Advertisement

Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 129–140 | Cite as

Molecular pathology in real time

  • Aleš Ryška
Article

Abstract

With the development of sophisticated individualized therapeutic approaches, the role of pathology in classification of tumors is enormously increasing. The solely morphological characterization of neoplastic process is no more sufficient for qualified decision on optimal therapeutic approach. Thus, morphologic diagnosis must be supplemented by molecular analysis of the lesion with emphasis on the detection of status of certain markers used as predictive factors for targeted therapy. Both intrinsic and acquired types of intratumor heterogeneity have an impact at various moments of cancer diagnostics and therapy. The primary heterogeneity of neoplastic tissue represents a significant problem in patients, where only limited biopsy samples from the primary tumor are available for diagnosis, such as core needle biopsy specimens in breast cancer, transthoracic or endobronchial biopsies in lung cancer, or endoscopic biopsies in gastric cancer. Detection of predictive markers may be influenced by this heterogeneity, and the marker detection may be falsely negative or (less probably) falsely positive. In addition, as these markers are often detected in the tissue samples from primary tumor, the differences between molecular features of the primary lesion and its metastases may be responsible for failure of systemic therapy in patients with discordant phenotype between primary and metastatic disease. The fact of tumor heterogeneity must be taken into consideration already in establishing pathological diagnosis. One has to be aware that limited biopsy specimen must not always be fully representative of the entire tumor volume. To overcome these limitations, there does not exist one single simple solution. Examination of more tissue (preference of surgical resection specimens over biopsies, whenever possible), use of ultra-sensitive methods able to identify the minute subclones as a source of possible resistance to treatment, and detection of secondary molecular events from the circulating tumor cells or circulating cell-free DNA are potential solutions how to handle this issue.

Keywords

Tumor heterogeneity Evolution Liquid biopsy Limitation Molecular pathology Targeted therapy Predictive marker Resistance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the program PRVOUK P37/11, by the project LM2010004, and by grant of the Czech Ministry of Health IGA No. NT14150-3/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Burrell, R. A., & Swanton, C. (2014). Tumour heterogeneity and the evolution of polyclonal drug resistance. Molecular Oncology, 8(6), 1095–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.06.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swanton, C. (2012). Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time. Cancer Research, 72(19), 4875–4882. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2217.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerlinger, M., & Swanton, C. (2010). How Darwinian models inform therapeutic failure initiated by clonal heterogeneity in cancer medicine. British Journal of Cancer, 103(8), 1139–1143. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605912.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., et al. (2012). Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(10), 883–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sighoko, D., Liu, J., Hou, N., Gustafson, P., & Huo, D. (2014). Discordance in hormone receptor status among primary, metastatic, and second primary breast cancers: biological difference or misclassification? The Oncologist, 19(6), 592–601. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0427.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santinelli, A., Pisa, E., Stramazzotti, D., & Fabris, G. (2008). HER-2 status discrepancy between primary breast cancer and metastatic sites. Impact on target therapy. International Journal of Cancer, 122(5), 999–1004. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23051.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bachmann, C., Grischke, E. M., Fehm, T., Staebler, A., Schittenhelm, J., & Wallwiener, D. (2013). CNS metastases of breast cancer show discordant immunohistochemical phenotype compared to primary. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 139(4), 551–556. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1358-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Houssami, N., Macaskill, P., Balleine, R. L., Bilous, M., & Pegram, M. D. (2011). HER2 discordance between primary breast cancer and its paired metastasis: tumor biology or test artefact? Insights through meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 129(3), 659–674. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1632-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mittendorf, E. A., Wu, Y., Scaltriti, M., Meric-Bernstam, F., Hunt, K. K., Dawood, S., et al. (2009). Loss of HER2 amplification following trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy and survival outcomes. Clinical Cancer Research, 15(23), 7381–7388. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1735.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guarneri, V., Dieci, M. V., Barbieri, E., Piacentini, F., Omarini, C., Ficarra, G., et al. (2013). Loss of HER2 positivity and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Annals of Oncology, 24(12), 2990–2994. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sekido, Y., Umemura, S., Takekoshi, S., Suzuki, Y., Tokuda, Y., Tajima, T., et al. (2003). Heterogeneous gene alterations in primary breast cancer contribute to discordance between primary and asynchronous metastatic/recurrent sites: HER2 gene amplification and p53 mutation. International Journal of Oncology, 22(6), 1225–1232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aurilio, G., Disalvatore, D., Pruneri, G., Bagnardi, V., Viale, G., Curigliano, G., et al. (2014). A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases. European Journal of Cancer, 50(2), 277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalkman, S., Barentsz, M. W., & van Diest, P. J. (2014). The effects of under 6 hours of formalin fixation on hormone receptor and HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer: a systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 142(1), 16–22. doi: 10.1309/ajcp96ydqstybxwu.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khoury, T., Sait, S., Hwang, H., Chandrasekhar, R., Wilding, G., Tan, D., et al. (2009). Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers. Modern Pathology, 22(11), 1457–1467. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nofech-Mozes, S., Vella, E. T., Dhesy-Thind, S., Hagerty, K. L., Mangu, P. B., Temin, S., et al. (2012). Systematic review on hormone receptor testing in breast cancer. Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology, 20(3), 214–263. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e318234aa12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qiu, J., Kulkarni, S., Chandrasekhar, R., Rees, M., Hyde, K., Wilding, G., et al. (2010). Effect of delayed formalin fixation on estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: a study of three different clones. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 134(5), 813–819. doi: 10.1309/ajcpvcx83jwmsbno.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tong, L. C., Nelson, N., Tsourigiannis, J., & Mulligan, A. M. (2011). The effect of prolonged fixation on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 35(4), 545–552. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31820e6237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uy, G. B., Laudico, A. V., Carnate, J. M., Jr., Lim, F. G., Fernandez, A. M., Rivera, R. R., et al. (2010). Breast cancer hormone receptor assay results of core needle biopsy and modified radical mastectomy specimens from the same patients. Clinical Breast Cancer, 10(2), 154–159. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2010.n.021.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yildiz-Aktas, I. Z., Dabbs, D. J., & Bhargava, R. (2012). The effect of cold ischemic time on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast carcinoma. Modern Pathology, 25(8), 1098–1105. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, S. C., Ng, K. F., Lee, S. E., Chen, K. H., Yeh, T. S., & Chen, T. C. (2014). HER2 testing in paired biopsy and excision specimens of gastric cancer: the reliability of the scoring system and the clinicopathological factors relevant to discordance. Gastric Cancer. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0453-0.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bang, Y. J., Van Cutsem, E., Feyereislova, A., Chung, H. C., Shen, L., Sawaki, A., et al. (2010). Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 376(9742), 687–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan, B., Yau, E. X., Choo, S. N., Ong, C. W., Yong, K. J., Pang, B., et al. (2011). Dual-colour HER2/chromosome 17 chromogenic in situ hybridisation assay enables accurate assessment of HER2 genomic status in gastric cancer and has potential utility in HER2 testing of biopsy samples. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 64(10), 880–883. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ruschoff, J., Dietel, M., Baretton, G., Arbogast, S., Walch, A., Monges, G., et al. (2010). HER2 diagnostics in gastric cancer-guideline validation and development of standardized immunohistochemical testing. Virchows Archiv, 457(3), 299–307. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-0952-2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Warneke, V. S., Behrens, H. M., Boger, C., Becker, T., Lordick, F., Ebert, M. P., et al. (2013). Her2/neu testing in gastric cancer: evaluating the risk of sampling errors. Annals of Oncology, 24(3), 725–733. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds528.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watson, S., Validire, P., Cervera, P., Zorkani, N., Scriva, A., Lemay, F., et al. (2013). Combined HER2 analysis of biopsies and surgical specimens to optimize detection of trastuzumab-eligible patients in eso-gastric adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study. Annals of Oncology, 24(12), 3035–3039. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kimura, M., Tsuda, H., Morita, D., Shinto, E., Tanimoto, T., Ichikura, T., et al. (2005). Usefulness and limitation of multiple endoscopic biopsy sampling for epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB-2 testing in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(6), 324–331. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi089.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gumusay, O., Benekli, M., Ekinci, O., Baykara, M., Ozet, A., Coskun, U., et al. (2015). Discordances in HER2 status between primary gastric cancer and corresponding metastatic sites. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 45(5), 416–421. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Selcukbiricik, F., Erdamar, S., Buyukunal, E., Serrdengecti, S., & Demirelli, F. (2014). Is her-2 status in the primary tumor correlated with matched lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy? Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15(24), 10607–10611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yan, B., Yau, E. X., Bte Omar, S. S., Ong, C. W., Pang, B., Yeoh, K. G., et al. (2010). A study of HER2 gene amplification and protein expression in gastric cancer. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 63(9), 839–842. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.076570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liang, J. W., Zhang, J. J., Zhang, T., & Zheng, Z. C. (2014). Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of HER2 overexpression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of the literature. Tumour Biology, 35(5), 4849–4858. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1636-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gomez-Martin, C., Plaza, J. C., Pazo-Cid, R., Salud, A., Pons, F., Fonseca, P., et al. (2013). Level of HER2 gene amplification predicts response and overall survival in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(35), 4445–4452. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.9070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ieni, A., Barresi, V., Caltabiano, R., Caleo, A., Bonetti, L. R., Lanzafame, S., et al. (2014). Discordance rate of HER2 status in primary gastric carcinomas and synchronous lymph node metastases: a multicenter retrospective analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(12), 22331–22341. doi: 10.3390/ijms151222331.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Blanco-Calvo, M., Concha, A., Figueroa, A., Garrido, F., & Valladares-Ayerbes, M. (2015). Colorectal cancer classification and cell heterogeneity: a systems oncology approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(6), 13610–13632. doi: 10.3390/ijms160613610.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pino, M. S., & Chung, D. C. (2010). The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer. Gastroenterology, 138(6), 2059–2072. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.065.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leggett, B., & Whitehall, V. (2010). Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology, 138(6), 2088–2100. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pinheiro, M., Pinto, C., Peixoto, A., Veiga, I., Lopes, P., Henrique, R., et al. (2015). Target gene mutational pattern in Lynch syndrome colorectal carcinomas according to tumour location and germline mutation. British Journal of Cancer, 113(4), 686–692. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen, J., Etzel, C. J., Amos, C. I., Zhang, Q., Viscofsky, N., Lindor, N. M., et al. (2009). Genetic variants in the cell cycle control pathways contribute to early onset colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome. Cancer Causes & Control, 20(9), 1769–1777. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9416-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martin-Lopez, J. V., & Fishel, R. (2013). The mechanism of mismatch repair and the functional analysis of mismatch repair defects in Lynch syndrome. Familial Cancer, 12(2), 159–168. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9635-x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poulogiannis, G., Frayling, I. M., & Arends, M. J. (2010). DNA mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome. Histopathology, 56(2), 167–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03392.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barana, D., van der Klift, H., Wijnen, J., Longa, E. D., Radice, P., Cetto, G. L., et al. (2004). Spectrum of genetic alterations in Muir-Torre syndrome is the same as in HNPCC. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 125A(3), 318–319. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kruse, R., Rutten, A., Lamberti, C., Hosseiny-Malayeri, H. R., Wang, Y., Ruelfs, C., et al. (1998). Muir-Torre phenotype has a frequency of DNA mismatch-repair-gene mutations similar to that in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families defined by the Amsterdam criteria. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63(1), 63–70. doi: 10.1086/301926.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Suspiro, A., Fidalgo, P., Cravo, M., Albuquerque, C., Ramalho, E., Leitao, C. N., et al. (1998). The Muir-Torre syndrome: a rare variant of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer associated with hMSH2 mutation. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 93(9), 1572–1574. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00487.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bapat, B., Xia, L., Madlensky, L., Mitri, A., Tonin, P., Narod, S. A., et al. (1996). The genetic basis of Muir-Torre syndrome includes the hMLH1 locus. American Journal of Human Genetics, 59(3), 736–739.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kacerovska, D., Kazakov, D. V., Cerna, K., Hadravsky, L., Michal, M., Jr., Dostal, J., et al. (2010). Muir-Torre syndrome—a phenotypic variant of Lynch syndrome. Ceskoslovenská Patologie, 46(4), 86–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Greenson, J. K., Bonner, J. D., Ben-Yzhak, O., Cohen, H. I., Miselevich, I., Resnick, M. B., et al. (2003). Phenotype of microsatellite unstable colorectal carcinomas: well-differentiated and focally mucinous tumors and the absence of dirty necrosis correlate with microsatellite instability. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 27(5), 563–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kocarnik, J. M., Shiovitz, S., & Phipps, A. I. (2015). Molecular phenotypes of colorectal cancer and potential clinical applications. Gastroenterol Report (Oxf), 3(4), 269–276. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gov046.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lievre, A., Bachet, J. B., Boige, V., Cayre, A., Le Corre, D., Buc, E., et al. (2008). KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(3), 374–379. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.5906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lievre, A., Bachet, J. B., Le Corre, D., Boige, V., Landi, B., Emile, J. F., et al. (2006). KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Research, 66(8), 3992–3995. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schubbert, S., Shannon, K., & Bollag, G. (2007). Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nature Reviews. Cancer, 7(4), 295–308. doi: 10.1038/nrc2109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baas, J. M., Krens, L. L., Guchelaar, H. J., Morreau, H., & Gelderblom, H. (2011). Concordance of predictive markers for EGFR inhibitors in primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer: a review. The Oncologist, 16(9), 1239–1249. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0024.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vignot, S., Lefebvre, C., Frampton, G. M., Meurice, G., Yelensky, R., Palmer, G., et al. (2015). Comparative analysis of primary tumour and matched metastases in colorectal cancer patients: evaluation of concordance between genomic and transcriptional profiles. European Journal of Cancer, 51(7), 791–799. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Santini, D., Loupakis, F., Vincenzi, B., Floriani, I., Stasi, I., Canestrari, E., et al. (2008). High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. The Oncologist, 13(12), 1270–1275. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Siyar Ekinci, A., Demirci, U., Cakmak Oksuzoglu, B., Ozturk, A., Esbah, O., Ozatli, T., et al. (2015). KRAS discordance between primary and metastatic tumor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Journal of BUON, 20(1), 128–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Neumann, J., Wehweck, L., Maatz, S., Engel, J., Kirchner, T., & Jung, A. (2013). Alterations in the EGFR pathway coincide in colorectal cancer and impact on prognosis. Virchows Archiv, 463(4), 509–523. doi: 10.1007/s00428-013-1450-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cejas, P., Lopez-Gomez, M., Aguayo, C., Madero, R., Moreno-Rubio, J., de Castro Carpeno, J., et al. (2012). Analysis of the concordance in the EGFR pathway status between primary tumors and related metastases of colorectal cancer patients: implications for cancer therapy. Current Cancer Drug Targets, 12(2), 124–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Siravegna, G., Mussolin, B., Buscarino, M., Corti, G., Cassingena, A., Crisafulli, G., et al. (2015). Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Nature Medicine, 21(7), 795–801. doi: 10.1038/nm.3870.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Das, A., Kunkel, M., Joudeh, J., Dicker, D. T., Scicchitano, A., Allen, J. E., et al. (2015). Clinico-pathological correlation of serial measurement of circulating tumor cells in 24 metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy reveals interpatient heterogeneity correlated with CEA levels but independent of KRAS and BRAF mutation. Cancer Biology & Therapy, 16(5), 709–713. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1030555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lyberopoulou, A., Aravantinos, G., Efstathopoulos, E. P., Nikiteas, N., Bouziotis, P., Isaakidou, A., et al. (2015). Mutational analysis of circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer patients and correlation with primary tumor tissue. PLoS One, 10(4), e0123902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123902.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Raimondi, C., Nicolazzo, C., Gradilone, A., Giannini, G., De Falco, E., Chimenti, I., et al. (2014). Circulating tumor cells: exploring intratumor heterogeneity of colorectal cancer. Cancer Biology & Therapy, 15(5), 496–503. doi: 10.4161/cbt.28020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sequist, L. V., Heist, R. S., Shaw, A. T., Fidias, P., Rosovsky, R., Temel, J. S., et al. (2011). Implementing multiplexed genotyping of non-small-cell lung cancers into routine clinical practice. Annals of Oncology, 22(12), 2616–2624. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr489.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Popper, H. H., Ryska, A., Timar, J., & Olszewski, W. (2014). Molecular testing in lung cancer in the era of precision medicine. Translational Lung Cancer Research, 3(5), 291–300. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.10.01.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Travis, W. D., Brambilla, E., Nicholson, A. G., Yatabe, Y., Austin, J. H., Beasley, M. B., et al. (2015). The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 10(9), 1243–1260. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Popper, H. H., Timar, J., Ryska, A., & Olszewski, W. (2014). Minimal requirements for the molecular testing of lung cancer. Translational Lung Cancer Research, 3(5), 301–304. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.10.02.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Linardou, H., Dahabreh, I. J., Kanaloupiti, D., Siannis, F., Bafaloukos, D., Kosmidis, P., et al. (2008). Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. The Lancet Oncology, 9(10), 962–972. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70206-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Nguyen, K. S., Kobayashi, S., & Costa, D. B. (2009). Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancers dependent on the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. Clinical Lung Cancer, 10(4), 281–289. doi: 10.3816/CLC.2009.n.039.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Popat, S., Wotherspoon, A., Nutting, C. M., Gonzalez, D., Nicholson, A. G., & O’Brien, M. (2013). Transformation to “high grade” neuroendocrine carcinoma as an acquired drug resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer, 80(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.12.019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sequist, L. V., Waltman, B. A., Dias-Santagata, D., Digumarthy, S., Turke, A. B., Fidias, P., et al. (2011). Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Science Translational Medicine, 3(75), 75ra26. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Suda, K., Murakami, I., Sakai, K., Mizuuchi, H., Shimizu, S., Sato, K., et al. (2015). Small cell lung cancer transformation and T790M mutation: complimentary roles in acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Scientific Reports, 5, 14447. doi: 10.1038/srep14447.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Takezawa, K., Pirazzoli, V., Arcila, M. E., Nebhan, C. A., Song, X., de Stanchina, E., et al. (2012). HER2 amplification: a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancers that lack the second-site EGFRT790M mutation. Cancer Discovery, 2(10), 922–933. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tanizaki, J., Okamoto, I., Okabe, T., Sakai, K., Tanaka, K., Hayashi, H., et al. (2012). Activation of HER family signaling as a mechanism of acquired resistance to ALK inhibitors in EML4-ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 18(22), 6219–6226. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kobayashi, S., Boggon, T. J., Dayaram, T., Janne, P. A., Kocher, O., Meyerson, M., et al. (2005). EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(8), 786–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Pao, W., Miller, V. A., Politi, K. A., Riely, G. J., Somwar, R., Zakowski, M. F., et al. (2005). Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Medicine, 2(3), e73. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Maheswaran, S., Sequist, L. V., Nagrath, S., Ulkus, L., Brannigan, B., Collura, C. V., et al. (2008). Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(4), 366–377. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ohashi, K., Sequist, L. V., Arcila, M. E., Moran, T., Chmielecki, J., Lin, Y. L., et al. (2012). Lung cancers with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors occasionally harbor BRAF gene mutations but lack mutations in KRAS, NRAS, or MEK1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(31), E2127–2133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203530109.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Piotrowska, Z., Niederst, M. J., Karlovich, C. A., Wakelee, H. A., Neal, J. W., Mino-Kenudson, M., et al. (2015). Heterogeneity underlies the emergence of EGFRT790 wild-type clones following treatment of T790M-positive cancers with a third-generation EGFR inhibitor. Cancer Discovery, 5(7), 713–722. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0399.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sorensen, B. S., Wu, L., Wei, W., Tsai, J., Weber, B., Nexo, E., et al. (2014). Monitoring of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing and resistance mutations in the plasma DNA of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer during treatment with erlotinib. Cancer, 120(24), 3896–3901. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28964.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hata, A., Katakami, N., Yoshioka, H., Kaji, R., Masago, K., Fujita, S., et al. (2015). Spatiotemporal T790M heterogeneity in individual patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer after acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 10(11), 1553–1559. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Turke, A. B., Zejnullahu, K., Wu, Y. L., Song, Y., Dias-Santagata, D., Lifshits, E., et al. (2010). Preexistence and clonal selection of MET amplification in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Cancer Cell, 17(1), 77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.11.022.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Galluzzi, L., Vacchelli, E., Bravo-San Pedro, J. M., Buque, A., Senovilla, L., Baracco, E. E., et al. (2014). Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies. Oncotarget, 5(24), 12472–12508.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Garon, E. B., Rizvi, N. A., Hui, R., Leighl, N., Balmanoukian, A. S., Eder, J. P., et al. (2015). Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(21), 2018–2028. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ribas, A., Puzanov, I., Dummer, R., Schadendorf, D., Hamid, O., Robert, C., et al. (2015). Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 16(8), 908–918. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00083-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Larkin, J., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Gonzalez, R., Grob, J. J., Cowey, C. L., Lao, C. D., et al. (2015). Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(1), 23–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Postow, M. A., Chesney, J., Pavlick, A. C., Robert, C., Grossmann, K., McDermott, D., et al. (2015). Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(21), 2006–2017. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Robert, C., Schachter, J., Long, G. V., Arance, A., Grob, J. J., Mortier, L., et al. (2015). Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(26), 2521–2532. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wolchok, J. D., Kluger, H., Callahan, M. K., Postow, M. A., Rizvi, N. A., Lesokhin, A. M., et al. (2013). Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(2), 122–133. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Brtnicky, T., Fialova, A., Lastovicka, J., Rob, L., & Spisek, R. (2015). Clinical relevance of regulatory T cells monitoring in the peripheral blood of ovarian cancer patients. Human Immunology, 76(2–3), 187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.12.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Minarik, I., Lastovicka, J., Budinsky, V., Kayserova, J., Spisek, R., Jarolim, L., et al. (2013). Regulatory T cells, dendritic cells and neutrophils in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Immunology Letters, 152(2), 144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.05.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Xu, H., Mao, Y., Dai, Y., Wang, Q., & Zhang, X. (2009). CD4CD25+ regulatory T cells in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer treated with chemotherapy. Onkologie, 32(5), 246–252. doi: 10.1159/000210023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    McLaughlin, J., Han, G., Schalper, K. A., Carvajal-Hausdorf, D., Pelakanou, V., Rehman, J., et al. (2015). Quantitative assessment of the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncology. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3638. 1–9.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Teixido, C., Karachaliou, N., Gonzalez-Cao, M., Morales-Espinosa, D., & Rosell, R. (2015). Assays for predicting and monitoring responses to lung cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 12(2), 87–95. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0019.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ilie, M., Long-Mira, E., Bence, C., Butori, C., Lassalle, S., Bouhlel, L., et al. (2015). Comparative study of the PD-L1 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsies of NSCLC patients reveal major discordances: a potential issue for anti-PD-L1 therapeutic strategies. Annals of Oncology. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv489.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kerr, K. M., Tsao, M. S., Nicholson, A. G., Yatabe, Y., Wistuba, I. I., & Hirsch, F. R. (2015). Programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry in lung cancer: in what state is this art? Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 10(7), 985–989. doi: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bunger, S., Zimmermann, M., & Habermann, J. K. (2015). Diversity of assessing circulating tumor cells (CTCs) emphasizes need for standardization: a CTC Guide to design and report trials. Cancer Metastasis Reviews, 34(3), 527–545. doi: 10.1007/s10555-015-9582-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Freidin, M. B., Freydina, D. V., Leung, M., Montero Fernandez, A., Nicholson, A. G., & Lim, E. (2015). Circulating tumor DNA outperforms circulating tumor cells for KRAS mutation detection in thoracic malignancies. Clinical Chemistry, 61(10), 1299–1304. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.242453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Mostert, B., Jiang, Y., Sieuwerts, A. M., Wang, H., Bolt-de Vries, J., Biermann, K., et al. (2013). KRAS and BRAF mutation status in circulating colorectal tumor cells and their correlation with primary and metastatic tumor tissue. International Journal of Cancer, 133(1), 130–141. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Morgan, S. R., Whiteley, J., Donald, E., Smith, J., Eisenberg, M. T., Kallam, E., et al. (2012). Comparison of KRAS mutation assessment in tumor DNA and circulating free DNA in plasma and serum samples. Clinical Medicine Insights: Pathology, 5, 15–22. doi: 10.4137/CPath.S8798.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bettegowda, C., Sausen, M., Leary, R. J., Kinde, I., Wang, Y., Agrawal, N., et al. (2014). Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Science Translational Medicine, 6(224), 224ra224. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Akca, H., Demiray, A., Yaren, A., Bir, F., Koseler, A., Iwakawa, R., et al. (2013). Utility of serum DNA and pyrosequencing for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Genetics, 206(3), 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2013.01.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kim, H. R., Lee, S. Y., Hyun, D. S., Lee, M. K., Lee, H. K., Choi, C. M., et al. (2013). Detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA by PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 32(1), 50. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zhang, H., Liu, D., Li, S., Zheng, Y., Yang, X., Li, X., et al. (2013). Comparison of EGFR signaling pathway somatic DNA mutations derived from peripheral blood and corresponding tumor tissue of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer using liquidchip technology. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 15(6), 819–826. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.06.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Luo, J., Shen, L., & Zheng, D. (2014). Diagnostic value of circulating free DNA for the detection of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 4, 6269. doi: 10.1038/srep06269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Goto, K., Ichinose, Y., Ohe, Y., Yamamoto, N., Negoro, S., Nishio, K., et al. (2012). Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in circulating free DNA in serum: from IPASS, a phase III study of gefitinib or carboplatin/paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 7(1), 115–121. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307f98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Diaz, L. A., Jr., Williams, R. T., Wu, J., Kinde, I., Hecht, J. R., Berlin, J., et al. (2012). The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers. Nature, 486(7404), 537–540. doi: 10.1038/nature11219.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Olsson, E., Winter, C., George, A., Chen, Y., Howlin, J., Tang, M. H., et al. (2015). Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with primary breast cancer for detection of occult metastatic disease. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 7(8), 1034–1047. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404913.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sundaresan, T. K., Sequist, L. V., Heymach, J. V., Riely, G. J., Janne, P. A., Koch, W. H., et al. (2015). Detection of T790M, the acquired resistance EGFR mutation, by tumor biopsy versus noninvasive blood-based analyses. Clinical Cancer Research. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Jiang, T., Ren, S., & Zhou, C. (2015). Role of circulating-tumor DNA analysis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 90(2), 128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.09.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Marchetti, A., Palma, J. F., Felicioni, L., De Pas, T. M., Chiari, R., Del Grammastro, M., et al. (2015). Early prediction of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors by quantification of EGFR mutations in plasma of NSCLC patients. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 10(10), 1437–1443. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Thress, K. S., Paweletz, C. P., Felip, E., Cho, B. C., Stetson, D., Dougherty, B., et al. (2015). Acquired EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to AZD9291 in non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M. Nature Medicine, 21(6), 560–562. doi: 10.1038/nm.3854.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Nakamura, T., Sueoka-Aragane, N., Iwanaga, K., Sato, A., Komiya, K., Abe, T., et al. (2011). A noninvasive system for monitoring resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors with plasma DNA. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 6(10), 1639–1648. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822956e8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Francis, G., & Stein, S. (2015). Circulating cell-free tumour DNA in the management of cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(6), 14122–14142. doi: 10.3390/ijms160614122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Douillard, J. Y., Ostoros, G., Cobo, M., Ciuleanu, T., Cole, R., McWalter, G., et al. (2014). Gefitinib treatment in EGFR mutated Caucasian NSCLC: circulating-free tumor DNA as a surrogate for determination of EGFR status. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 9(9), 1345–1353. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000263.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Douillard, J. Y., Ostoros, G., Cobo, M., Ciuleanu, T., McCormack, R., Webster, A., et al. (2014). First-line gefitinib in Caucasian EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients: a phase-IV, open-label, single-arm study. British Journal of Cancer, 110(1), 55–62. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.721.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Fingerland Department of PathologyCharles University Medical Faculty HospitalHradec KrálovéCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations