Skip to main content
Log in

Left atrial volume computed by 3D rotational angiography best predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Left atrium (LA) size is a well-studied predictor of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Yet, there is still little agreement on the best imaging technique to size the LA, and on the most appropriate sizing parameter. Volumetric assessment of LA with three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA LA volume index) might be a valid alternative to the commonly used transthoracic echocardiography (TTE LA volume index). The aim of our study was to investigate whether LA volume by 3DRA at the time of PVI is able to predict the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence. We analysed 352 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation referred for PVI to our Institution. In all patients, LA volume index (LAVI) was assessed by TTE and by 3DRA. Sinus rhythm was restored after PVI in 348 patients (99%). Average TTE-LAVI and 3DRA-LAVI were 37 ± 12 and 83 ± 18 ml/m2, respectively. At a median follow-up of 19 (12, 24) months, 27% of patients had AF recurrence after the first PVI. At the univariate analysis, persistent AF (p < 0.01), use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) (p < 0.05) and 3DRA-LAVI (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with AF recurrence. In contrast, none of the echocardiographic parameters considered, including TTE-LAVI, was associated with AF recurrence (p = 0.29). At the multivariate analysis, 3DRA-LAVI was the only independent predictor for AF recurrence (HR 1.01 [1.00–1.03], p = 0.017). Left atrial volume measured with 3DRA is superior to TTE assessment and to AF history in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after PVI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P, Agewall S, Camm J, Baron Esquivias G, Budts W, Carerj S, Casselman F, Coca A, De Caterina R, Deftereos S, Dobrev D, Ferro JM, Filippatos G, Fitzsimons D, Gorenek B, Guenoun M, Hohnloser SH, Kolh P, Lip GY, Manolis A, McMurray J, Ponikowski P, Rosenhek R, Ruschitzka F, Savelieva I, Sharma S, Suwalski P, Tamargo JL, Taylor CJ, Van Gelder IC, Voors AA, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zeppenfeld K (2016) ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 37(38):2893–2962. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunch TJ, Cutler MJ (2015) Is pulmonary vein isolation still the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation?. J Thorac Dis 7(2):132–141. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.12.46

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nery PB, Belliveau D, Nair GM, Bernick J, Redpath CJ, Szczotka A, Sadek MM, Green MS, Wells G, Birnie DH (2016) Relationship between pulmonary vein reconnection and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2(4):484–486. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2016.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoit BD (2014) Left atrial size and function: role in prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(6):493–505. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Potter T, Tavernier R, Devos D, Van Beeumen K, Duytschaever MJ (2009) Predictors of success after a first circumferential pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation 1(6):161

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsang TS, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME, Miyasaka Y, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Cha SS, Seward JB (2006) Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter?. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(5):1018–1023. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Potter T, Bardhaj G, Viggiano A, Morrice K, Geelen P (2014) Three-dimensional rotational angiography as a periprocedural imaging tool in atrial fibrillation ablation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 3(3):173–176. doi:10.15420/aer.2014.3.3.173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ector J, De Buck S, Nuyens D, Rossenbacker T, Huybrechts W, Gopal R et al (2009) Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole or rapid ventricular pacing to enhance three-dimensional rotational imaging during cardiac ablation procedures. Europace 11(6):751–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koka AR, Yau J, Van Why C, Cohen IS, Halpern EJ (2010) Underestimation of left atrial size measured with transthoracic echocardiography compared with 3D MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(5):W375–W381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olshansky B, Heller EN, Mitchell LB, Chandler M, Slater W, Green M et al (2005) Are transthoracic echocardiographic parameters associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence or stroke? Results from the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management (AFFIRM) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(12):2026–2033. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abecasis J, Dourado R, Ferreira A, Saraiva C, Cavaco D, Santos KR et al (2009) Left atrial volume calculated by multi-detector computed tomography may predict successful pulmonary vein isolation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 11(10):1289–1294. doi:10.1093/europace/eup198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Müller H, Burri H, Gentil P, Lerch R, Shah D (2010) Measurement of left atrial volume in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparison of angiography and electro-anatomic (CARTO) mapping with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Europace 12(6):792–797. doi:10.1093/europace/euq031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sohns C, Sohns JM, Vollmann D, Lüthje L, Bergau L, Dorenkamp M et al (2013) Left atrial volumetry from routine diagnostic work up prior to pulmonary vein ablation is a good predictor of freedom from atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14(7):684–691. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kriatselis C, Nedios S, Akrivakis S, Tang M, Roser M, Gerds-Li JH.et al (2011) Intraprocedural imaging of left atrium and pulmonary veins: a comparison study between rotational angiography and cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34(3):315–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom De Potter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strisciuglio, T., Di Gioia, G., Chatzikyriakou, S. et al. Left atrial volume computed by 3D rotational angiography best predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34, 337–342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1243-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1243-7

Keywords

Navigation