The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

, Volume 28, Issue 7, pp 1717–1724 | Cite as

Determination of acute vascular injury and edema in porcine carotid arteries by T2 weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance

  • Steen Fjord Pedersen
  • Won Yong Kim
  • William P. Paaske
  • Troels Thim
  • Erling Falk
  • Steffen Ringgaard
  • Samuel A. Thrysøe
Original paper


Inflammation plays an essential role for destabilization and rupture of carotid atherosclerotic plaques causing embolic ischemic stroke. Inflammation of the vessel wall may result in the formation of edema. This study investigated whether edema in the carotid artery wall induced by acute balloon injury could be detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using a T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery sequence (T2-STIR). Edema was induced unilaterally by balloon injury in the carotid artery of six pigs. Four to nine days (average six) post injury, the carotid arteries were assessed by T2-STIR and multi-contrast weighted sequences. CMR images were matched to histopathology, validated against Evans blue, and correlated with the amount of fibrinogen in the arterial wall used as an edema marker. T2-STIR images showed that the carotid signal intensity (SI) divided by the sternocleid muscle SI of the injured carotid artery was on average 223% (P = 0.03) higher than that of the uninjured carotid artery. Using a threshold value of 4SD, T2-STIR detected edema in the vessel wall (i.e., hyperintense signal intensity) with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 75%. Agreement was observed between carotid artery wall hyperintense signal intensity and Evans blue uptake (X 2  = 17.1, P < 0.001). The relative signal intensity correlated in a linear fashion with the amount of fibrinogen detected by histopathology (ρ = 0.9, P < 0.001). None of the multi-contrast weighted sequences detected edema in the carotid artery with reasonable sensitivity or specificity. T2-STIR CMR allowed carotid artery wall edema detection and may therefore be a useful non-invasive diagnostic tool for determination of inflammatory activity in the carotid artery wall.


Carotid artery Inflammation Edema Cardiovascular magnetic resonance Stroke 



The work was made possible with grants from: Foundation of Aase and Ejnar Danielsen, Denmark; Foundation of Torben and Alice Frimodts, Denmark; Foundation of Civil Engineer Frode V. Nyegaard and Wife, Denmark; Foundation of the Hede Nielsens Family, Denmark. WYK was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Lipinski MJ, Frias JC, Amirbekian V et al (2009) Macrophage-specific lipid-based nanoparticles improve cardiac magnetic resonance detection and characterization of human atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(5):637–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korosoglou G, Weiss RG, Kedziorek DA et al (2008) Noninvasive detection of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaque in hyperlipidemic rabbits using “positive contrast” magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(6):483–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, Kolb S, Debatin JF (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation 103(3):415–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trivedi RA, Mallawarachi C, King-Im JM et al (2006) Identifying inflamed carotid plaques using in vivo USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to label plaque macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26(7):1601–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saito M, Shima C, Takagi M, Ogino M, Katori M, Majima M (2002) Enhanced exudation of fibrinogen into the perivascular space in acute inflammation triggered by neutrophil migration. Inflamm Res 51(7):324–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flamm SD, White RD, Hoffman GS (1998) The clinical application of ‘edema-weighted’ magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Takayasu’s arteritis. Int J Cardiol 66(Suppl 1):S151–S159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Narvaez J, Narvaez JA, Nolla JM, Sirvent E, Reina D, Valverde J (2005) Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: usefulness of vascular magnetic resonance imaging studies in the diagnosis of aortitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44(4):479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geiger J, Bley T, Uhl M, Frydrychowicz A, Langer M, Markl M (2010) Diagnostic value of T2-weighted imaging for the detection of superficial cranial artery inflammation in giant cell arteritis. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:470–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madsen KB, Egund N, Jurik AG (2010) Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences. J Rheumatol 37:393–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thim T, Hagensen MK, Bentzon JF, Falk E (2008) From vulnerable plaque to atherothrombosis. J Intern Med 263:506–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eitel I, Friedrich MG (2011) T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C (2002) Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106:1368–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitsumori LM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Cai J, Yuan C (2003) In vivo accuracy of multisequence MR imaging for identifying unstable fibrous caps in advanced human carotid plaques. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:410–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sadat U, Weerakkody RA, Bowden DJ et al (2009) Utility of high resolution MR imaging to assess carotid plaque morphology: a comparison of acute symptomatic, recently symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease. Atherosclerosis 207:434–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okamoto E, Couse T, De LH et al (2001) Perivascular inflammation after balloon angioplasty of porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 104:2228–2235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pedersen SF, Thrysoe SA, Paaske WP et al (2011) Determination of edema in porcine coronary arteries by T2 weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fry DL, Mahley RW, Weisgraber KH, Oh SY (1977) Simultaneous accumulation of Evans blue dye and albumin in the canine aortic wall. Am J Physiol 233:H66–H79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedman MH, Henderson JM, Aukerman JA, Clingan PA (2000) Effect of periodic alterations in shear on vascular macromolecular uptake. Biorheology 37:265–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chu HW, Kraft M, Rex MD, Martin RJ (2001) Evaluation of blood vessels and edema in the airways of asthma patients: regulation with clarithromycin treatment. Chest 120:416–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friedrich MG, Abdel-Aty H, Taylor A, Schulz-Menger J, Messroghli D, Dietz R (2008) The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1581–1587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang YQ, Sauthoff H, Herscovici P et al (2008) Angiopoietin-1 increases survival and reduces the development of lung edema induced by endotoxin administration in a murine model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 36:262–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lombardo A, Biasucci LM, Lanza GA et al (2004) Inflammation as a possible link between coronary and carotid plaque instability. Circulation 109:3158–3163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Falk E (2006) Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:C7–C12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E et al (2003) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation 108(14):1664–1672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Graebe M, Pedersen SF, Hojgaard L, Kjaer A, Sillesen H (2010) 18FDG PET and ultrasound echolucency in carotid artery plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steen Fjord Pedersen
    • 1
    • 3
  • Won Yong Kim
    • 2
    • 3
  • William P. Paaske
    • 1
  • Troels Thim
    • 2
  • Erling Falk
    • 2
  • Steffen Ringgaard
    • 3
  • Samuel A. Thrysøe
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular SurgeryAarhus University Hospital SkejbyAarhus NDenmark
  2. 2.Department of CardiologyAarhus University Hospital SkejbyAarhus NDenmark
  3. 3.MR-CenterAarhus University Hospital SkejbyAarhus NDenmark

Personalised recommendations