Skip to main content

“They’ll Give You a Second Chance”: Perceptions of Youth and Caregivers Regarding Their Experiences in a Community-Based Mental Health System of Care

Abstract

Child-and-family-centered systems of care and the inclusion of child, youth, and family voice represent an alternative to traditional, authoritarian approaches to children’s mental health treatment. Although much has been written about the centrality of child, youth, and family voice in creating responsive and effective mental health systems, the literature contains limited research highlighting the viewpoints of youth and caregivers themselves who have participated in systems of care. Our exploratory study seeks to narrow that gap. Utilizing eight semi-structured youth and caregiver interviews, we assessed the perceptions of youth and their caregivers participating in a community-based mental health system of care. Five primary themes emerged. The families we interviewed described negative previous experiences with mental health treatment and a strong sense of satisfaction with the care they received using a system of care approach. In addition, they expressed appreciation of the quality of relationships developed as a part of their treatment, felt individualized services made treatment more personally meaningful, and were empowered to act as active agents in obtaining future mental health treatment and achieving life goals. Implications for practice and future research are discussed, with the goal that the insights gleaned from our exploratory study can be used to inform future research and practice efforts seeking to incorporate child, youth, and family voice into children’s mental health services.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Allen, R., & Petr, C. (1996). Towards developing standards and measurements for family-centered practice in family support programs. In G. Singer, L. Powers, & A. Olson (Eds.), Family support policy and America’s caregiving families: Innovations in public private partnerships. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, K. D., Lee, B. R., Daleiden, E. L., Lindsey, M., Brandt, N. E., & Chorpita, B. F. (2015). The common elements of engagement in children’s mental health services: Which elements for which outcomes? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44(1), 30–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bickman, L., Lambert, E. W., Andrade, A. R., & Penaloza, R. V. (2000). The Fort Bragg continuum of care for children and adolescents: Mental health outcomes over five years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 710–716.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruns, E. J., Suter, J. C., Force, M. M., & Burchard, J. D. (2005). Adherence to wraparound principles and association with outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(4), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns, B. J., Farmer, E., Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Behar, L. (1996). A randomized trial of case management for youths with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(4), 476–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Mental health surveillance among childrenUnited States, 20052011. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6202a1.htm.

  7. Champine, R. B., Schreier, A., Whitson, M. L., & Kaufman, J. S. (2019). Comparing youth and caregiver experiences in a school-based system of care. Journal of Family Social Work, 23(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2019.1681334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, T. S., Gavazzi, S. M., Scheer, S. D., Kwon, I. A., Lammers, A., Fristad, M. A., & Uppal, R. (2011). Measuring family caregiver perceptions of support in caring for children and youth with mental health concerns. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(5), 500–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Friesen, B. J., Koroloff, N. M., Walker, J. S., & Briggs, H. E. (2011). Family and youth voice in systems of care: The evaluation of influence. Best Practices in Mental Health, 7(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Golan, M. (2014). Parenting and the parallel processes in parents’ counseling supervision for eating related problems. Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 19(2), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutierrez, L. M., Parsons, R., & Cox, E. O. (1990). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawley, K. M., & Garland, A. F. (2008). Working alliance in adolescent outpatient therapy: Youth, parent and therapist reports and associations with therapy outcomes. Child & Youth Care Forum, 37, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-008-9050-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Head, A. (1998). The child’s voice in child and family social work decision making: The perspective of a guardian ad litem. Child and Family Social Work, 3, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins, B. (2017). Reinventing human services. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315128313.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Hogan, M. F. (2003). New Freedom Commission Report: The President’s New Commission Report: Recommendations to transform mental health care in America. Psychiatric Services, 54(11), 1467.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald, K., Sundaram, V., Bravata, D., Lewis, R., Lin, N., … Owens, D. (2007) Care Coordination. In S. McDonald, R. Wachter, & D. Owens (Eds.), Quality gap: A critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  19. Mendenhall, A. N., & Mount, K. (2011). Parents of children with mental illness: A look at caregiver strain and caregiver-focused interventions. Families in Society, 92(2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olin, S. S., Hoagwood, K. E., Rodriguez, J., Ramos, B., Burton, G., Penn, M., … Jensen, P. S. (2010). The application of behavior change theory to family-based services: Improving parent empowerment in children’s mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 462–470.

  21. Osher, T. W., & Osher, D. M. (2002). The paradigm shift to true collaboration with families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Owens, P. L., Hoagwood, K., Horwitz, S. M., Leaf, P. J., Poduska, J. M., Kellam, S. G., & Ialongo, N. S. (2002). Barriers to children’s mental health services. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(6), 731–738.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Padgett, D. K. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods in social work knowledge development. Social Work, 54(2), 101–105.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rubenstein, H., & Lawler, S. (1990). Toward the psychosocial empowerment of women. Affilia, 5(3), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Russell, S., & McCloskey, C. (2016). Parent perceptions of care received by children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(1), 21–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snyder, E. H., Lawrence, C. N., & Dodge, K. A. (2012). The impact of system of care support in adherence to wraparound principles in child and family teams in child welfare in North Carolina. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 639–647.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taber, B. J., Leibert, T. W., & Agaskar, V. R. (2011). Relationships among client-therapist personality congruence, working alliance, and therapeutic outcome. Psychotherapy, 48(4), 376–380.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Teyber, E. (2006). Interpersonal process in psychotherapy: An integrative model (5th ed.). Belmont CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wald, H. P., Zubritsky, C. D., & Jaquette, N. (2014). Measuring system of care core values in a behavioral health system of care. Community Mental Health Journal, 50, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-013-9639-x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Walker, J. S., & Bruns, E. J. (2007). Wraparound—Key information, evidence, and endorsements. Retrieved from http://www.rtc.pdx.edu/nwi/wraparound%20evidence%20recognition%20070316.pdf.

  32. Walker, J. S., & Matarese, M. (2011). Using a theory of change to drive human resource development for wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 791–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Walker, J. S., & Schutte, M. S. (2005). Quality and individualization in wraparound team planning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-5052-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schultz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20(6), 707–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Health Care Foundation of Greater Kansas City.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Frauenholtz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the authors’ Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frauenholtz, S., Mendenhall, A.N. “They’ll Give You a Second Chance”: Perceptions of Youth and Caregivers Regarding Their Experiences in a Community-Based Mental Health System of Care. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 37, 477–485 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00654-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Youth and family voice
  • Children’s mental health
  • Systems of care
  • Evaluation