Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Response to Jean Mercer’s Article: Conventional and Unconventional Perspectives on Attachment and Attachment Problems: Comparisons and Implications. The Institute for Attachment and Child Development Model

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article is in response to Mercer’s (Child Adolesc Social Work J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0511-7, 2017) manuscript Conventional and Unconventional Perspectives on Attachment and Attachment Problems: Comparisons and Implications, 2006–2016. Mercer evaluated the progress, or lack thereof, in therapeutic practices concerning reactive attachment disorder (RAD) in response to the Report of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC) Task Force on Attachment Therapy, Reactive Attachment Disorder, and Attachment Problems (Chaffin et al., in Child Maltreatment 11:76–89, 2006). The authors of the present article concur that unconventional approaches to RAD were once practiced in the attachment field and that continued research is important to identify research-supported treatment. Fortunately, however, children with RAD and their families have already benefited from the practical knowledge and research gained with time and the advancements in intervention currently available to treat the effects of early trauma in children. The Institute for Attachment and Child Development inpatient model serves as one such example and will be outlined regarding theory, assessment, treatment and research in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, B., Uebel-von Sandersleben, H., Gevensleben, H., & Rothenberger, A. (2015). Pathophysiology of ADHD and associated problems-starting points for NF interventions? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M., & Coenen, A. (2009). Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: The effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Clinical EEG Neuroscience, 40, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940904000311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berubé, R., & Achenbach, T. (2010). Bibliography of published studies using the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.ASEBA.org.

  • Bremner, J. D. (2006). Traumatic stress: Effects on the brain. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 8, 445–461.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., Budzynski, H. K., Evans, J. R., & Abarbanel, A. (2009). Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback advanced theory and applications (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, M., Hanson, R., Saunders, B. E., Nichols, T., Barnett, D., Zeanah, C., & Miller-Perrin, C. (2006). Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems. Child Maltreatment, 11, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559505283699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Bellis, M. D., & Zisk, A. B. (2014). The biological effects of childhood trauma. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinics, 23, 185–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2014.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Viezel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory-III. In C. R. Reynolds, K. J. Vannest & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. F. (2009). Reactive attachment disorder treatment. In T. Budzynski, H. Budzynski, J. R. Evans & A. Abarbanel. (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback advanced theory and applications (2nd ed., pp. 315–335). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. F. (2014). Neurofeedback in the treatment of developmental trauma: Calming the fear-driven brain. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follan, M., & McNamara, M. (2014). A fragile bond: Adoptive parents’ experiences of caring for children with a diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23, 1076–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D. C. (2005). Neurofeedback treatment of depression and anxiety. Journal of Adult Development, 12, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-005-7029-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D. C., Bodenhamer-Davis, G., Gluck, G., Stokes, D., Harper, S. H., Trudeau, D., … Kirk, L. (2011). Standards of practice for neurofeedback and neurotherapy: A position paper of the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research. Journal of Neurotherapy, 15, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2010.545760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornor, G. (2008). Reactive attachment disorder. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 22, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2007.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludy-Dobson, C. R., & Perry, B. D. (2010). The role of healthy relational interactions in buffering the impact of childhood trauma. In E. Gil (Ed.), Working with Children to Heal Interpersonal Trauma: The Power of Play (pp. 26–43). New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (2017). Conventional and unconventional perspectives on attachment and attachment problems: Comparisons and implications, 2006–2016. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0511-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2011). Theories of life span development. In C. Campeanella, D. Musslewhite & A. Dodge (Eds.), Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical perspective for social work (pp. 201–259). Upper Saddle: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherlin, L., Arns, M., Lubar, J., & Sokhadze, E. (2010). A position paper on neurofeedback for the treatment of ADHD. Journal of Neurotherapy, 14, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10874201003773880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (G. Press. Ed.) (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, S. G., Ho, L. K., Urquiza, A. J., Zebell, N. M., Fernandez, Y. G. E., & Boys, D. (2011). The effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy with depressive mothers: The changing relationship as the agent of individual change. Child Psychiatry Human Development, 42, 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0226-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., IJzendoorn M. H., & Juffer, F. (2003). Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Kolk, B. A. (2005). Developmental trauma disorder: Toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories. Psychiatric Annals., 35, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20050501-06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Kolk, B. A., Hodgdon, H., Gapen, M., Musicaro, R., Suvak, M. K., Hamlin, E., & Spinazzola, J. (2016). A randomized controlled study of neurofeedback for chronic PTSD. PLoS ONE, 11, e0166752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166752.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, J. S., Vonk, M. E., & Reeves, P. M. (2010). Adoptive mothers’ perceptions of reactive attachment disorder therapy and its impact on family functioning. Clinical Social Work Journal, 38, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-009-0245-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Jolly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lien, F., Jolly, K. & Noonan, N. A Critical Response to Jean Mercer’s Article: Conventional and Unconventional Perspectives on Attachment and Attachment Problems: Comparisons and Implications. The Institute for Attachment and Child Development Model. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 36, 111–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-019-00597-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-019-00597-9

Keywords

Navigation