Skip to main content
Log in

Important Risk Factors in Home-Removal Decisions: Social Caseworker Perceptions

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study identified factors that played a significant role in decisions to separate a child from his/her primary caretakers for 51 social service caseworkers. Participants rated and ranked the importance of 35 child risk/well-being factors used in recent child separation dispositions. Results indicated that boundary setting with a perpetrator of abuse and parental motivation played a significant role in decision-making. These preliminary findings suggest the need to prioritize services aimed at the promotion of the non-maltreating parent’s limit setting with the perpetrator of abuse, as well as caretaker motivation/cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980. P. L. 96–272, 94 Stat. 500

  • Arad B.D. (2001) The use of Shye’s Systematic Quality of Life Model in the examination of child protection officers’ decisions Social Indicators Research 56:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird C., Wagner D., Healy T., Johnson K. (1999) Risk assessment in child protective services: Consensus and actuarial model reliability Child Welfare 78:723–748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R.P. (1998). Theories guiding home-based intensive family preservation services. In J. Whitaker, J. Kinney, E. Tracy, & C. Booths (Eds.), Improving practice technology for work with high risk families: Lessons from the “Homebuilders” Social Work Education Project (Monograph No. 6, pp. 91–113). Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Social Welfare Research

  • Barth, R.P. (August, 2002). National survey of child and adolescent well-being (NSCAW): The USA’s first probability study of children investigated for abuse and neglect. Paper presented at the Victimization of Children and Youth International Research Conference. Portsmouth, New Hampshire

  • California Welfare and Institutions Code. Welfare and Institution Code 361.5. Retrieved July 18, 2002, from http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/index.html

  • Connell-Carrik K. (2003) A critical review of the empirical literature: Identifying correlates of child neglect Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 20:389–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePanfilis D., Zuravin S.J. (2001) Assessing risk to determine the need for services Child and Youth Review 23:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRoma, V.M., Lane, H., & Kessler, M.L. (2000). Family separation and reunification decision-making assessment. Unpublished manuscript

  • English D.J., Marshall D.B., Stewart A.J. (2003) Effects of family violence on child behavior and health during early childhood Journal of Family Violence 18:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Family Preservation and Family Support Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103–66, 13711–13716, 107 Stat. 312, 649–658

  • Family Resource Center’s Network. Resource for families and communities: Family development matrix. Retrieved March 8, 2000, from http://www.monterey.edu/academic/c...atrix/exmi/rfc_matrixrev022000.htm

  • Fraser M.W., Walton E., Lewis R.E., Pecora P.J., Walton W.K. (1996) An experiment in family reunification: Correlates of outcomes at one-year follow-up Children and Youth Services Review 18:335–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folsom W.S., Christensen M.L., Avery L., Moore C. (2003) The co-occurrence of child abuse and domestic violence: An issue of service delivery for social service professionals Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 20:375–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelles R.J. (1993). Family reunification/family preservation: Are children really being protected? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 8:577–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold N., Benbenishty R., Osmos R. (2001). A comparative study of risk assessments and recommended intervention in Canada and Israel Child Abuse and Neglect 25:607–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger L. K., Guse C., Boerger J., Minsky D., Pape D., Folsom C. (2004). Evaluation of a health care provider training program to identify and stop partner violence programs Journal of Family Violence 19:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard M.O., Jenson J.M. (1999) Clinical practice guidelines: Should social work develop them? Research on Social Work 9:283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J.F., Stevenson K.M., Leung P., Cheung K.M. (1995). Call to competence: Child protective services training and evaluation. Association for Protecting Children, Englewood, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, G.K. (August, 2002a). Panel overview presented at the Victimization of Children and Youth International Research Conference. Portsmouth: New Hampshire

  • Kantor, G.K. (August, 2002b). Parental substance abuse and child maltreatment: Evaluation results from the NH IV-E Waiver Project. Paper presented at the Victimization of Children and Youth International Research Conference. Portsmouth: New Hampshire

  • Kaufman, J. (August, 2002). Permanency planning for children: The Connecticut Model. Paper presented at the Victimization of Children and Youth International Research Conference. Portsmouth, New Hampshire

  • Levendosky A.A., Huth-Bocks A., Semel M.A. (2002) Adolescent peer relationships and mental health functioning in homes with domestic violence Journal of Clinical and child Adolescent Psychology 31:206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey D. (1994). Family preservations and child protection: Striking a balance Children and Youth Services Review 16:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio A., Pine B., Warsh R. (1994). Protecting children by preserving their families Children and Youth Services Review 16:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcconnaughy E.A., Prochaska J.O., Velicer W.F. (1983) Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles Psychotherapy, Research, and Practice 20:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills L.G. (2002) Training children’s service workers in domestic violence assessment and intervention: Research findings and implications for practice Children and Youth Services Review 24:561–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyan D.K., Gould C.L., Trost D.C., Loda F.A. (1982). Determinants of foster care placement for the maltreated child Child Abuse and Neglect 6:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services: Child maltreatment 2001: Summary of key findings. Retrieved on May 24, 2003, from http://www.calib.com/nccanch/pubs/factsheets/canstats.cfm

  • US Department of Health and Human Service. (2003). National study of child protective services: Systems and reform efforts. Retrieved on September 26, 2003, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/index.htm

  • Wolock I., Sherman P., Feldman L.H., Metzger B. (2001) Child abuse and neglect referral patterns: A longitudinal study Children and Youth Services Review 23:21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young B.C. (2000) The role of the children’s services bureau in family reunification Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 11:570–575

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Citadel Foundation, who provided a grant for this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Virginia M. DeRoma is affiliated with The Citadel, Psychology Department, Capers Hall, 171 Moultrie, 29409, Charleston, SC, USA. Maria Lynn Kessler is affiliated with Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR, USA. Ryan McDaniel is affiliated with New Hope for Children, Charleston, SC, USA. Cesar M. Soto is affiliated with Municipal Defense of Children and Adolescents, Chorrillos, Peru.

Address correspondence to Virginia M. DeRoma, The Citadel, Psychology Department, Capers Hall, 171 Moultrie, Charleston, SC, 29409.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeRoma, V.M., Kessler, M.L., McDaniel, R. et al. Important Risk Factors in Home-Removal Decisions: Social Caseworker Perceptions. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 23, 263–277 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-006-0047-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-006-0047-8

Keywords

Navigation