Wrapped omentum with periosteum concurrent with adipose derived adult stem cells for bone tissue engineering in dog model
Adipose derived adult stem cells (ASCs) are multipotent cells that are able to differentiate into osteoblasts in presence of certain factors. The histological characteristics of periosteum makes it a specific tissue with a unique capacity to be engineered. Higher flexibility of the greater omentum is useful for reconstructive surgery. These criteria make it suitable for tissue engineering. The present study was designed to evaluate bone tissue engineering with periosteal free graft concurrent with ASCs and pedicle omentum in dog model. Twelve young female indigenous dogs were used in this experiment. In omental group (n = 4), end of omentum was wrapped by periosteum of the radial bone in abdomen of each dog. In omental-autogenously ASCs group (n = 4), 1 ml of ASCs was injected into the wrapped omentum with periosteum while in omental-allogenously ASCs group (n = 4), 1 ml of allogenous ASCs was injected. Lateral view radiographs were taken from the abdominal cavity postoperatively at the 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th weeks post-surgery. Eight weeks after operation the dogs were re-anesthetized and the wrapped omenum by periosteum in all groups was found and removed for histopathological evaluation. Our results showed that omentum–periosteum, omental-periosteum-autogenous ASCs and omental-periosteum-allogenous ASCs groups demonstrated bone tissue formation in the abdominal cavity in dog model. The radiological, macroscopical and histological findings of the present study by the end of 8 weeks post-surgery indicate bone tissue engineering in all three groups in an equal level. The present study has shown that the wrapped omentum with periosteum concurrent with ASCs (autogenous or allogenous ASCs) lead to a favorable bone tissue formation. We suggested that it may be useful when pedicle graft omentum used concurrent with periosteum in the bone defect reconstruction, and this phenomenon should be studied in future.
KeywordsASCs Omentum Periosteum Bone tissue engineering
The authors would like to thank the Iranian National Science Foundation for their financial support and cooperation.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
- Cohen J, Pierre L (1955) Bone and cartilage formation by periosteum assay of experimental autogenous grafts. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 37(4):717–730Google Scholar
- Dragoo JL, Samimi B, Zhu M, Hame SL, Thomas BJ, Lieberman JR, Hedrick MH, Benhaim P (2003) Tissue-engineered cartilage and bone using stem cells from human infrapatellar fat pads. J Bone Jt Surg British Vol 85(5):740Google Scholar
- Emery SE, Brazinski MS, Koka A, Bensusan JS, Stevenson S (1994) The biological and biomechanical effects of irradiation on anterior spinal bone grafts in a canine model. J Bone Jt Surg 76(4):540Google Scholar
- Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M (2003) Periosteal cells in bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 9(4, Supplement 1):45–64Google Scholar
- Kos J, Nadinić V, Huljev D, Nadinić I, Turčić J, Košuta D, Anić T, Babić T, Vnuk D, Kreszinger M, Smolec O (2006) Healing of bone defect by application of free transplant of greater omentum. Veterinarski Arhiv 76(5):367–379Google Scholar
- McKibbin B (1978) The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Jt Surg British Vol 60(2):150Google Scholar
- Pearce SG (2007) Animal models for bone repair. Eur Cells Mater 14(Suppl 1):42Google Scholar