Long-term Pharmacological Activation of PPARγDoes not Prevent Left Ventricular Remodeling in Dogs with Advanced Heart Failure
- 85 Downloads
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) activators affect the myocardium through inhibition of inflammatory cytokines and metabolic modulation but their effect in the progression of heart failure is unclear. In the present study, we examined the effects of the PPARγ activator, GW347845 (GW), on the progression of heart failure.
Methods and results
Heart failure was produced in 21 dogs by intracoronary microembolizations to LV ejection fraction (EF) less than 30% and randomized to 3 months of therapy with high-dose GW (10 mg/Kg daily, n = 7), low-dose GW (3 mg/Kg daily, n = 7), or no therapy (control, n = 7). In control dogs, EF significantly decreased (28 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 1%, p < 0.001) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) increased during the 3 months of the follow-up period (64 ± 4 vs. 76 ± 5; p = 0.003, 46 ± 3 vs. 59 ± 4 ml, p = 0.002, respectively). In dogs treated with low-dose GW, EDV increased significantly (69 ± 4 vs.81 ± 5 ml, p = 0.01), whereas ESV remained statistically unchanged (50 ± 3 vs. 54 ± 3 ml, p = 0.10) resulting in modestly increased ejection fraction (27 ± 1 vs. 32 ± 3%, p = 0.05). In dogs treated with high-dose GW, both EDV and ESV increased (72 ± 4 vs. 79 ± 5 ml, p = 0.04; 53 ± 3 vs. 62 ± 5 ml, p = 0.04) and EF decreased (26 ± 1 vs. 23 ± 1%, p = 0.04) as with control dogs. There was significantly increased myocardial hypertrophy as evidenced by increased LV weight to body weight ratio and myocyte cross-section area in the GW treated animals compared to controls. Compared to control, treatment with GW had no effect on mRNA expression of PPARγ, inflammatory cytokines, stretch response proteins, or transcription factors that may induce hypertrophy
Long-term PPARγ activation with GW did not prevent progressive LV remodeling in dogs with advanced heart failure.
Key wordsheart failure remodeling drugs hemodynamics
Conflict of Interests
There are no conflicts to disclose.
- 15.Sabbah HN, Shimoyama H, Kono T, Gupta RC, Sharov VG, Scicli G, Levine TB, et al. Effects of long-term monotherapy with enalapril, metoprolol, and digoxin on the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and dilation in dogs with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation 1994;89:2852–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Grossman W: Pressure measurement. In: Grossman W, Baim DS editors. Cardiac catheterization, angiography, and intervention. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991. p. 123.Google Scholar
- 18.Liu Yh, Yang XP, Sharov VG, Nass O, Sabbah HN, Peterson E, et al. Effects of angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotension II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure. Role of kinins and angiotension II type 2 receptors. J Clin Invest 1997;99:1926–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Delerive P, Martin-Nizard F, Chinetti G, Trottein F, Fruchart JC, Najib J, et al. Peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor activators inhibit thrombin-induced endothelin-1 production in human vascular endothelial cells by inhibiting the activator protein-1 signaling pathway. Circ Res 1999;85:394–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Williams GD, Deldar A, Jordan WH, Gries C, Long GG, Dimarchi RD. Thiazolidinedione, Tanabe-174 (LY282449), in the rat and dog. Diabetes 1993;42 Suppl:59A.Google Scholar
- 37.Wooltron E. Rosiglitazone (Avandia) and pioglitazone (Actos) and heart failure. Can Medical Assoc J 2002;166:219.Google Scholar
- 38.Belcher GL, Michel JL. Tolerability profile of pioglitazone in combination with a sulfonyluria or metformin in controlled clinical trials. Diabetes 2001;49 Suppl 2:A416.Google Scholar
- 39.Aronoff SL. Adverse events with pioglitazone. Diabetes 2000;49 Suppl 1:A340.Google Scholar
- 45.Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:1279–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar