Advertisement

Cybernetics and Systems Analysis

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 99–107 | Cite as

A system of entities for enterprise business models

  • P. P. Masliankoa
  • A. S. Maistrenkoa
Article
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

A business model of a modern enterprise is a base element for the most adequate and reasonable reaction to a change in the enterprise’s socio-economic environment. To achieve desired results, this reaction should take into account enterprise features. The use of metamodeling and systems theory allows one to create an integrated system of business models. Such models are based on enterprise features and are implemented using a common set of entities for all business models.

Keywords

business model enterprise metamodeling system systems engineering. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Zott, R. Amit, and L. Massa, The Business Model: Theoretical Roots, Recent Developments, and Future Research, Working Paper WP-862 IESE Business School, University of Navarra (2010).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. A. Zachman, “A framework for information systems architecture,” IBM Systems Journ., 26, No. 3, 276–292 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    U. Frank, “Multi-perspective business modeling (MEMO) — conceptual framework and modeling languages,” in: 35th Annual Hawaii Intern. Conf. on System Sci. (HICSS’02), 3 (2002), pp. 72–82.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Karagiannis and H. Kühn, “Metamodeling platforms,” in: Proc. 3rd Intern. Conf. EC-Web 2002, LNCS 2455, 182–197 (2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Kühn, F. Bayer, S. Jungunger, and D. Karagiannis, “Enterprise model integration,” in: Proc. 4th Intern. Conf. EC-Web 2003, LNCS 2738, 379–392 (2003).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Penker and H.-E. Ericsson, Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work, Wiley, New York (2000).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Vernadat, “UEML: Towards a unified business modeling language,” in: Actes 3eme Conference Francophone de Modelisation et Simulation MOSIM’01 (2001) (2001), pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Dietz, Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Z. Zgurovsky and N. D. Pankratova, Systems Analysis: Problems, Methodology, and Applications [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. V. Blauberg and E. G. Yudin, Formation and Essence of the System Approach [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. P. Maslianko and O. S. Maistrenko, “Business-engineering of enterprise systems,” Naukovi Visti NTUU “KPI,” No. 1, 69–78 (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. P. Maslianko, “Fundamentals of the methodology of system design of information and communication systems,” Naukovi Visti NTUU “KPI,” No. 6, 54–60 (2007).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. van Gig, Applied General Systems Theory [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. H. Rhodes, A. M. Ross, and D. J. Nightingale, “Architecting the system of systems enterprise: Enabling constructs and methods from the field of engineering systems,” in: 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conf. (2009), pp. 190–195.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Olive, Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg (2007).MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Kleppe, J. Warmer, and W. Bast, MDA Explained: The Practice and Promises of the Model Driven Architecture, Addison Wesley, Boston (2003).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. A. Raizberg, L. S. Lozovskii, and E. B. Starodubtseva, Modern Dictionary of Economics [in Russian], INFRA-M, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Seidewitz, “What models mean,” IEEE Software, 20, No. 5, 26–32 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Kühne, “Matters of (meta-)modeling,” J. on Software and Systems Model., 5, No. 4, 369–385 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Hesse, “More matters on (meta-)modeling: Remarks on Thomas Kühne’s ‘matters’,” J. on Software and Systems Model., 5, No. 4, 387–39 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Atkinson and T. Kühne, “Model-driven development: A metamodeling foundation,” IEEE Software, 20, No. 5, 36–41 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Booch, I. Jacobson, and J. Rumbaugh, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading, MA (2005).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core, OMG (2006).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Bézivin and O. Grebé, “Towards a precise definition of the OMG/MDA framework,” in: Proc. 16th Annual Intern. Conf. on Automat. Software Engineer. (2001), pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Order No. 1–30 of March 10, 2005, “On the further improvement of the university activity and its management system,” Collection of Normative Acts, Vyd-vo “Politekhnika” NTUU “KPI” (2005).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Technical University of Ukraine “Kiev Polytechnic Institute”KyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations