Impact of surgical aortic valve replacement on global and regional longitudinal strain across four flow gradient patterns of severe aortic stenosis


To evaluate the impact of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) on global (GLS) and regional longitudinal strain (RLS) across four flow-gradient patterns of severe aortic stenosis (AS) 3 months after surgery. A total of 103 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area < 1.0 cm2) were examined by speckle tracking echocardiography the day before SAVR and at 3-months follow-up. Patients were stratified into four flow-gradient patterns by stroke volume index (>35 mL/m2 vs. ≤35 mL/m2) and mean transaortic gradients (>40 mmhg vs. ≤40 mmhg): normal-flow, high gradient (NF/HG); low-flow, high gradient (LF/HG); normal-flow, low gradient (NF/LG); low-flow, low gradient (LF/LG). Strain analysis comprised GLS and RLS at a basal (BLS), mid-ventricular (MLS) and apical level (ALS). Patients with high gradients improved GLS (NF/HG: 16.1 ± 3.5 % vs. 17.3 ± 3.4 %, p = 0.03 and LF/HG: 15.4 ± 3.6 % vs. 16.9 ± 3.1 %, p = 0.03), BLS (NF/HG: 12.7 ± 3.1 % vs. 14.2 ± 3.1 %, p = 0.003 and LF/HG: 11.4 ± 3.2 % vs. 13.8 ± 2.7 %, p = 0.005) and MLS (NF/HG: 15.4 ± 3.3 % vs. 16.5 ± 3.3 %, p = 0.04 and LF/HG: 14.5 ± 3.1 % vs. 16.2 ± 2.7 %, p = 0.01) whereas patients with low gradients showed no improvements three months after SAVR. ALS did not change significantly in any group. Patients with high gradients demonstrated a reduction in left ventricular (LV) mass index (p < 0.001) and N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide levels (p < 0.001) following SAVR in contrast to patients with low gradients. Patients with high gradient severe AS improve GLS and RLS three months after SAVR with concomitant reduction of LV mass and neurohormonal activation whereas patients with low gradients do not improve longitudinal strain, LV mass or neurohormonal activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Availability of data and material

Available on request.


  1. 1.

    Delgado V et al (2009) Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement. Eur Heart J 30(24):3037–3047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Weidemann F et al (2009) Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 120(7):577–584

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dahl JS et al (2012) Global strain in severe aortic valve stenosis: relation to clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(5):613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Baumgartner H et al (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38(36):2739–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carstensen HG et al (2016) Basal longitudinal strain predicts future aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17(3):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Collier P, Phelan D, Klein A (2017) A test in context: myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(8):1043–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Carstensen HG et al (2015) Association of ischemic heart disease to global and regional longitudinal strain in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31(3):485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B (2010) Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 31(3):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rost C et al (2010) Sequential changes in myocardial function after valve replacement for aortic stenosis by speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 11(7):584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Devereux RB, Lutas AD, Gottlieb EM, Campo GJ, Sachs E, Reichek I (1986) Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy comparison to necropsy finding. Am J Cardiol 7:450–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Briand M et al (2005) Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(2):291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Basford JR (2002) The Law of Laplace and its relevance to contemporary medicine and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(8):1165–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Adda J et al (2012) Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kocabay G et al (2014) Normal left ventricular mechanics by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Reference values in healthy adults. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 67(8):651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kadappu KK, Thomas L (2015) Tissue Doppler imaging in echocardiography: value and limitations. Heart Lung Circ 24(3):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hess OMV, Krayenbuehl B, Hans P (1993) Diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis. Circulation 87(5S):IV73-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Staron A et al (2012) Speckle tracking echocardiography derived 2-dimensional myocardial strain predicts left ventricular function and mass regression in aortic stenosis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(4):797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Carasso S et al (2011) Relation of myocardial mechanics in severe aortic stenosis to left ventricular ejection fraction and response to aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 107(7):1052–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Spethmann S et al (2014) Recovery of left ventricular and left atrial mechanics in various entities of aortic stenosis 12 months after TAVI. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(4):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Eleid MF et al (2013) Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation 128(16):1781–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lancellotti P et al (2012) Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(3):235–243

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Treibel TA et al (2018) Reverse myocardial remodeling following valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 71(8):860–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Clavel MA, Magne J, Pibarot P (2016) Low-gradient aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 37(34):2645–2657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chadha G et al (2019) Outcome of normal-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a propensity-matched study. J Am Heart Assoc 8(19):e012301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(19):1845–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Donal E et al (2009) Influence of afterload on left ventricular radial and longitudinal systolic functions: a two-dimensional strain imaging study. Eur J Echocardiogr 10(8):914–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Giannini C et al (2011) Early and late improvement of global and regional left ventricular function after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: an echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 1(3):264

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Triposkiadis F et al (2018) Left ventricular geometry as a major determinant of left ventricular ejection fraction: physiological considerations and clinical implications. Eur J Heart Fail 20(3):436–444

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Carter-Storch R et al (2019) End-systolic wall stress in aortic stenosis: comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Open Heart 6(1):e001021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kamperidis V et al (2014) Left ventricular functional recovery and remodeling in low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27(8):817–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    D’Andrea A et al (2019) Predictive value of left ventricular myocardial deformation for left ventricular remodeling in patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32(6):730–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhao LT et al (2020) Effect of pericardial incision on left ventricular morphology and systolic function in patients during coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 18(1):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Corrigan FE et al (2018) Mean aortic pressure gradient and global longitudinal strain recovery after transcatheter aortic valve replacement—a retrospective analysis. Hellenic J Cardiol 59(5):268–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lancellotti P et al (2010) Prognostic effect of long-axis left ventricular dysfunction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 105(3):383–388

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Fasth Grund.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the second Helsinki Declaration and approved by the local ethics committee.

Informed consent

All patients provided written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grund, F.F., Myhr, K.A., Visby, L. et al. Impact of surgical aortic valve replacement on global and regional longitudinal strain across four flow gradient patterns of severe aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2021).

Download citation


  • Aortic valve stenosis
  • Surgical aortic valve replacement
  • Regional longitudinal strain
  • Speckle tracking echocardiography
  • Global longitudinal strain