Skip to main content
Log in

Are driver’s licenses issued within 3 years of cancer diagnosis a valid source of BMI data?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Overweight and obesity are risk factors for several cancers; however, population-based cancer registries do not routinely collect data on body mass index (BMI). This study evaluated the utility of supplementing cancer registry data with BMI data derived from driver’s license records.

Methods

We linked self-reported height and weight data from driver’s license records to directly measured values, obtained via medical record abstraction, in a sample of 712 adult Iowa residents with cancer diagnosed during 2007–2012. Matched BMI values were subjected to a comprehensive evaluation of quantitative and categorical measures of agreement between data sources.

Results

Driver’s license issue dates preceded diagnosis dates in 60.7% of cases, with time lags ranging from 3.0 years pre-diagnosis to 2.9 years post-diagnosis. Statistical analysis of agreement between continuous BMI values and ordinal BMI categories yielded an overall intraclass correlation estimate of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77, 0.82) and an overall weighted kappa estimate of 0.63 (95% CI 0.59, 0.68), respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated reduced reliability among obesity-related cancers, particularly multiple myeloma, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Neither measurement order nor time lag significantly affected agreement between BMI values.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that self-reported driver’s license data provide a reasonable approximation of BMI, but are less precise than interview- and questionnaire-based methods. Furthermore, the degree of bias is seemingly unaffected by measurement order and time lag, but appears to become more pronounced as BMI itself increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL (2020) Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, no 360. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD

  2. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K (2016) Body fatness and cancer-viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 375(8):794–798

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung H, Siegel RL, Rosenberg PS, Jemal A (2019) Emerging cancer trends among young adults in the USA: analysis of a population-based cancer registry. Lancet Public Health 4(3):e137–e147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ (2003) Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 348(17):1625–1638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Earle ME, Mi MP (1988) Body size at different periods of life and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 128(1):137–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bisgard KM, Folsom AR, Hong CP, Sellers TA (1994) Mortality and cancer rates in nonrespondents to a prospective study of older women: 5-year follow-up. Am J Epidemiol 139(10):990–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warner EL, Fluchel M, Wright J, Sweeney C, Boucher KM, Fraser A, Smith KR, Stroup AM, Kinney AY, Kirchhoff AC (2014) A population-based study of childhood cancer survivors' body mass index. J Cancer Epidemiol 2014:531958

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B (2007) A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 8(4):307–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McAdams MA, Van Dam RM, Hu FB (2007) Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in US adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15(1):188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoong SL, Carey ML, D'Este C, Sanson-Fisher RW (2013) Agreement between self-reported and measured weight and height collected in general practice patients: a prospective study. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas J 3rd, Paulet M, Rajpura JR (2016) Consistency between self-reported and recorded values for clinical measures. Cardiol Res Pract 2016:4364761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Marchand L, Yoshizawa CN, Nomura AM (1988) Validation of body size information on driver's licenses. Am J Epidemiol 128(4):874–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ossiander EM, Emanuel I, O'Brien W, Malone K (2004) Driver's licenses as a source of data on height and weight. Econ Hum Biol 2(2):219–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program (2019) Patterns of care studies. https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/poc/. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  15. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2013) Rural-urban continuum codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva

  19. McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22(3):276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Allison DB, Nathan JS, Albu JB, Heymsfield SB, Duprat LJ, Pi-Sunyer FX (1998) Measurement challenges and other practical concerns when studying massively obese individuals. Int J Eat Disord 24(3):275–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nawaz H, Chan W, Abdulrahman M, Larson D, Katz DL (2001) Self-reported weight and height: implications for obesity research. Am J Prev Med 20(4):294–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ (2002) Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 5(4):561–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Islami F, Goding Sauer A, Miller KD, Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Jacobs EJ, McCullough ML, Patel AV, Ma J, Soerjomataram I, Flanders WD, Brawley OW, Gapstur SM, Jemal A (2018) Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 68(1):31–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part under National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Contract No. HHSN261201300020I (Task Order HHSN26100011) and by the University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center through NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA086862.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Brumm.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brumm, M.C., West, M.M., Lynch, C.F. et al. Are driver’s licenses issued within 3 years of cancer diagnosis a valid source of BMI data?. Cancer Causes Control 31, 777–786 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01318-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01318-9

Navigation