Skip to main content
Log in

Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE Trial

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous studies suggest that the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized not only by high ventricular stiffness, but also by vascular stiffness. Azilsartan has higher vascular affinity compared with other angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which were proven to have no beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF in earlier clinical trials. We aimed to test the hypothesis that azilsartan may improve left ventricular diastolic function in HFpEF patients with hypertension in this trial.

Methods

The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Diastolic Function in Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and assessor(s)-blinded, active controlled using candesartan, parallel-group clinical trial, to compare changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction between HFpEF patients with hypertension who have received candesartan or azilsartan for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in early diastolic wave height/early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e’) assessed by echocardiography from the baseline to the end of the study (48 weeks). A total of 190 patients will be recruited into the study.

Conclusions

The design of the J-TASTE trial will provide data on whether differences between the effects of the two tested drugs on LV diastolic function exist in HFpEF patients with hypertension and will improve understanding of the pathophysiological role of vascular stiffness on diastolic function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fonarow GC, Stough WG, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg BH, et al. Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:768–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuchihashi-Makaya M, Hamaguchi S, Kinugawa S, Yokota T, Goto D, Yokoshiki H, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with heart failure and reduced vs preserved ejection fraction. Report from the Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD). Circ J. 2009;73:1893–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, et al. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the charm-overall programme. Lancet. 2003;362:759–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the charm-preserved trial. Lancet. 2003;362:777–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Massie BM, Carson PE, McMurray JJ, Komajda M, McKelvie R, Zile MR, et al. Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2456–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anand IS, Rector TS, Cleland JG, Kuskowski M, McKelvie RS, Persson H, et al. Prognostic value of baseline plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interactions with irbesartan treatment effects in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the I-Preserve Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4:569–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borlaug BA, Paulus WJ. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:670–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takai S, Jin D, Sakonjo H, Takubo T, Nakanishi T. Significance of the vascular concentration of angiotensin ii-receptor blockers on the mechanism of lowering blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Pharmacol Sci. 2013;123:371–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakamoto M, Asakura M, Nakano A, Kanzaki H, Sugano Y, Amaki M, et al. Azilsartan, but not candesartan improves left ventricular diastolic function in patients with hypertension and heart failure. Int J Gerontol. 2015;9:201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shimamoto K, Ando K, Fujita T, Hasebe N, Higaki J, Horiuchi M, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens Res. 2014;37:253–390.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29:277–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC Jr, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Rodeheffer RJ. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA. 2003;289:194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Imazu M, Takahama H, Asanuma H, Funada A, Sugano Y, Ohara T, et al. Pathophysiological impact of serum fibroblast growth factor 23 in patients with nonischemic cardiac disease and early chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014;307:H1504–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawaguchi M, Hay I, Fetics B, Kass DA. Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: implications for systolic and diastolic reserve limitations. Circulation. 2003;107:714–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam CS, Roger VL, Rodeheffer RJ, Bursi F, Borlaug BA, Ommen SR, et al. Cardiac structure and ventricular-vascular function in persons with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from Olmsted County, Minnesota. Circulation. 2007;115:1982–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Borlaug BA, Lam CS, Roger VL, Rodeheffer RJ, Redfield MM. Contractility and ventricular systolic stiffening in hypertensive heart disease insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:410–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Elzinga G, Westerhof N. Pressure and flow generated by the left ventricle against different impedances. Circ Res. 1973;32:178–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hori M, Inoue M, Kitakaze M, Tsujioka K, Ishida Y, Fukunami M, et al. Ejection timing as a major determinant of left ventricular relaxation rate in isolated perfused canine heart. Circ Res. 1984;55:31–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Redfield MM, Kessler K, Chang HJ, Abraham TP, et al. Impact of arterial load and loading sequence on left ventricular tissue velocities in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1570–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alderman EL, Glantz SA. Acute hemodynamic interventions shift the diastolic pressure-volume curve in man. Circulation. 1976;54:662–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brodie BR, Grossman W, Mann T, McLaurin LP. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations. J Clin Invest. 1977;59:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Perez Del Villar C, Savvatis K, Lopez B, Kasner M, Martinez-Legazpi P, Yotti R, et al. Impact of acute hypertension transients on diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113:906–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartzenberg S, Redfield MM, From AM, Sorajja P, Nishimura RA, Borlaug BA. Effects of vasodilation in heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction implications of distinct pathophysiologies on response to therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:442–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohn JN, Tognoni G. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1667–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Okura H, Kubo T, Asawa K, Toda I, Yoshiyama M, Yoshikawa J, et al. Elevated e/e’ predicts prognosis in congestive heart failure patients with preserved systolic function. Circ J. 2009;73:86–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akiyama E, Sugiyama S, Matsuzawa Y, Konishi M, Suzuki H, Nozaki T, et al. Incremental prognostic significance of peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1778–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Miller FA, Oh JK, Redfield MM, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102:1788–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mullens W, Borowski AG, Curtin RJ, Thomas JD, Tang WH. Tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of intracardiac filling pressure in decompensated patients with advanced systolic heart failure. Circulation. 2009;119:62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitter SS, Shah SJ, Thomas JD. A test in context: E/a and e/e’ to assess diastolic dysfunction and lv filling pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1451–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, et al. 2016 esc guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the european society of cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the esc. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mantovani A, Garlanda C, Bottazzi B, Peri G, Doni A, Martinez de la Torre Y, et al. The long pentraxin ptx3 in vascular pathology. Vasc Pharmacol. 2006;45:326–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Latini R, Maggioni AP, Peri G, Gonzini L, Lucci D, Mocarelli P, et al. Prognostic significance of the long pentraxin ptx3 in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;110:2349–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Matsubara J, Sugiyama S, Nozaki T, Sugamura K, Konishi M, Ohba K, et al. Pentraxin 3 is a new inflammatory marker correlated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with normal ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:861–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wolf M. Forging forward with 10 burning questions on fgf23 in kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:1427–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kestenbaum B, Sampson JN, Rudser KD, Patterson DJ, Seliger SL, Young B, et al. Serum phosphate levels and mortality risk among people with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:520–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Plischke M, Neuhold S, Adlbrecht C, Bielesz B, Shayganfar S, Bieglmayer C, et al. Inorganic phosphate and fgf-23 predict outcome in stable systolic heart failure. Eur J Clin Investig. 2012;42:649–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masafumi Kitakaze.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

H.T. reports grants from The Bayer Scholarship for Cardiovascular Research; grants from Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; personal fees from Otsuka; personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co.; and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo. M. K. reports grants and personal fees from Takeda, during the conduct of the study, and grants from Japanese government; grants from Japan Heart Foundation; grants from Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation; grants and personal fees from Asteras; grants and personal fees from Sanofi; personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo; grants and personal fees from Pfizer; grants and personal fees from Ono; personal fees from Bayer; grants and personal fees from Novartis; personal fees from Behringer; grants and personal fees from Tanabe Mitsubishi; personal fees from Kowa; grants and personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin; personal fees from Dainippon Sumitomo; personal fees from Sawai; personal fees from MSD; grants and personal fees from Abbott; grants and personal fees from Otsuka; grants from Calpis; grants from Nihon Kohden; personal fees from Shionogi; personal fees from AstraZeneca; personal fees from Asahi Kasei Med.; personal fees from Novo Nordisk; personal fees from Fujifilm RI; and personal fees from Japan Medical Data. Dr. Asakura reports grants from Actelion Pharmaceutical Japan; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc.; personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; personal fees from Sanofi K.K.; personal fees from Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; personal fees from MSD K.K.; personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., LTD.; personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo; personal fees from Pfizer Japan Inc.; and personal fees from Astellas Amgen Biopharma, outside the submitted work. Dr. Abe reports grants from Teijin, grants from Abbott, grants from Shionogi, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants from Ono, grants from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, personal fees from Toa Eiyo, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Dainippon Sumitomo, personal fees from Otsuka, personal fees from Philips, personal fees from GE, personal fees from Siemens, and grants from Japanese government, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ajioka has nothing to disclose. Dr. Aonuma has nothing to disclose. Dr. Anzai has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hayashi has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hiramitsu reports personal fees from null, during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Tanabe Mitsubishi; personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo; personal fees from Bayer; personal fees from Takeda; personal fees from Asteras; personal fees from MSD; and personal fees from Kowa, from null, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kawai has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kioka has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kimura has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lim has nothing to disclose. Dr. Matsuoka has nothing to disclose. Dr. Motoki has nothing to disclose. Dr. Nagata has nothing to disclose. Dr. Nakamura has nothing to disclose. Dr. Ohte has nothing to disclose. Dr. Ozaki has nothing to disclose. Dr. Sasaoka has nothing to disclose. Dr. Tamaki reports non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, non-financial support from Eli Lilly and Company, non-financial support from Otsuka Pharmaceutical, non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from Toa Eiyo, non-financial support from Nihon Medi-Physics, non-financial support from Medtronic, and non-financial support from Nikkei Business Publications, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hamasaki has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kitakaze reports grants from Japanese government, during the conduct of the study, and grants from Japanese government; grants from Japan Heart Foundation; grants from Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation; grants and personal fees from Asteras; personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo; grants and personal fees from Pfizer; grants and personal fees from Ono; personal fees from Bayer; grants from Novartis; grants and personal fees from Tanabe Mitsubishi; personal fees from Kowa; personal fees from MSD; grants from Nihon Kohden; personal fees from Shionogi; personal fees from Astrazeneca; grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca; personal fees from Taisho Toyama; personal fees from Toyama Kagaku; grants and personal fees from Kureha; and personal fees from Toa Eiyo, outside the submitted work.

Disclaimer

Persons from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited will not be involved in conducting this study and analysis, and intentions of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited will not be reflected in the results and interpretations of this study.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takahama, H., Asakura, M., Abe, Y. et al. Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE Trial. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 32, 381–388 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6799-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6799-5

Keywords

Navigation