Advertisement

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 331–338 | Cite as

The Gender Differences in the Relaxation to Levosimendan of Human Internal Mammary Artery

  • Fatma Akar
  • Yasemin Manavbasi
  • Ali Ihsan Parlar
  • Ahmet Tulga Ulus
  • Salih Fehmi Katircioglu
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The mechanism of the vasorelaxation to levosimendan varies depending on the vascular bed and species studied. Here, we examined the vasorelaxation to levosimendan as well as its modification by various potassium channel antagonists in human internal mammary artery (IMA) obtained from male and female patients.

Methods

IMA grafts were supplied from 27 male and 19 age-matched female patients undergoing coronary bypass operation. The contraction to noradrenaline and relaxation to levosimendan were studied in IMA rings obtained from both gender. The relaxations to levosimendan were also assessed in the presence of glibenclamide (10 μM), an adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) blocker, or charybdotoxin (100 nM), a calcium-activated potassium channel (KCa) blocker, or 4-aminopyridine(1 mM), a voltage-sensitive potassium channel (Kv) inhibitor.

Results

Concentration–response curves to noradrenaline were not different in IMA rings from either gender. Pretreatment with levosimendan (3 × 10−7 M) slightly modified the contractions to noradrenaline in both gender. Levosimendan (10−9–10−5 M) produced concentration-dependent relaxation in IMA rings, contracted by noradrenaline (5 × 10−6 M), from males and females. The vasodilatory effects of levosimendan were more pronounced in the arteries from males (83%) than females (69%), in term of the maximal relaxation (E max). Charybdotoxin and glibenclamide significantly inhibited the relaxation to levosimendan in the arteries from males but not in those of females.

Conclusions

The vasodilating efficacy of levosimendan and its relaxation mechanism differs between the arteries from males and females, which may have clinical consequences in the treatment of heart failure.

Key words

levosimendan gender human artery potassium channels relaxation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper is supported by the Gazi University Research Fund (BAP 02/2006-10).

References

  1. 1.
    Vegh A, Papp JG, Udvary E, Kaszala K. Hemodynamic effects of calcium-sensitizing agents. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26:20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harkin CP, Pagel PS, Tessmer JP, Warltier DC. Systemic and coronary hemodynamic actions and left ventricular functional effects of levosimendan in conscious dogs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26:179–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Follath F, Cleland JGF, Just H, Papp JG, Scholz H, Peuhkurinen K, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2002;360:196–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michaels AD, McKeown B, Kostal M, Vakharia KT, Jordan MV, Gerber IL et al. Effects of intravenous levosimendan on human coronary vasomotor regulation, left ventricular wall stress, and myocardial oxygen uptake. Circulation 2005;111:1504–09.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pataricza J, Hohn J, Petri A, Balogh A, Papp JG. Comparison of the vasorelaxant effect of cromakalim and the new inodilator, levosimendan, in human isolated portal vein. J Pharm Pharmacol 2000;52:213–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hohn J, Pataricza J, Petri A, Tóth GK, Balogh A, Varró A, et al. Levosimendan interacts with potassium channel blockers in human saphenous veins. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2004;94:271–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yokoshiki H, Katsube Y, Sunagawa M, Sperelakis N. Levosimendan, a novel Ca2+ sensitizer, activates the glibenclamide- sensitive K+ channel in rat arterial myocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 1997;333:249–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Witt BJ, Ibrahim IN, Bayer E, Fields AM, Richards TA, Banister RE, et al. An analysis of responses to levosimendan in the pulmonary vascular bed of the cat. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1427–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pataricza J, Krassoi I, Hohn J, Kun A, Papp JG. Functional role of potassium channels in the vasodilating mechanism of levosimendan in porcine isolated coronary artery. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2003;17:115–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orshal JM, Khalil RA. Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004;286:R233–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kahonen M, Tolvanen JP, Sallinen K, Wu X, Porsti I. Influence of gender on control of arterial tone in experimental hypertension. Am J Physiol 1998;275:H15–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kauser K, Rubanyi GM. Gender difference in endothelial dysfunction in the aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1995;25:517–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kneale BJ, Chowienczyk PJ, Brett SE, Coltart DJ, Ritter JM. Gender differences in sensitivity to adrenergic agonists of forearm resistance vasculature. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1233–1238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinna C, Cignarella A, Zanardo R, Bolego C, Puglisi L. Gender differences and antioxidant treatment affect aortic reactivity in short-term diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2001;431:71–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edwards FH, Carey JS, Grover FL, Bero JW, Hartz RS. Impact of gender on coronary bypass operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:125–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zitser-Gurevich Y, Simchen E, Galai N, Mandel M; ISCAB Consortium. Effect of perioperative complications on excess mortality among women after coronary bypass: the Israeli Coronary Artery Bypass Graft study (ISCAB). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:517–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hammar N, Sandberg E, Larsen FF, Ivert T. Comparison of early and late mortality in men and women after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Stockholm, Sweden, 1980 to 1989. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:659–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edwards FH, Ferraris VA, Shahian DM, Peterson E, Furnary AP, Haan CK, et al. Gender-specific practice guidelines for coronary artery bypass surgery: perioperative management. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:2189–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akar F, Uydes-Dogan BS, Tufan H, Aslamaci S, Koksoy C, Kanzik I. The comparison of the responsiveness of human isolated internal mammary and gastroepiploic arteries to levcromakalim: an alternative approach to the management of graft spasm. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;44:49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nelson MT, Quayle JM. Physiological roles and properties of potassium channels in arterial smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 1995;268:C799–822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Velez DA, Morris CD, Muraki S, Budde JM, Otto RN, Zhao Z-Q, et al. Brief pretreatment of radial artery conduits with phenoxybenzamine prevents vasoconstriction long term. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1977–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sandell EP, Hayha M, Antila S, Heikkinen P, Ottoila P, Lehtonen LA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan in healthy volunteers and patients with congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26:S57–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lilleberg J, Nieminen MS, Akkila J, Heikkiläc L, Kuitunend A, Lehtonen L, et al. Effects of a new calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, on haemodynamics, coronary blood flow and myocardial substrate utilization early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J 1998;19:660–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uydes-Dogan BS, Nebigil M, Aslamaci S, Onur E, Kanzik I, Akar F. The comparison of vascular reactivities of arterial and venous grafts to vasodilators: management of graft spasm. Int J Cardiol 1996;53:137–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowman P, Haikala H, Paul RJ. Levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer in cardiac muscle, induces relaxation in coronary smooth muscle through calcium desensitization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;288:316–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quast U. Do the K+ channel openers relax smooth muscle by opening K+ channels? Trends Pharmacol Sci 1993;14:332–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krassoi I, Pataricza J, Kun A, Papp JG. Calcium-dependent vasorelaxant capacity of levosimendan in porcine and human epicardial coronary artery preparations. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2000;14:691–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yildiz O, Seyrek M, Yildirim V, Demirkilic U, Nacitarhan C. Potassium channel-related relaxation by levosimendan in the human internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1715–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Usta C, Eksert B, Golbasi I, Bigat Z, Ozdem SS. The role of potassium channels in the vasodilatory effect of levosimendan in human internal thoracic arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:329–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dignan RJ, Yeh Jr. T, Dyke CM, Lutz HA 3rd, Wechsler AS. The influence of age and sex on human internal mammary artery size and reactivity. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:792–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stallone JN, Crofton JT, Share L. Sexual dimorphism in vasopressin-induced contraction of rat aorta. Am J Physiol 1991;260:H453–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crews JK, Khalil RA. Gender-specific inhibition of Ca2+ entry mechanisms of arterial vasoconstriction by sex hormones. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1999;26:707–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Murphy JG, Khalil RA. Gender-specific reduction in contractility and [Ca2+]i in vascular smooth muscle cells of female rat. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2000;278:C834–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Teede H, van der Zypp A, Majewski H. Gender differences in protein kinase G-mediated vasorelaxation of rat aorta. Clin Sci (Lond.) 2001;100:473–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shaw L, Taggart M, Austin C. Effects of the oestrous cycle and gender on acute vasodilatory responses of isolated pressurized rat mesenteric arteries to 17 β-oestradiol. Br J Pharmacol 2001;132:1055–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Honda H, Unemoto T, Kogo H. Different mechanisms for testosterone-induced relaxation of aorta between normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1999;34:1232–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Skafar DF, Xu R, Morales J, Ram J, Sowers JR. Female sex hormones and cardiovascular disease in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:3913–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chambliss KL, Shaul PW. Estrogen modulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Endocr Rev 2002;23:665–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barron LA, Gren GM, Khalil RA. Gender differences in vascular smooth muscle reactivity to increases in extracellular sodium salt. Hypertension 2002;39;425–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatma Akar
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yasemin Manavbasi
    • 1
  • Ali Ihsan Parlar
    • 2
  • Ahmet Tulga Ulus
    • 2
  • Salih Fehmi Katircioglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of PharmacyGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryTürkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital Cardiovascular Surgery ClinicsAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Eczacılık Fakültesi, Farmakoloji Anabilim DalıGazi UniversitesiAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations