Different Effects of Adenosine and Calcium Channel Blockade on Myocardial No-Reflow after Acute Myocardial Infarction and Reperfusion
- 99 Downloads
Adenosine and calcium channel blockers have been used in the treatment of angiographic no-reflow directly after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, their effects on tissue perfusion after AMI and reperfusion are undefined. The present study was designed to compare the effect of adenosine with that of the calcium channel blockers diltiazem and verapamil on myocardial no-reflow.
Materials and methods
Coronary ligation area and area of no-reflow were determined with both myocardial contrast echocardiography in vivo and histopathological evaluation in 44 Yorkshire mini-swines randomized into five study groups: ten in control, eight in adenosine-treated, nine in diltiazem-treated, nine in verapamil-treated and eight in sham-operated. An acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion model was created with 3-h occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 1-h reperfusion.
Compared with the control group, adenosine significantly decreased the area of no-reflow measured with both methods from 78.5 and 82.3% to 20.7 and 21.5% of ligation area, respectively (both P < 0.01), reduced necrosis area, maintained VE-cadherin, β-catenin and γ-catenin levels in reflow myocardium (P < 0.05–0.01). Although diltiazem and verapamil also significantly decreased the area of no-reflow, they failed to significantly modify necrosis area, VE-cadherin, β-catenin and γ-catenin levels.
These findings support the concept that adenosine can reduce both structural and functional no-reflow, while calcium channel blockade can only reduce functional no-reflow.
Key wordsacute myocardial infarction no-reflow vasodilator adenosine calcium channel blockade reperfusion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 12.Kopecky SL, Aviles RJ, Bell MR, et al. A randomized double blinded placebo controlled, dose ranging study measuring the effect of an adenosine agonist on infarct size reduction in patients undergoing primary PTCA. The ADMIRE (AmP579 delivery for myocardial infarction Reduction) study. Am Heart J 2003;146:146–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Quintana M, Hjemdahl P, Sollevi A, et al. Left ventricular function and cardiovascular events following adjuvant therapy with adenosine in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis, results of the ATTenuation by Adenosine of Cardiac Complications (ATTACC) study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2003;59:1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mahaffey KW, Puma JA, Barbagelata NA, et al. Adenosine as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: the Acute Myocardial Infarction STudy of ADenosine (AMISTAD) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1711–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Yang Y, Li SQ, Peter B, et al. Effects of hypoxia on coronary flow reserve as determined by myocardial contrast echocardiography in swine. Chin Med J (Engl) 2004;117:1453–8.Google Scholar
- 24.Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The no-reflow phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest 1974;54:1498–508.Google Scholar