# On the Complexity of Calculating Sensitivity Parameters in Boolean Programming Problems

Article

First Online:

Received:

- 49 Downloads

## Abstract

This article shows that, for NP-hard problems, the calculation of even the stability ball of radius 1 for an optimal solution is computationally intensive (i.e., a suitable polynomial algorithm is absent when P ≠ NP). In using greedy algorithms for solving the set covering problem (knapsack problem) with the stability radius r = O(1) , there are polynomial algorithms for calculating the stability ball of radius r for an ln m-approximate solution (1-approximate solution).

## Keywords

complexity of sensitivity analysis stability radius of a problem stability ball of radius r for an ε-approximate problem solution## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.D. Fernandez-Baca and B. Venkatachalam, “Sensitivity analysis in combinatorial optimization,” in: T. Gonzalez (ed.), Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics, Chapman&Hall/CRC Computer and Information Science Series, Boca Raton (2007), pp. 30.-1–30.-29.Google Scholar
- 2.V. K. Leontiev and K. Kh. Mamutov, “Stability of solutions in problems of Boolean linear programming,” Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics,
**28**, No. 10, 1475–1481 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 3.Yu. N. Sotskov, “Stability analysis of an approximate solution of a Boolean problem of minimization of a linear form,” Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics,
**33**, No. 5, 785–795 (1993)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 4.N. Chakravarti and A. P. M. Wagelmans, “Calculation of stability radii for combinatorial optimization problems,” Operations Research Letters,
**23**, 1–7 (1998).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.I. V. Sergienko, Mathematical Models and Methods for Solving Discrete Optimization Problems [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (1985).Google Scholar
- 6.I. V. Sergienko and N. V. Filonenko, “Solution of some stability problems in integer linear programming,” Dop. AN URSR, Ser. A, No. 6, 79–82 (1982).Google Scholar
- 7.S. Van Hoesel and A. Wagelmans, “On the complexity of postoptimality analysis of 0/1 programs,” Discrete Applied Mathematics,
**91**, 251–263 (1999).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.C. Blair, “Sensitivity analysis for knapsack problems: A negative result,” Discrete Applied Mathematics,
**81**, 133–139 (1998).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.G. J. Woeginger, “Sensitivity analysis for knapsack problems: Another negative result,” Discrete Applied Mathematics,
**92**, 247–251 (1999).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.V. A. Mikhailyuk, “General approach to estimating the complexity of postoptimality analysis for discrete optimization problems,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis,
**46**, No. 2, 290–295 (2010)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.V. A. Mikhailyuk and N. V. Lishchuk, “Sensitivity analysis of the knapsack problem: A negative result,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis,
**49**, No. 2, 201–204 (2013)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.V. A. Mikhailyuk, “Reoptimization of max
*k*-cover: Approximation ratio threshold,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis,**48**, No. 2, 242–248 (2012)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.V. A. Chvatal, “A greedy heuristic for the set covering problem,” Mathematics of Operation Research,
**4**, No. 3, 233–235 (1979)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.N. N. Kuzyurin and S. A. Fomin, Efficient Algorithms and Complexity of Computations [in Russian], Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow (2008).Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015