Comparison of fresh corneal tissue versus glycerin-cryopreserved corneal tissue in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:775–781
Chu HS, Hsieh MC, Chen YM et al (2014) Anterior corneal buttons from DSAEK donor tissue can be stored in optisol GS for later use in tectonic lamellar patch grafting. Cornea 33:555–558
Dailey JR, Rosenwasser GO (1994) Viability of bacteria in glycerin and ethanol preserved sclera. J Refract Corneal Surg 10:38–40
Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachmann BO et al (2011) Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients: a new strategy to reduce corneal tissue cost and shortage. Ophthalmology 118:294–301
Kapur R, Tu EY, Pendland SL et al (2006) The effect of temperature on the antimicrobial activity of optisol-GS. Cornea 25:319–324
Khodadoust A, Quinter AP (2003) Microsurgical approach to the conjunctival flap. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1189–1193
Kymionis GD, Plaka AD, Diakonis VF et al (2013) Cross-linking as an adjuvant treatment for tectonic corneal lamellar graft preparation. Open Ophthalmol J 7:79–81
Lie JT, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Ham L et al (2010) More efficient use of donor corneal tissue with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two lamellar keratoplasty procedures with one donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1265–1266
Lin HC, Ong SJ, Chao AN (2012) Eye preservation tectonic graft using glycerol-preserved donor cornea. Eye (Lond) 26:1446–1450
Oh JY, Yu JM, Ko JH (2013) Analysis of ethanol effects on corneal epithelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3852–3856
Pels E, Beele H, Claerhout I (2008) Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage. Int Ophthalmol 28:155–163
Portnoy SL, Insler MS, Kaufman HE (1989) Surgical management of corneal ulceration and perforation. Surv Ophthalmol 34:47–58
Prabhasawat P, Tesavibul N, Komolsuradej W (2001) Single and multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent corneal epithelial defect with and without stromal thinning and perforation. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1455–1463
Shapiro MS, Friend J, Thoft RA (1981) Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:135–142
Sharma A, Kaur R, Kumar S et al (2003) Fibrin glue versus N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in corneal perforations. Ophthalmology 110:291–298
Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K (2003) Therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty for cornea perforation. Am J Ophthalmol 135:896–897
Tuli SS, Schultz GS, Downer DM (2007) Science and strategy for preventing and managing corneal ulceration. Ocul Surf 5:23–39
Turner SJ, Johnson Z, Corbett M et al (2010) Scleral autoplasty for the repair of corneal perforations: a case series. Br J Ophthalmol 94:669–670
Wilson SL, Sidney LE, Dunphy SE et al (2013) Keeping an eye on decellularized corneas: a review of methods. Charact Appl J Funct Biomater 4:114–161
Yalniz-Akkaya Z, Burcu A, Doğan E et al (2015) Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for infectious and non-infectious corneal ulcers. Int Ophthalmol 35:193–200
Yao Y-F, Zhang Y-M, Zhou P et al (2003) Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in severe fungal keratitis using cryopreserved donor corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 87:543–547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazaridis, A., Brouzas, D., Sekundo, W. et al. Tectonic epikeratoplasty with ethanol-stored donor corneas. Cell Tissue Bank 19, 637–644 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-018-9714-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-018-9714-1