Automated versus manual segmentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque volume and components in CTA: associations with cardiovascular risk factors

  • Danijela Vukadinovic
  • Sietske Rozie
  • Marjon van Gils
  • Theo van Walsum
  • Rashindra Manniesing
  • Aad van der Lugt
  • Wiro J. Niessen
Original Paper


The purpose of this study was to validate automated atherosclerotic plaque measurements in carotid arteries from CT angiography (CTA). We present an automated method (three initialization points are required) to measure plaque components within the carotid vessel wall in CTA. Plaque components (calcifications, fibrous tissue, lipids) are determined by different ranges of Hounsfield Unit values within the vessel wall. On CTA scans of 40 symptomatic patients with atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery automatically segmented plaque volume, calcified, fibrous and lipid percentages were 0.97 ± 0.51 cm3, 10 ± 11%, 63 ± 10% and 25 ± 5%; while manual measurements by first observer were 0.95 ± 0.60 cm3, 14 ± 16%, 63 ± 13% and 21 ± 9%, respectively and manual measurement by second observer were 1.05 ± 0.75 cm3, 11 ± 12%, 61 ± 11% and 27 ± 10%. In 90 datasets, significant associations were found between age, gender, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking and previous cerebrovascular disease and plaque features. For both automated and manual measurements, significant associations were found between: age and calcium and fibrous tissue percentage; gender and plaque volume and lipid percentage; diabetes and calcium, smoking and plaque volume; previous cerebrovascular disease and plaque volume. Significant associations found only by the automated method were between age and plaque volume, hypercholesterolemia and plaque volume and diabetes and fibrous tissue percentage. Significant association found only by the manual method was between previous cerebrovascular disease and percentage of fibrous tissue. Automated analysis of plaque composition in the carotid arteries is comparable with the manual analysis and has the potential to replace it.


Carotid artery Atherosclerotic plaque Cardiovascular risk factors Multidetector CT angiography Automated segmentation 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Robins M, Baum HM (1981) The national survey of stroke: incidence. Stroke 12:I45–I57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325(7): 445–453Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ (1987) Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 316(22):1371–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP (2000) Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis on behalf of the European carotid surgery trialists’ collaborative group. Stroke 31(3):615–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Hands LJ, Walton J, Rothwell PM (2004) Histological correlates of carotid plaque surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging. Circulation 110(15):2190–2197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S et al (2003) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation 108:1664–1672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Takaya N, Chu B, Underhill H, Kerwin WS, Cai J, Ferguson MS, Yuan C (2007) The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR imaging for characterization and assessment. Radiology 244:64–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C (2002) Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106(11):1368–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Underhill H, Cai J, Tran N, Polissar NL, Isaac C, Ferguson MS, Garden GA, Cramer SC, Maravilla KR, Hashimoto B, Hatsukami TS (2006) Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with magnetic resonance imaging–initial results. Stroke 37:818–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan C et al (1998) Measurement of atherosclerotic carotid plaque size in vivo using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 98:2666–2671Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Weert TT, Ouhlous M, Meijering E, Zondervan PE, Hendriks JM, van Sambeek MRHM, Dippel DWJ, van der Lugt A (2006) In vivo characterization and quantification of atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26(10):2366–2372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nandalur KR, Hardie AD, Raghavan P, Schipper MJ, Baskurt E, Kramer CM (2007) Composition of the stable carotid plaque: insights from a multidetector computed tomography study of plaque volume. Stroke 38:935–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wintermark M, Jawadi SS, Rapp JH, Tihan T, Tong E, Glidden DV, Abedin S, Schaeffer S, Acevedo-Bolton G, Boudignon B, Orwoll B, Pan X, Saloner D (2008) High-resolution CT imaging of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:875–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Weert T, de Monye C, Meijering E, Booij R, Niessen WJ, Dippel DWJ, Van der Lugt A (2008) Assesment of atherosclerotic carotid plaque volume with multidetector computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:751–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, Majoie CB (2004) Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 35:2306–2312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Mikucki SA et al (1997) Juxtalumenal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 26:585–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Biasi GM, Froio A, Diethrich EB et al (2004) Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation 110:756–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miralles M, Merino J, Busto M et al (2006) Quantification and characterization of carotid calcium with multi-detector CT-angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:561–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuan C, Lin E, Millard J, Hwang JN (1999) Closed contour edge detection of blood vessel lumen and outer wall boundaries in black-blood MR images. Magn Reson Imaging 17(2):257–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adams GJ, Vick GW, Bordelon CB, Insull W, Morrisett JD (2002) An algorithm for quantifying advanced carotid artery artherosclerosis in humans using MRI and active contours. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging 4684:1448–1457Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adame IM, van der Geest RJ, Wasserman BA, Mohamed MA, Reiber JHC, Lelieveldt BPF (2004) Automatic segmentation and plaque characterization in atherosclerotic carotid artery MR images. MAGMA 16(5):227–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu F, Xu D, Ferguson MS, Chu B, Saam T, Takaya N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C, Kerwin WS (2006) Automated in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI with morphology-enhanced probability maps. Magn Reson Med 55:659–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang F, Holzapfel G, Schulze-Bauer C, Stollberger R, Thedens D, Bolinger L, Stoplen A, Sonka M (2003) Segmentation of wall and plaque in vitro vascular MR images. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:419–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kerwin W, Xu D, Liu F, Saam T, Underhill H, Takaya N, Chu B, Hatsukami T, Yuan C (2007) MRI of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque analysis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 18:371–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dey D, Cheng V, Slomka P, Nakazato R, Ramesh A, Gurudevan S, Germano G, Berman D (2009) Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(6):372–382. Novet al. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009 ‘Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiographyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klass O, Kleinhans S, Walker MJ, Olszewski M, Feuerlein S, Juchems M, Hoffmann MHK (2010) Coronary plaque imaging with 256-slice multidetector computed tomography: interobserver variability of volumetric lesion parameters with semiautomatic plaque analysis software. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26(6):711–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vukadinovic D, van Walsum T, Manniesing R, Rozie S, Hameeteman K, de Weert TT, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ (2010) Segmentation of the outer vessel wall of the common carotid artery in CTA. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:65–76Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manniesing R, Velthuis BK, van Leeuwen MS, van der Schaaf IC, van Laar PJ, Niessen WJ (2006) Level set based cerebral vasculature segmentation and diameter quantification in CT angiography. Med Image Anal 10(2):200–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Monye C, Cademartiri F, de Weert TT, Siepman DA, Dippel DW, van der Lugt A (2005) Sixteen-detector row CT angiography of carotid arteries: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a bolus chaser. Radiology 237:555–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vukadinovic D, van Walsum T, Rozie S, de Weert TT, Manniesing R, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ (2009) Carotid artery segmentation and plaque quantification in CTA. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging, 835–838Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rozie S, de Weert T, de Monye C, Homburg PJ, Tanghe HLJ, Dippel DWJ, van der Lugt A (2009) Atherosclerotic plaque volume and composition in symptomatic carotid arteries assessed with multidetector CT angiography; relationship with severity of stenosis and cardiovascular risk factor. Eur Radiol 19:2294–2301Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danijela Vukadinovic
    • 1
  • Sietske Rozie
    • 2
  • Marjon van Gils
    • 2
  • Theo van Walsum
    • 1
  • Rashindra Manniesing
    • 1
  • Aad van der Lugt
    • 2
  • Wiro J. Niessen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Biomedical Imaging Group, Departments of Medical Informatics and RadiologyErasmus MC—University Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyErasmus MC—University Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Applied SciencesDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations