Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 273–277 | Cite as

The Prevalence of Uncorrected Refractive Errors in Adolescents Incarcerated in a Youth Detention Center

  • Roger P. Harrie
  • Paul Christopher Harrie


The purpose of this study was to determine the number of residents requiring corrective lenses in a youth detention center for juveniles from 12 to 18 years old over a 2-year period. A greater number of adolescents incarcerated for criminal activity in a detention center had uncorrected refractive errors (34.87 %) as compared to a comparable population in the public school system (22 %). The prevalence of significant refractive errors among incarcerated adolescents in this study is significantly higher than has been reported previously. The current study found a refractive error rate of almost 35 %. This difference can be explained by a number of factors in their social environments and identifies an area for potential intervention to reduce antisocial behavior in this population.


Refractive error Juvenile detention Vision screening At risk School failure 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No financial interests or conflicts of interest for corresponding author or co-authors.


  1. Christle, C. A., Jolivette, A., & Nelson, C. A. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 13, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ciner, E. B., & Schmidt, P. P. (1996). Vision screening of preschool children: Evaluating the past, looking toward the future. Optometry Vision Science, 75, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dandona, R., & Dandona, L. (2001). Refractive error blindness. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. Dotan, G., Truong, B., Snitzer, M., McCauley, C., Martinez-Helfman, S., Santa Maria, K., & Levin, A. V. (2015). Outcomes of an inner-city vision outreach program give kids sight day. Journal of the American Medical Association Ophthalmology, 133, 527–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Festinger, T., & Duckman, R. H. (2004). Vision status among foster children in NYC. Social Work in Health Care, 38, 77–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jobke, S., Kasten, E., & Vorwerk, C. (2008). The prevalence rates of refractive errors among children, adolescents, and adults in Germany. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2, 601–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, R., Nottingham, D., Stratton, R., & Zaba, J. N. (1996). The vision screening of academically and behaviorally at-risk pupils. Journal of Behavioral Optometry, 17, 1–5.Google Scholar
  8. Kleinstein, R. N., Jones, L. A., Hullett, S., Kwon, S., Lee, R. J., Friedman, N. E., … & Zadnik, K. (2003). Refractive error and ethnicity in children. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121, 1141–1147.Google Scholar
  9. Leonard, R. (2002). Statistics on vision impairment: A resource manual. Arelene R Gordon Research Institute of Lighthouse International. April.Google Scholar
  10. Naidoo, K. S., & Jaggernath, J. (2012). Uncorrected refractive errors. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 60, 432–437.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Powell, C., Wedner, S., & Hatt, S. R. (2006). Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2),. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005023.pub2.Google Scholar
  12. Roberts, J., & Slaby, D. (1974). Refraction status of youths 12-17 years. Vital Health Statistics, 148, 1–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rohul, A. M., Maqbool, A., Hussain, S. A., Shamila, H., Anjum, F., & Hamdani, Z. A. (2013). Prevalence of refractive errors in adolescents in outpatient attendees of the preventive ophthalmology clinic of community medicine, SKIMS, Kashmir, India. Nitte University Journal of Health Science, 3, 7–20.Google Scholar
  14. Villarreal, M. G., Ohlsson, J., Abrahamsson, M., & Sjostrom, A. (2000). Myopisation: the refractive tendency in teenagers. Prevalence of myopia among teenagers in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavia, 8, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vitale, S., Cotch, M. F., & Sperduto, R. D. (2006). Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 2158–2163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Williams, S., Wajda, B. N., Alvi, R., McCauley, C., Martinez-Helfman, S., & Levin, A. V. (2013). The challenges to ophthalmologic follow-up care in at-risk pediatric populations. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus., 17, 140–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wong, S. (1976). Vision analysis and refractive status of youths in a juvenile detention home population. Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 53, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zaba, J. N. (2001a). Children’s vision care in the 21st century and its impact on education, literacy, social issues, and the workplace: A call to action. Journal of Behavorial Optometry, 22, 39–40.Google Scholar
  19. Zaba, J. N. (2001b). Social, emotional, and educational consequences of undetected children’s vision problems. Journal of Behavioral Optometry, 12, 66–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.John Moran Eye CenterUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations