Advertisement

A Critical Response to Jean Mercer’s Article on Conventional and Unconventional Perspectives on Attachment and Attachment Problems

  • Varsha Pandya
Article

Abstract

This paper provides a critical response to Jean Mercer’s article published in the Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (2017,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0511-7), which reviewed articles published on attachment theory, practice, and research in past decade. Jean Mercer further classified information in two categories of conventional and unconventional. Primarily, the purpose of this paper is to contest this classification. This paper posits that conceptualization underlying both these categories can be linked to core tenets of attachment theory. It further identifies that attachment-related concerns occur on a continuum, and adequate guidance is not available to clinicians to diagnose it as such. At one end of the spectrum are attachment insecurities and at the other end disorders like reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder. Not acknowledging the spectrum of attachment problems can result in inadequate guidance to clinicians, leading to idiosyncratic diagnosis and treatment. The absence of validated diagnostic assessment methods has further exacerbated this issue. Limited research base for conventional or unconventional approaches has allowed the growth of treatment models with the potential to harm clients. Promoting new thinking, devising validated diagnostic methods, and strengthening evidence-base for treatments for attachment-related problems are the challenges facing the practitioners in the field of child and adolescent mental health, researchers in this field, and watch-guard organizations.

Keywords

Attachment problems Attachment disorders Childhood mental health Treatment of attachment problems 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5th (ed.)., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker-Weidman, A. (2006). Treatment for children with trauma-attachment disorders: Dyadic developmental psychotherapy. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 147–171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-0039-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28, 759–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ebesutani, C., Bernstein, A., Green, E. P., Hoagwood, K., Jensen, P. S., Kelleher, K., … Schoenwald, S. (2010). Concurrent validity of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales: Correspondence with DSM diagnosis and comparison to syndrome scales. Journal of Psychotherapy and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 373–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9174-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fox, N. A. (1985). Behavioral and autonomic antecedents of attachment in high risk infants. In T. Field & M. Reike (Eds.), Psychology of attachment and separation (pp. 389–414). Orlando, FL: Orlando Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossman, K. E., Grossman, K., & Waters, E. (Eds.). (2008). Attachment from infancy to adulthood: The major longitudinal studies. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hodges, K. (n.d.). CAFAS(R) overview of reliability and validity. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from http://www2.fasoutcomes.com.
  8. Hughes, D. (1997). Facilitating developmental attachment. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, D. (2004). An attachment-based treatment of maltreated children and young people. Attachment & Human Development, 6, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hughes, R. C., Rycus, J. S., Saunders-Adams, S. M., Hughes, L. K., & Hughes, K. N. (2013). Issues in differential response. Research on Social Work Practice, 23, 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., Clarke, C., Smiderman, N., & Garcia-Coll, C. (1984). Behavioral inhibition to the unfamiliar. Child Development, 55, 2212–2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mercer, J. (2017). Conventional and unconventional perspectives on attachment and attachment problems: Comparisons and implications, 2006–2016. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0511-7.Google Scholar
  13. Pandya, V. (2014). Children with reactive attachment disorder: Building hope for the future. Continuing Education Webinar, NASW-Wisconsin Chapter.Google Scholar
  14. Schwartz, E., & Davis, A. (2006). Reactive attachment disorder: Implications for school readiness and school functioning. Psychology in Schools, 44, 471–479.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lts.20161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Social Work Policy Institute. (n.d.). Evidence-based practice. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from http://www.socialworkpolicy.org.
  16. Thakkar, A., Mepukori, D., Henschel, K., & Tran, T. (2015). Understanding attachment patterns among orphans in residential care homes in New Delhi, India. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 14(3), 74–84.Google Scholar
  17. Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Vereijken, C. M. J. L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Rikson-Walra, V. (2004). Assessing attachment security with the Attachment Q sort: Meta-analytic evidence for the validity of the observer AQS. Child Development, 75, 1128–1213. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/online/AQS_meta-analysis.pdf.
  18. Wimmer, J. S., Vonk, M. E., & Bordnick, P. (2009). A preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of attachment therapy for adopted children with reactive attachment disorder. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 26, 351–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-009-179-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zeenah, C. H., & Smyke, A. T. (2008). Attachment disorders in family and social context. Infant Mental Health Journal, 29, 219–233.  https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.West OrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations