Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 227–233 | Cite as

Lyophilized xenograft: a case series of histological analysis of biopsies

  • Tiango Aguiar Ribeiro
  • Caroline Coussirat
  • Fernando Pagnussato
  • Cristiano Valter Diesel
  • Fernando Castilla de Souza Macedo
  • Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo
  • Carlos Roberto GaliaEmail author
Article

Abstract

The reconstruction of an acetabular bone defect is one of the most important aspects of revision total hip arthroplasty surgery. It can be done by the use of grafts. Therefore, many kinds of grafts may be used and lyophilized xenograft is an alternative example. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the histological findings of lyophilized bovine xenografts used in previous total hip arthroplasty revision surgery. A case series was carried out from July 2000 to April 2013 with the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee. Fourteen subjects were analyzed. Of these, 64.3 % were female. The average age of the patients was 52.36 ± 18.55. Neoformed bone was present in 85.7 % of subjects, and constituted 61.79 % of the total bone matrix area. The diagnosis of xenograft absorption was present in 12 subjects. A strong inverse correlation between the percentage of neoformed bone and the percentage of xenograft in the total bone matrix by analysis of biopsies was found by the Pearson test (p = 0.001). No inflammatory response was found in the clinical status of the patients or in the histological analysis. Lyophilized bovine xenograft shown to be safe until the present moment, with acceptable results. Most of the cases presented new bone formation as expected (considered values greater than 30 %) and for this reason the xenograft has proven to be an osteoconductive compatible scaffold/trellis for the bone ingrowth. Therefore, it can be considered an alternative to other bone grafts in the treatment of bone loss.

Keywords

Freeze drying Xenograft Biopsy Transplantation Heterologous Lophilized Bovine bone Total hip arthroplasty Revision arthroplasty 

References

  1. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL, Davino NA (1996) Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:300–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckup J, Salinas EA, Valle AG, Boettner F (2013) Treatment of large acetabular defects: a surgical technique utilizing impaction grafting into a metallic mesh. HSS J 9:242–246. doi: 10.1007/s11420-013-9350-z CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buttaro M, Araujo GS, Araujo ES, Comba F, Piccaluga F (2008a) Viability of impacted bone allografts under metal mesh at the calcar in revision surgery of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:228–231. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.19921 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F (2008b) Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2482–2490. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0442-x CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell DG, Oakeshott RD (1995) Bone allograft banking in South Australia. Aust N Z J Surg 65:865–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Comba F, Buttaro M, Pusso R, Piccaluga F (2006) Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:865–869. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17227 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Conn RA, Peterson LFA, Stauffer RN, Ilstrup D (1985) Management of acetabular deficiency; long-term results of bone-grafting the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 9:451–452Google Scholar
  8. Drosos GI, Kazakos KI, Kouzoumpasis P, Verettas DA (2007) Safety and efficacy of commercially available demineralised bone matrix preparations: a critical review of clinical studies. Injury 38(Suppl 4):S13–S21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Farhat HL, Silva MRDd, Lazaretti-Castro M, Verreschi ITN (1999) Evolução da displasia fibrosa óssea na síndrome de McCune Albright. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia and Metabologia 43:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:454–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedlaender GE (1991) Bone allografts: the biological consequences of immunological events. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1119–1122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Galia CR, Macedo CA, Rosito R, Mello TM (2005) Uso de enxerto ósseo homólogo e heterólogo em diáfise femural de ratos: comparação entre enxerto ósseo congelado e liofilizado. Rev Bras Ortop 40:141–146Google Scholar
  13. Galia CR, Macedo CA, Rosito R, Mello TM, Camargo LM, Moreira LF (2008) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bovine bone biocompatibility. Clinics 63:801–806CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Galia CR, Macedo CA, Rosito R, Camargo LM, Marinho DR, Moreira LF (2009a) Femoral and acetabular revision using impacted nondemineralized freeze-dried bone allografts. J Orthop Sci 14:259–265. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1322-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Galia CR, Macedo CAdS, Rosito R, Moreira LF (2009b) Osteointegração de enxertos liofilizados impactados. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira 17:24–28. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522009000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Health NIo (2004) ImageJ Disclaimer. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. Accessed 01 Apr 2013
  17. Heliotis M, Tsiridis EE (2001) Fresh frozen bone in femoral impaction grafting: can developments in bone regeneration improve on this? Med Hypotheses 57:675–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Horowitz MC, Friedlaender GE (1987) Immunologic aspects of bone transplantation. A rationale for future studies. Orthop Clin N Am 18:227–233Google Scholar
  19. Horowitz MC, Friedlaender GE, Qian HY (1996) The immune response: the efferent arm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 326:25–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kakiuchi M, Ono K, Nishimura A, Shiokawa H (1996) Preparation of bank bone using defatting, freeze-drying and sterilisation with ethylene oxide gas. Part 1. Experimental evaluation of its efficacy and safety. Int Orthop 20:142–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Knaepler H, Laubach S, Gotzen L (1990) [The bone bank–a standardized procedure? Results of a federal survey of German surgical clinics] Der Chirurg. Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 61:833–836Google Scholar
  22. Ledford CK, Nunley JA II, Viens NA, Lark RK (2013) Bovine xenograft failures in pediatric foot reconstructive surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 33:458–463. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318287010d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lind M, Krarup N, Mikkelsen S, Horlyck E (2002) Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years’ follow-up. J Arthroplast 17:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maffulli N, Loppini M, Longo UG, Denaro V, Oliva F (2013) Bovine xenograft locking Puddu plate versus tricalcium phosphate spacer non-locking Puddu plate in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a prospective double-cohort study. Int Orthop 37:819–826. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1817-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer S, Floerkemeier T, Windhagen H (2008) Histological osseointegration of Tutobone: first results in human. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:539–544. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0402-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Morax S, Hurbli T, Smida R (1993) Bovine heterologous bone graft in orbital surgery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 38:445–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Palmer SH, Gibbons CL, Athanasou NA (1999) The pathology of bone allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:333–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosito R, Galia CR, Macedo CA, Moreira LF, Quaresma LM, Palma HM (2008) Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device. Clinics 63:509–514CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schnurer SM, Gopp U, Kuhn KD, Breusch SJ (2003) Bone substitutes. Der Orthopade 32:2–10. doi: 10.1007/s00132-002-0407-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Gardeniers JW, Huiskes R (1998) Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement. A 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:391–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schreurs BW, Busch VJ, Welten ML, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW (2004) Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2385–2392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shibuya N, Jupiter DC, Clawson LD, La Fontaine J (2012) Incorporation of bovine-based structural bone grafts used in reconstructive foot surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 51:30–33. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Slooff TJ, Schimmel JW, Buma P (1993) Cemented fixation with bone grafts. Orthop Clin N Am 24:667–677Google Scholar
  34. Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J (1996) Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:108–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sugihara S, van Ginkel AD, Jiya TU, van Royen BJ, van Diest PJ, Wuisman PI (1999) Histopathology of retrieved allografts of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:336–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wenz B, Oesch B, Horst M (2001) Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. Biomaterials 22:1599–1606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams A, Szabo RM (2004) Bone transplantation. Orthopedics 27:488–495; quiz 496–487Google Scholar
  38. Younger EM, Chapman MW (1989) Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 3:192–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiango Aguiar Ribeiro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Caroline Coussirat
    • 3
  • Fernando Pagnussato
    • 3
    • 4
  • Cristiano Valter Diesel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fernando Castilla de Souza Macedo
    • 2
  • Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo
    • 2
  • Carlos Roberto Galia
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em MedicinaCirurgia – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)Porto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Banco de Multitecidos do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)Porto AlegreBrazil
  4. 4.Curso de BiomedicinaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations