Amiodarone Compared with Lidocaine for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation on Hospital Arrival: a Nationwide Database Study
- 438 Downloads
The latest resuscitation guidelines recommend the use of amiodarone in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) to improve the rates of return of spontaneous circulation. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that amiodarone is superior to lidocaine with respect to survival at discharge. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the hypothesis that amiodarone is superior to lidocaine with regard to the rate of survival to hospital discharge for OHCA patients with VF/pulseless VT (pVT) on hospital arrival.
Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we identified 3951 patients from 795 hospitals who experienced cardiogenic OHCA and had refractory ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival between July 2007 and March 2013. The patients were categorized into amiodarone (n = 1743) and lidocaine (n = 2208) groups, from which 801 propensity score-matched pairs were generated.
There was no significant difference in the rate of survival to hospital discharge between the amiodarone and lidocaine groups (15.2 % vs. 17.1 %; difference, −1.9 %; 95 % CI, −5.5 to 1.7) in propensity score-matched analyses. Cox regression analyses did not indicate significant in-hospital mortality differences between the amiodarone and lidocaine groups for the propensity score-matched groups (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.94 to 1.17).
The present nationwide study suggested that there was no significant difference in the rate of survival to hospital discharge between cardiogenic OHCA patients with persistent ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival treated with amiodarone or lidocaine.
KeywordsAmiodarone Antiarrhythmic Cardiac arrhythmias CPR
This work was supported by Grants for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (Grant Numbers: H27-Policy-Designated-009 to Prof. Fushimi and Prof. Yasunaga; H27-Policy-Strategy-011 to Prof. Yasunaga) and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Japan (Grant Number: KAKENHI-15H05685 to Dr. Tagami). The funders had no role in the execution of this study or the interpretation of the results.
- 12.Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European resuscitation council, Australian resuscitation council, New Zealand resuscitation council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, resuscitation councils of southern Africa. Circulation. 2004;110:3385–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the utstein resuscitation registry templates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (american heart association, european resuscitation council, australian and new zealand council on resuscitation, heart and stroke foundation of canada, interamerican heart foundation, resuscitation council of southern africa, resuscitation council of asia); and the american heart association emergency cardiovascular care committee and the council on cardiopulmonary, critical care, perioperative and resuscitation. Circulation. 2015;132:1286–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 6: advanced cardiovascular life support: section 5: pharmacology i: agents for arrhythmias. The american heart association in collaboration with the international liaison committee on resuscitation. Circulation. 2000; 102:I112–28.Google Scholar