Advertisement

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 341–350 | Cite as

Parents Whose Children have Oppositional Defiant Disorder Talk to One Another on the Internet

  • Juanne N. Clarke
  • Gudrun Van Ameron
Article

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a qualitative frame and discourse analysis of an electronic support group or blog site where parents (usually mothers) discuss managing their children with either medically or mother diagnosed oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). This is a particularly important topic in an era of e-scaped medicine characterized by powerful circulating discourses around medicalization, children’s mental health issues, mother blame and intensive mothering. The findings document that the mothers adopt a medicalized understanding of ODD, on the one hand, in that they use the terminology, and borrow from, discourses regarding other mental and developmental issues such as depression and ADHD. For example, they focus on biological causation and brain chemistry as causative. On the other hand, their understanding of ODD does not reflect the symptoms necessary for a medical diagnosis. They support one another in this paradoxically medicalized conception of ODD through particular social support strategies in which they reinforce to one another that they are not to blame, that others don’t understand and that (with blog support) they are not alone. The implications of this for theories of medicalization, mother blame and intensive mothering are discussed. Some practical and clinical consequences are considered.

Keywords

Electronic support groups Mothering Intensive ODD Medicalization Oppositional defiance disorder Blog interaction Blogs 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council for funding for this project. This work was financially supported by the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, under Grant Number 410-2011-2099. The author had full control of all primary data and agrees to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

References

  1. Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004). Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother? Critical Discourse Studies, 1, 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altheide, D. (1996). Qualitative Research Methods (Vol. 38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, K. K. (2008). Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: The case of contested illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49, 20–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, M. H., & Georgiades, K. (2010). Perspectives on child psychiatric disorders in Canada. In J. Cairney & D. L. Steiner (Eds.), Mental disorder in Canada an epidemiological perspective (pp. 205–206). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bryman, A., & Teevan, J. (2005). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, J. D., Loeber, R., & Birmaher, B. (2002). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A review of the past 10 years, part II. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1275–1293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, G. L., & Walsh, J. A. (2002). The influence of ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms on the development of oppositional defiant disorder symptoms in a 2 year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology: An Official Publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 30, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Case, A., Paxson, C., & Vogl, T. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health in childhood: A comment on Chen, Martin and Matthews. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 757–761.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, J. N. (2013). Health, illness and medicine in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, J. N., & Gawley, A. (2009). The triumph of pharmaceuticals the portrayal of depression. 1980-2005. Administration and Policy in Mental Health Service Research, 36, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrad, P. (2005). The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 46, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cordell, A. (2004). Public health and children. Children and Society, 18, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durlak, J., & Wells, A. (1998). Evaluation of indicated preventive intervention (secondary prevention) mental health programs for children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 775–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328(1166), 1170.Google Scholar
  16. Fayard, A.-L., & De Sanctis, G. (2010). Enacting language games: The development of a sense of ‘we-ness’ in online forums. Information Systems, 20, 383–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox, S. & Fallows, D. (2003). Internet health resources Pew I Project Internet and American life. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org.
  18. Fox, S. & Rainie, L. (2002). Vital decisions: How internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2002/PIP_Vital_Deci sions_May2002.pdf.pdf.
  19. Furedi, F. (2008). Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts may be best for your child. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, H. (1984). Women, health and the family. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
  21. Gray, David. (2002). ‘Everybody just freezes. Everybody is just embarrassed’: Felt and enacted stigma among parents of children with high functioning autism. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22, 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grob, G. (1991). Origins of DSM-I: A study in appearance and reality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 421–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and People, 18, 142–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2003). The second shift. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  26. Horwitz, A. (2002). Creating mental illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, C., Chen, M. Y., & Ohan, J. L. (2006). Mothers’ attributions for behavior in nonproblem boys, boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional-defiant behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 60–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, D. D., & Swanson, D. H. (2007). Cognitive acrobatics in the construction of worker-mother identity. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 57, 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirk, S. A., & Kutchins, H. (1994). The myth of the reliability of DSM. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 15(1–2), 71–86. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/618609270?accountid=15090.
  30. Lavigne, J. V., Cicchetti, C., Gibbons, R. D., Binns, H. J., Larsen, L., & DeVito, C. (2001). Oppositional defiant disorder with onset in preschool years: Longitudinal stability and pathways to other disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1393–1400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, J. (2008). Changes in mothering of Korean women: Based on narrative interview data. Development and Society, 37, 141–167.Google Scholar
  32. Mayes, R., Bagwell, C., & Erkulwater, J. (2009). Medicating children ADHD and pediatric mental health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McKenna, B. (2004). Critical discourse studies: Where to from here? Critical Discourse Studies, 1, 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merikangas, K. R., He, J., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbididty Study-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 980–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nettleton, S., Burrows, R., O’Malley, L., & Watt, I. (2004). Health e-types? An analysis of the everyday use of the internet for health. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newsmax. (2004). New freedom initiative/mandatory mental health screening of American children passes. Retrieved September 20, 2011 from http://www.infowars.com/articles/brave_new_world/new_freedom_paul_amendment.htm.
  37. Nock, Matthew K., Kazdin, A. E., Hiripi, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 48, 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response biases. In J. P. Robinson, et al. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pingdom. (2011). Internet 2010 in numbers. Pingdom Website. Retrieved January 12, 2011 from http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/01/12/internet-2010-in-numbers.
  40. Richman, J., & Skidmore, D. (2000). Health implications of modern childhood. Journal of Child Health Care, 4, 106–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rowe, Richard, Costello, E. J., Angold, A., Copeland, W. E., & Maughan, B. (2010). Developmental pathways in oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 726–738.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt, J. (2007). Blogging practices: An analytical framework. Journal of Computer-Medicated Communication, 12, 1409–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silva, L., Goel, L., & Mousavidin, E. (2008). Exploring the dynamics of blog communities: The case of metafilter. Information Systems, 19, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh, I. (2002). Bad boys, good mothers and the ‘miracle’ of Ritalin. Science in Context, 15, 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh, I. (2004). Doing their jobs: Mothering with Ritalin in a culture of mother-blame. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1193–1205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh, I. (2006). A framework for understanding trends in ADHD diagnoses and stimulant drug treatment: Schools and schooling as a case study. Biosocieties, 1, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh, I. (2011). A disorder of anger and aggression: Children’s Perspectives on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the U.K. Social Science and Medicine, 73(889), 896.Google Scholar
  48. Steiner, H., & Remsing, L. (2007). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 126–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strand, M. (2011). Where do classifications come from? The DSM-III, the transformation of American psychiatry, and the problem of origins in the sociology of knowledge. Theory and Society, 40, 273–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thoits, P. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitmarsh, J. (2008). Mums, dummies and ‘dirty dids’: The dummy as a symbolic representation of mothering? Children and Society, 22, 278–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wikipedia Blog. Wikipedia Website. Retrieved April 14, 2012 from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog.
  53. Zargham, M. (2010). More than half of Americans use internet for health. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/02/03/us-internet_healthidUSTRE6120HM20100203.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations