Advertisement

Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 431–437 | Cite as

Influence of Duration of Mechanical Activation of Plant Material Pyrolysis Products on Thermal Stability of Moldable Multilayer Carbon Nanotubes

  • V. P. Reva
  • A. E. Filatenkov
  • Yu. N. Mansurov
  • V. G. Kuryavyi
CURRENT PROBLEMS
  • 63 Downloads

The influence of duration of mechanical activation of amorphous carbon produced by plant material pyrolysis on the morphology of moldable multilayer carbon nanotubes is studied. The maximum nanotube yield is observed when amorphous carbon is mechanically activated for 36 hours. The nanotube yield depends a great deal on the type of plant materials submitted to pyrolysis. It is demonstrated that prolonged mechanical activation of carbon composite in a vario-planetary mill leads to formation of aggregates consisting of multilayer nanotubes and amorphous carbon and to loss of thermal stability of nanotubes. This fact is responsible for the decrease in carbon nanotube content in products of vacuum annealing carried out for nanotube purification.

Keywords

plant material pyrolysis amorphous carbon mechanical activation carbon nanotubes vacuum annealing thermal stability 

Notes

This work was accomplished with the financial support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation in accordance with the provision P 218, agreement No. 02.G25.31.0035-225, dated 12.02.2013, between OAO Dal’nevostochnyi Zavod “Zvezda” (OJSC Far East Plant “Star”) and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

References

  1. 1.
    S. V. Mishchenko, Carbon Nanomaterials. Production, Properties, Application [in Russian], Mashinostorenie, Moscow (2008), p. 320.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. L. Buchachenko, Usp. Khim., 72, 419-437 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. V. Kozlov, Yu. G. Yanovskii, and Yu. N. Karnet, Structure and Properties of Disperse-Filled Polymer Composites: Fractal Analysis [in Russian], Alyanstransatom, Moscow (2008), p. 363.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. V. Onishchenko, V. P. Reva, V. V. Chakov, et al., Khim. Tv. Topl., No. 4, 46-51 (2013).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. V. Onishchenko and V. P. Reva, Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel, No. 2, 3-6 (2013).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. V. Onishchenko and V. P. Reva, Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel, No. 4, 3-6 (2013).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Russian Federation Patent 2509053.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. M. Balaklienko, E. N. Marmer, and S. A. Novozhilov, Al’ternat. Energ. Ekol., No. 10, 89-92 (2005).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wei Huang and Yao Wang, Carbon, 41, 2585-2590 (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Reva
    • 1
  • A. E. Filatenkov
    • 1
  • Yu. N. Mansurov
    • 1
  • V. G. Kuryavyi
    • 2
  1. 1.Far Eastern Federal UniversityVladivistokRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations