Skip to main content
Log in

A qualitative study of Realtor knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to radon health effects: implications for comprehensive cancer control

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, and radon exposure is the second leading risk factor. Fewer than 25% of existing U.S. homes have been tested for radon, and only 5–10% of new homes use some form of radon prevention.

Objective

This qualitative study sought to determine radon-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Realtors to inform cancer control activities at local and state levels.

Methods

We conducted focus groups with Realtors in four states to collect information about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding radon.

Results

Realtors reported obtaining information on radon in similar ways, being aware of radon and its characteristics, and dealing with radon issues as a normal part of home sales. Differences in attitudes toward testing varied across states. Realtors in states with radon policies generally expressed more positive attitudes toward testing than those in states without policies. Radon mitigation was identified as an added expense to buyers and sellers. Realtors cited concerns about the reliability and credibility of mitigation systems and installers.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that attitudes and practices vary among Realtors and that additional educational resources about radon as a cancer risk factor may be beneficial. When comprehensive cancer control programs update their plans, they may want to add objectives, strategies, or activities to reduce radon exposure and prevent lung cancer. These activities could include partnering with Realtors to improve their knowledge, attitudes, and practices about radon, as well as developing and distributing radon educational resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2017) United States cancer statistics: 1999–2014 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. https://nccd.cdc.gov/uscs/. Accessed 4 Oct 2017

  2. National Research Council (NRC) Committee on health risks of exposure to radon, board on radiation effects research (1999) Commission on life sciences, health effects of exposure to radon (BEIR VI). National Academies Press, Washington DC

  3. Samet JM, Avila-Tang E, Boffetta P, Hannan LM, Olivo-Marston S, Thun MJ et al (2009) Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors. Clin Cancer Res 15(18):5626–5645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lubin JH, Wang ZY, Boice JD, Xu JR,ZY, Blot WJ, Wang LD et al (2005) Risk of lung cancer and residential radon in China: pooled results of two studies. Int J Cancer 109:132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A, Barros-Dios JM, Baysson H, Bochicchio F, Deo H, Falk R, Forastiere F, Hakama M, Heid I, Kreienbrock L, Kreuzer M, Lagarde F, Mäkeläinen I, Muirhead C, Oberaigner W, Pershagen G, Ruano-Ravina A, Ruosteenoja E, Rosario AS, Tirmarche M, TomáBek L, Whitley E, Wichmann HE, Doll R (2005) Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case–control studies. Br Med J. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63 (Online Paper)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, Alavanja M, Catalan VS, Field RW, Klotz JB, Létourneau EG, Lynch CF, Lyon JI, Sandler DP, Schoenberg JB, Steck DJ, Stolwijk JA, Weinberg C, H.B. Wilcox (2005) Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: a combined analysis of 7 North American case-control studies. Epidemiology 16(2): 137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2013) Home buyers and sellers guide to radon. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-05/documents/hmbuygud.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2017

  8. HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) (2009) The surgeon general’s call to action to promote healthy homes. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  9. Angell WJ (2008) The US radon problem, policy, program and industry: achievements, challenges and strategies. Radiat Prot Dosim 130(1):8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) et al (2011) Protecting people and families from radon: a federal action plan for saving lives. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP). https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp/. Accessed 4 Oct 2017

  12. Neri A, Stewart SL, Angell W (2013) Radon control activities for lung cancer prevention in national comprehensive cancer control program plans, 2005–2011. Prev Chronic Dis 10:E132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Promising practices brief: how to reduce radon in homes (2018) https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/prevention/policies_practices/radon/. Web 2 Oct 2018

  14. Acree P, Puckett MC, Neri AJ (2017) Evaluating progress in radon control activities for lung cancer prevention in National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program Plans, 2011–2015. J Community Health 42(5):962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernard HR, Ryan GW (2009) Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Association of Realtors (2018) https://www.nar.realtor/. Web 2 Oct 2018

  17. ATLAS.ti. Qualitative Data Analysis. Version 6.2.28

  18. Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE (2005) Qualitative methods in public health. Jossey Bass Inc, San Francisco (this in the radon report)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Newbury Park

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kidd PS, Parshall MB (2000) Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Res 10(3):293–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Padgett DK (2008) Qualitative methods in social work research, vol 36. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, Pedersen OK (2013) Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociol Methods Res 42(3):294–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. National Association of Realtors. Realtor Technology Survey. https://www.nar.realtor/reports/2013-14-realtor-technology-survey. Web 2013

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Lung cancer. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/lung/index.htm. Accessed 27 June 2017

Download references

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnoosh Momin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Momin, B., McNaughton, C., Galanek, J.D. et al. A qualitative study of Realtor knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to radon health effects: implications for comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 29, 1249–1255 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1086-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1086-0

Keywords

Navigation