Cybernetics and Systems Analysis

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 860–864 | Cite as

Comparative analysis of topological constructions of Sparse Flat Neighborhood Networks for cluster supercomputers

  • A. A. Koshul’ko


The topology of Sparse Flat Neighborhood Networks (SFNNs) is considered and its advantages and drawbacks are analyzed. A comparative analysis of the quality of SFNN constructions designed by a modified cyclic method is performed. A set of quality criteria for estimation of practical usefulness of SFNN constructions is proposed.


single-level network sparse single-level network computing cluster 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O. Koshul’ko and A. Koshul’ko, “High-performance computing clusters,” Electronic Components and Systems, No. 6, 39–41 (2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. P. Mar’yanovich and O. A. Koshul’ko, “Use of the topology of Flat Neighborhood Networks for construction of cluster supercomputers,” Mat. Mashiny i Systemy, No. 4, 3–12 (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. G. Dietz and T. I. Mattox, “KLAT2’s Flat Neighborhood,” in: Proc. 4th Annual Linux Showcase and Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. (2000), Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. M. Gordon, G. Kuperberg, and O. Patashnik, “New constructions for covering designs,” J. of Combinatorial Designs, No. 3, 269–284 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Koshul’ko
    • 1
  1. 1.Cybernetics InstituteNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations