Value of speckle-tracking echocardiography changes in monitoring myocardial dysfunction during treatment of sepsis: potential prognostic implications

  • Mariana de Braga Lima Carvalho Canesso
  • Isabela Nascimento Borges
  • Thiago Adriano de Deus Queiroz Santos
  • Tijmen Hermen Ris
  • Marcio Vinicius Lins de Barros
  • Vandack Nobre
  • Maria Carmo Pereira NunesEmail author
Original Paper


Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) has been increasingly used for detection of sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction. However, the impact of strain changes during sepsis treatment has not been defined. This study assessed STE at admission and during the treatment of patients with sepsis to evaluate its changes as a potential factor for predicting in-hospital outcome. This study included 26 patients with sepsis who underwent STE echocardiography on day 1 and 7 during treatment. Myocardial deformation of both ventricles was assessed using global longitudinal strain. The endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The mean age was 51.4 ± 18.3 years, and 54% were female. The average SOFA score at T0 was 8.6 ± 3.8 points and at day 7 was 4.9 ± 4.7 points. The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction at baseline was 65.6 ± 9.1%, without changes in echocardiographic parameters during treatment. LV and RV longitudinal strain increased significantly in the patients who survived (− 18.8 ± 3.6 at D1 vs − 20.8 ± 2.5 at D7; p = 0.003; and − 21.3 ± 4.9 at D1 vs − 24.3 ± 5.8 at D7; p = 0.035, respectively), whereas strain values remained unchanged in those who died. After adjustment for the SOFA score, RV longitudinal strain at admission was associated with in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.760; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.591–0.977; p − 0.033]. STE improved significantly after the first week of treatment in patients with sepsis who survived compared with those patients who died during hospitalization. RV strain at admission predicted in-hospital mortality. An improvement in STE during sepsis treatment appears to be a useful tool for predicting in-hospital outcome.


Sepsis Cardiovascular function Speckle tracking echocardiography Longitudinal strain Ventricular function 



CNPq (Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development) partly supported the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Suffredini AF, Fromm RE, Parker MM, Brenner M, Kovacs JA, Wesley RA et al (1989) The cardiovascular response of normal humans to the administration of endotoxin. N Engl J Med 321:280–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vallabhajosyula S, Jentzer JC, Geske JB, Kumar M, Sakhuja A, Singhal A et al (2018) New-onset heart failure and mortality in hospital survivors of sepsis-related left ventricular dysfunction. Shock 49:144–149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vallabhajosyula S, Kumar M, Pandompatam G, Sakhuja A, Kashyap R, Kashani K et al (2017) Prognostic impact of isolated right ventricular dysfunction in sepsis and septic shock: an 8-year historical cohort study. Ann Intensiv Care 7:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vallabhajosyula S, Sakhuja A, Geske JB, Kumar M, Poterucha JT, Kashyap R et al (2017) Role of admission troponin-T and serial troponin-T testing in predicting outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock. J Am Heart Assoc 6Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pulido JN, Afessa B, Masaki M, Yuasa T, Gillespie S, Herasevich V et al (2012) Clinical spectrum, frequency, and significance of myocardial dysfunction in severe sepsis and septic shock. Mayo Clinic Proc 87:620–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kimchi A, Ellrodt AG, Berman DS, Riedinger MS, Swan HJ, Murata GH (1984) Right ventricular performance in septic shock: a combined radionuclide and hemodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 4:945–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang SJ, Nalos M, McLean AS (2013) Is early ventricular dysfunction or dilatation associated with lower mortality rate in adult severe sepsis and septic shock? A meta-analysis. Crit Care 17:R96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orde SR, Pulido JN, Masaki M, Gillespie S, Spoon JN, Kane GC et al (2014) Outcome prediction in sepsis: speckle tracking echocardiography based assessment of myocardial function. Crit Care 18:R149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalla K, Hallman C, Bech-Hanssen O, Haney M, Ricksten SE (2015) Strain echocardiography identifies impaired longitudinal systolic function in patients with septic shock and preserved ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 13:30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ng PY, Sin WC, Ng AK, Chan WM (2016) Speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with septic shock: a case control study (SPECKSS). Crit Care 20:145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palmieri V, Innocenti F, Guzzo A, Guerrini E, Vignaroli D, Pini R (2015) Left ventricular systolic longitudinal function as predictor of outcome in patients with sepsis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003865; discussion eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vallabhajosyula S, Rayes HA, Sakhuja A, Murad MH, Geske JB, Jentzer JC (2018) Global longitudinal strain using speckle-tracking echocardiography as a mortality predictor in sepsis: a systematic review. J Intensiv Care Med 885066618761750Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:801–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collier P, Phelan D, Klein A (2017) A test in context: myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:1043–1056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morris DA, Krisper M, Nakatani S, Kohncke C, Otsuji Y, Belyavskiy E et al (2017) Normal range and usefulness of right ventricular systolic strain to detect subtle right ventricular systolic abnormalities in patients with heart failure: a multicentre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:212–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang WT, Lee WH, Lee WT, Chen PS, Su YR, Liu PY et al (2015) Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is independently associated with mortality in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 41:1791–1799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shahul S, Gulati G, Hacker MR, Mahmood F, Canelli R, Nizamuddin J et al (2015) Detection of myocardial dysfunction in septic shock: a speckle-tracking echocardiography study. Anesth Analg 121:1547–1554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Innocenti F, Palmieri V, Guzzo A, Stefanone VT, Donnini C, Pini R (2018) SOFA score and left ventricular systolic function as predictors of short-term outcome in patients with sepsis. Intern Emerg Med 13:51–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaky A, Gill EA, Lin CP, Paul CP, Bendjelid K, Treggiari MM (2016) Characteristics of sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction using speckle-tracking echocardiography: a feasibility study. Anaesth Intensive Care 44:65–76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariana de Braga Lima Carvalho Canesso
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Isabela Nascimento Borges
    • 2
    • 5
  • Thiago Adriano de Deus Queiroz Santos
    • 2
  • Tijmen Hermen Ris
    • 3
  • Marcio Vinicius Lins de Barros
    • 4
  • Vandack Nobre
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Maria Carmo Pereira Nunes
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Postgraduate Course of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, School of MedicineUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Hospital das Clinicas, School of MedicineUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  3. 3.Erasmus University Rotterdam -Erasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Mater Dei HospitalBelo HorizonteBrazil
  5. 5.Núcleo Interdiciplinar de Investigação em Medicina Intensiva (NIIMI)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations