A Clinical Puzzle: Fibrates and Homocysteine Elevation

Editorial to: “Fibrates may cause an abnormal urinary betaine loss which is associated with elevations in plasma homocysteine” by M. Lever et al.
  • Michael H. Davidson

Key words

Fibrates Urinary betaine Homocysteine Hyperlipidemia Metabolic syndrome Cardiovascular risk PPAR-alpha FIELD study 

Fibrates (gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, and fenofibrate) are commonly used drugs to treat patients with dyslipidemia, especially those with hypertriglyceridemia. A well-known effect of fibrate therapy is a significant increase in homcysteine levels which range from approximately 25% for gemfibrozil to up to 50% with fenofibrate or bezafibrate [1]. Severe elevation of homocysteine levels is associated with vascular and venous thrombosis and premature cardiovascular disease. A mild to moderate increase in homocyteine levels (> 15 mg/dl) is also a risk marker for coronary heart disease [2] but numerous clinical trials to reduce homocysteine by folic acid supplementation have not shown a clinical benefit [3]. Therefore, the clinical relevance of the homocysteine increase with fibrate therapy has been uncertain. Recent clinical trial evidence has raised concerns that this effect may potentially offset some of the beneficial lipoprotein changes and negate much of the cardiovascular benefits of fibrate treatment [4]. In the FIELD trial, fenofibrate therapy did not achieve a significant benefit over placebo in the primary endpoint (fatal and non-fatal MI) but did reduce total cardiovascular events (-11% p < .05) [5]. However, there was an increase in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with fenofibrate treatment that was postulated to potentially be due to the 50% increase in homocysteine [5]. In the FIELD trial there was an inverse correlation between baseline homocysteine levels and HDL-C or ApoA1 in the placebo and fenofibrate groups [6]. The greater the increase in homocysteine induced by fenofibrate, the smaller the increases in HDL-C and ApoA1 (p < .0001 for linear trends). On the other hand, there was highly significant and positive relationship between fenofibrate-induced changes in homocsyteine and ApoAII levels. Presently, although the fibrate-induced increase in homcysteine is worrisome, there are no recommendations to measure homocysteine or modify dose of treatment with fibrates due to this side effect.

Lever and colleagues, in this issue, report that betaine excretion is increased with bezafibrate therapy [7]. Betaine is a major osmolyte responsible for cell volume regulation but also is a source of methyl groups for the regeneration of S-adendosylmethionine, thereby sparing the consumption of homocysteine. In a relatively small patient cohort in a lipid clinic (n = 32), Lever and colleagues found that abnormal betaine excretion is common in patients on bezafibrate therapy. Although this study is too small to make definitive conclusions, it suggests an important hypothesis that may improve fibrate therapy or assist in the development of novel PPAR-alpha agents that do not increase homocysteine levels.

Over the past few years, several investigators have advocated folic acid, B12, and B6 supplementation with fibrate therapy to obviate the induced increase in homocystiene. In a double-blind cross over study, 650 mcg of folic acid, 50 mcg of vitamin B12, and 5 mg of B6 abolished the 44% increase in homocysteine with fenofibrate treatment [8]. In another small clinical trial, folic acid alone ameliorated the rise in homocysteine with 200 mg/day of micronized fenofibrate [9].

Betaine supplementation has also been shown to reduce plasma homocystiene and reduce the increase in homocysteiene after methionine loading by 50% [10]. The combination of betaine and folic acid together may provide substantial decreases in homocysteine levels. Betaine also attenuates atherosclerosis in ApoE knockout mice [11]. Therefore, based on the findings of Lever and colleagues, there is an intriguing recommendation to consider betaine supplementation for patients on fibrate treatment. Perhaps a combination of folic acid and betaine would provide enhanced benefits for patients on fibrate therapy.

Metabolic syndrome is associated with higher homocysteine levels, and fibrates are frequently utilized to affect the mixed dyslipidemia in this growing patient population [12]. The concerns raised by the FIELD trial have spotlighted the adverse effect of fibrates on homocysteine metabolism. If betaine or a combination of betaine and folic acid can modify this adverse effect, then this will potentially lead to improved patient outcomes. The upcoming ACCORD trial results that evaluated the effects of fenofibrate in combination with a stain vs statin alone will provide valuable insights into the benefits of fibrate-statin combination on CVD outcomes in patients with high-risk diabetes. If this study demonstrates no significant CVD protection with fenofibrate, then fenofibrate will potentially require another clinical evaluation in combination with betaine supplementation, especially if a subgroup of patients with higher homocysteine levels have lower HDL-C levels.


  1. 1.
    Luc G, Jacob N, Bouly M, Fruchart JC, Staels B, Giral P. Fenofibrate increases homocystinemia through a PPARalpha-mediated mechanism. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004;43:452–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moat SJ. Plasma total homocysteine: instigator or indicator of cardiovascular disease? Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:345–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bazzano LA. Folic acid supplementation and cardiovascular disease: the state of the art. Am J Med Sci. 2009;338:48–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidson MH, Armani A, McKenney JM, Jacobson TA. Safety considerations with fibrate therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:3C–18C.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, Best J, Scott R, Taskinen MR, et al. FIELD study investigators. Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 26;366(9500):1849–61. Erratum in: Lancet 2006;368(9545):1415. Lancet 2006;368(9545):1420.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taskinen MR, Sullivan DR, Ehnholm C, Whiting M, Zannino D, Simes RJ, et al. FIELD study investigators. Relationships of HDL cholesterol, ApoA-I, and ApoA-II with homocysteine and creatinine in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with fenofibrate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:950–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lever M, George PM, Slow S, Elmslie JL, Scott RS, Richards AM, et al. Fibrates may cause an abnormal urinary betaine loss which is associated with elevations in plasma homocysteine. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. (2009). [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dierkes J, Westphal S, Luley C. The effect of fibrates and other lipid-lowering drugs on plasma homocysteine levels. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004;3:101–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stulc T, Melenovský V, Grauová B, Kozich V, Ceska R. Folate supplementation prevents plasma homocysteine increase after fenofibrate therapy. Nutrition. 2001;17:721–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkinson W, Elmslie J, Lever M, Chambers ST, George PM. Dietary and supplementary betaine: acute effects on plasma betaine and homocysteine concentrations under standard and postmethionine load conditions in healthy male subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:577–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olthof MR, Verhoef P. Effects of betaine intake on plasma homocysteine concentrations and consequences for health. Curr Drug Metab. 2005;6:15–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lv S, Fan R, Du Y, Hou M, Tang Z, Ling W, et al. Betaine supplementation attenuates atherosclerotic lesion in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Eur J Nutr. 2009;48:205–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineRadiant ResearchChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations