Breast cancer incidence in Mongolia
Data on international variation in breast cancer incidence may help to identify additional risk factors. Substantially lower breast cancer rates in Asia than in North America and Western Europe are established, but differences within Asia have been largely ignored despite heterogeneity in lifestyles and environments. Mongolia’s breast cancer experience is of interest because of its shared genetics but vastly different diet compared with other parts of Asia.
Age-standardized breast cancer incidence and mortality rates obtained from the International Association of Cancer Registries are presented for several Asian countries. Mongolian incidence rates obtained from its cancer registry describe incidence within the country.
Breast cancer incidence in Mongolia (age standardized 8.0/100,000) is almost a third of rates in China (21.6/100,000), and over five times that of Japan (42.7/100,000) and Russia (43.2/100,000). Rates within Mongolia appear to have increased slightly over the last decade and are higher in urban than rural areas (annual percentage increase of age-standardized rates from 1998 to 2005 was 3.60 and 2.57 %, respectively). The increase in breast cancer incidence with age plateaus at menopause, as in other Asian populations.
Mongolia’s low breast cancer incidence is of particular interest because of their unusual diet (primarily red meat and dairy) compared with other Asian countries. More intensive study of potential dietary, reproductive and lifestyle factors in Mongolia with comparison to other Asian populations may provide more clarity in what drives the international breast cancer rate differences.
KeywordsMongolia Breast cancer Urban–rural Asia International
We thank Ms. Narantuya Khad, senior officer and research fellow in the Public Health Sector Policy Research Unit of the Health Department, for her work at the Registry. This work was supported by the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2008) GLOBOCAN, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer,Lyon, France; 2010. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr
- 3.Doll R, Payne P, Waterhouse J (eds) (1966) Cancer incidence in five continents: a technical report. Springer, Berlin for UICCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Segi M (1960) Cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries (1950–57). Tohoku University School of Public Health, SendaiGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dulamsuren S (ed) Annual Health Report 2004: Health Indicators. Department for Health Statistics and Information, Mongolian Ministry of Health, National Center for Health Development, UlaanbaatarGoogle Scholar
- 6.Surveillance epidemiology and end results. World Standard Million. http://seer.cancer.gov
- 7.US Central Intelligence Agency (2008) World factbook, on-line, updated as of Oct 2008Google Scholar
- 16.Sandagdorj T, Sanjaajamts E, Tudev U, Oyunchimeg D, Ochir C, Roder D (2010) Cancer incidence and mortality in Mongolia—national registry data. Asia Pac J Cancer Prev 11:1509–1514Google Scholar
- 19.Epplein M, Zheng Y, Zheng W et al. (2010) Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival. J Clin Oncol (published online before print)Google Scholar
- 23.Batnasan N, Dorgojov Y (eds) Human Development Report 2003 Mongolia. Urban–rural disparities in Mongolia. United Nations Development Programme and the Government of MongoliaGoogle Scholar
- 25.United Nations Development Programme: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia (2007) Mongolian STEPS Survey on the prevalence of noncommunicable disease risk factors 2006. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- 26.Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Dietary energy supply [1994–1996] in East and Southeast AsiaGoogle Scholar
- 32.Riley NE (2004) China’s population: new trends and challenges. Popul Bull 59(2) (Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau)Google Scholar