Improved survival among patients with base of tongue and tonsil cancer in the United States
- 243 Downloads
To examine if survival has changed over the last 20 years in patients with base of tongue and tonsil cancers in the United States.
Using SEER data, we employed Kaplan–Meier method to draw survival curves and calculate survival rates, and estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HR).
From the 1980s to the 2000s, the 5-year overall survival rates statistically significantly improved by 100% from 25 to 51% among patients with one primary base of tongue cancer and 28–60% among those with one primary tonsil cancer (p values for trend <0.001). In addition, the 5-year cancer-specific survival improved by 222.4 and 276%, respectively, among two types of patients. Survival improvement was more pronounced among male patients than among female patients regardless of young or old age, while the improvement was generally consistent among patients with different tumor stages and treatment methods. In contrast, however, those patients with subsequent multiple cancers showed no improvement in overall survival over time.
The survival of patients with base of tongue and tonsil cancer has significantly improved over the last decades in the United States. Whether the improvement is associated with HPV infection, screening, or early detection is worthy to study in future.
KeywordsBase of tongue cancer Tonsil cancer Survival Time trend HPV
Drs. Yu and Schantz had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs. Yu and Schantz developed study concept and design, interpreted analytic results, and drafted the manuscript. Drs. Zhang and Hashibe criticized and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
- 20.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 17 Regs limited-use + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2008 Sub (1973–2006 varying), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2009, based on the November 2008 submission
- 25.Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W et al (eds) (2010) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2007, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2010
- 26.US Department of Health and Human Services (1994) Preventing tobacco use among young people: a report of the surgeon general. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking on Health, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2002) Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51:642–645Google Scholar
- 29.Cruz GD, Ostroff JS, Kumar JV, and Gajendra S (2005) Preventing and detecting oral cancer. Oral health care providers’ readiness to provide health behavior counseling and oral cancer examinations. J Am Dent Assoc 136:594–601. (quiz 681–682)Google Scholar
- 36.Pignon JP, Bourhis J, Domenge C, Designe L (2000) Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy on head and neck cancer. Lancet 355:949–955PubMedGoogle Scholar