Heart deformation analysis: the distribution of regional myocardial motion patterns at left ventricle

  • Kai Lin
  • Leng Meng
  • Jeremy D. Collins
  • Varun Chowdhary
  • Michael Markl
  • James C. Carr
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that heart deformation analysis (HDA) is able to discriminate regional myocardial motion patterns on the left ventricle (LV). Totally 21 healthy volunteers (15 men and 6 women) without documented cardiovascular diseases were recruited. Cine MRI was performed on those subjects at four-chamber, two-chamber, and short-axis views. The variations of segmental myocardial motion indices of the LV, which were measured with the HDA tool, were investigated. Regional displacement, velocity, strain and strain rate were compared between lateral wall and septal wall using t tests. There are significant variations (CoV = 18.0–72.4%) of myocardial motion indices (average over 21 subjects) among 16 myocardial segments. There are significant differences (p < 0.05) between displacement, velocity, strain and strain rate measured at lateral and septal areas of the LV. In conclusion, HDA is able to present different regional LV motion patterns from multiple aspects in healthy volunteers.

Keywords

Heart deformation analysis MRI Myocardial motion pattern Variations 

Abbreviations

HDA

Heart deformation analysis

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

LVEF

Left ventricle ejection fraction

Drr

Radial displacement

Dcc

Circumferential displacement

Vrr

Radial velocity

Vcc

Circumferential velocity

Err

Radial strain

Ecc

Circumferential strain

Ess

Shear strain

SRr

Radial strain rate

SRc

Circumferential strain rate

Notes

Funding

This study is supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (R01HL117888 and K01HL121162).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The IRM approved this study.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Yan RT, Bluemke D, Gomes A et al (2011) Regional left ventricular myocardial dysfunction as a predictor of incident cardiovascular events MESA (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 57(17):1735–1744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cicala S, de Simone G, Roman MJ et al (2007) Prevalence and prognostic significance of wall-motion abnormalities in adults without clinically recognized cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation 116(2):143–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho GY, Marwick TH, Kim HS, Kim MK, Hong KS, Oh DJ (2009) Global 2-dimensional strain as a new prognosticator in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(7):618–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pearlman AS, Clark CE, Henry WL, Morganroth J, Itscoitz SB, Epstein SE (1976) Determinants of ventricular septal motion. Influence of relative right and left ventricular size. Circulation 54(1):83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynolds HR, Tunick PA, Grossi EA, Dilmanian H, Colvin SB, Kronzon I (2007) Paradoxical septal motion after cardiac surgery: a review of 3292 cases. Clin Cardiol 30(12):621–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmid P, Niederer P, Lunkenheimer PP, Torrent-Guasp F (1997) The anisotropic structure of the human left and right ventricles. Technol Health Care 5(1–2):29–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang H, Amini AA (2012) Cardiac motion and deformation recovery from MRI: a review. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31(2):487–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin K, Collins J, Chowdhary V, Markl M, Carr J (2016) Heart deformation analysis: measuring regional myocardial velocity with MR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(7):1103–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin K, Collins J, Lloyd-Jones D, Li D, Markl M, Carr J (2016) Automated assessment of left ventricular function and mass using heart deformation analysis: initial experience in 160 older adults. Acad Radiol 23(3):321–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin K, Meng L, Collins J, Fan Z, Markl M, Carr J (2016) Heart deformation analysis for automated quantification of cardiac function and regional myocardial motion patterns. Eur J Radiol 85(10):1811–1817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jolly M-P, Guetter C, Lu X, Xue H, Guehring J (2012) Automatic segmentation of the myocardium in cine MR images using deformable registration. Statistical atlases and computational models of the heart. Imaging Model Chall 7085:98–108Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guetter C, Xue H, Chefd’hotel C, Guehring J (2011) Efficient symmetric and inverse-consistent deformable registration through interleaved optimization. Biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, 2011 IEEE International Symposium, pp 4Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105(4):539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lutz A, Bornstedt A, Manzke R, Etyngier P, Nienhaus GU, Rasche V (2011) Acceleration of tissue phase mapping by k-t BLAST: a detailed analysis of the influence of k-t-BLAST for the quantification of myocardial motion at 3 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP (1988) Human heart: tagging with MR imaging–a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology 169(1):59–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jung B, Honal M, Ullmann P, Hennig J, Markl M (2008) Highly k-t-space-accelerated phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 60(5):1169–1177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi J, Tomasi C (1994) Good features to track. IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’94), pp 8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ceelen F, Hunter RJ, Boubertakh R et al (2013) Effect of atrial fibrillation ablation on myocardial function: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(8):1807–1817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morton G, Schuster A, Jogiya R, Kutty S, Beerbaum P, Nagel E (2012) Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu L, Germans T, Guclu A, Heymans MW, Allaart CP, van Rossum AC (2014) Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phatak NS, Maas SA, Veress AI, Pack NA, Di Bella EV, Weiss JA (2009) Strain measurement in the left ventricle during systole with deformable image registration. Med Image Anal 13(2):354–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boldea V, Sharp GC, Jiang SB, Sarrut D (2008) 4D-CT lung motion estimation with deformable registration: quantification of motion nonlinearity and hysteresis. Med Phys 35(3):1008–1018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stoylen A, Slordahl S, Skjelvan GK, Heimdal A, Skjaerpe T (2001) Strain rate imaging in normal and reduced diastolic function: comparison with pulsed Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14(4):264–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    LeWinter MM, Kent RS, Kroener JM, Carew TE, Covell JW (1975) Regional differences in myocardial performance in the left ventricle of the dog. Circ Res 37(2):191–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reiter U, Reiter G, Dorr K, Greiser A, Maderthaner R, Fuchsjager M (2014) Normal diastolic and systolic myocardial T1 values at 1.5-T MR imaging: correlations and blood normalization. Radiology 271(2):365–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kawel N, Nacif M, Zavodni A et al (2012) T1 mapping of the myocardium: intra-individual assessment of the effect of field strength, cardiac cycle and variation by myocardial region. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J et al (2009) Myocardial strain measurement with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: definition of normal range. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging 2(1):80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations