Patterns of meat intake and risk of prostate cancer among African-Americans in a large prospective study
- 209 Downloads
Given the large racial differences in prostate cancer risk, further investigation of diet and prostate cancer is warranted among high-risk groups. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between type of meat intake and prostate cancer risk among African-American men.
In the large, prospective NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, we analyzed baseline (1995–1996) data from African-American participants, aged 50–71 years. Incident prostate cancer cases (n = 1,089) were identified through 2006. Dietary and risk factor data were ascertained by questionnaires administered at baseline. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) within intake quantiles.
Neither white nor processed meat intake was associated with prostate cancer, regardless of meat-cooking method. Red meats cooked at high temperatures were associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00–1.38 and HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.03–1.44, for the upper two intake tertiles). Intake of the heterocyclic amine (HCA), 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoxaline (DiMeIQx) was positively associated with prostate cancer (HR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.05–1.61, p = 0.02). No associations were observed for intake of other HCAs.
Red meats cooked at high temperatures were positively associated with prostate cancer risk among African-American men. Further studies are needed to replicate these findings.
KeywordsProstate cancer Cohort studies Diet Meat consumption Racial disparities Men
This research was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute. Cancer incidence data from the Atlanta metropolitan area were collected by the Georgia Center for Cancer Statistics, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University. Cancer incidence data from California were collected by the California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section. Cancer incidence data from the Detroit metropolitan area were collected by the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program, Community Health Administration, State of Michigan. The Florida cancer incidence data used in this report were collected by the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDC) under contract with the Florida Department of Health (FDOH). The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the FCDC or FDOH. Cancer incidence data from Louisiana were collected by the Louisiana Tumor Registry, Louisiana State University Medical Center in New Orleans. Cancer incidence data from New Jersey were collected by the New Jersey State Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services. Cancer incidence data from North Carolina were collected by the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence data from Pennsylvania were supplied by the Division of Health Statistics and Research, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. Cancer incidence data from Arizona were collected by the Arizona Cancer Registry, Division of Public Health Services, Arizona Department of Health Services. Cancer incidence data from Texas were collected by the Texas Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services. We are indebted to the participants in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study for their outstanding cooperation. We also thank Sigurd Hermansen and Kerry Grace Morrissey from Westat for study outcomes ascertainment and management and Leslie Carroll at Information Management Services for data support.
Conflict of interest
- 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. (2011) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(5):277–300 (Epub 07 Jul 2010)Google Scholar
- 4.Kant AK, Graubard BI, Kumanyika SK (2007) Trends in black-white differentials in dietary intakes of U.S. adults, 1971–2002. Am J Prev Med 32(4):264–272Google Scholar
- 6.Bovell-Benjamin A, Dawkins N, Pace R, Shikany JM (2010) Dietary consumption practices and cancer risk in African Americans in the rural South. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(3 Suppl):57–75Google Scholar
- 7.Sinha R, Park Y, Graubard BI, Leitzmann MF, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A et al. (2009) Meat and meat-related compounds and risk of prostate cancer in a large prospective cohort study in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 170(9):1165–1177Google Scholar
- 8.Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Harlan LC, Tangrea J, Hollenbeck AR et al (2001) Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions: the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 54(12):1119–1125 (Epub 18 Dec 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Michaud D, Midthune D, Hermansen S, Leitzmann M, Harlan L, Kipnis V et al (2005) Comparison of cancer registry case ascertainment with SEER estimates and self-reporting in a subset of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. J Regist Manag 32:70–77Google Scholar
- 10.American Joint Committee on Cancer (1997) Manual for staging of cancer, 5th edn. Lippincott-Raven, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH (1997) Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 65(4 Suppl):1220S-1228S; discussion 9S–31S (Epub 01 April 1997)Google Scholar
- 22.Tappel A (2007) Heme of consumed red meat can act as a catalyst of oxidative damage and could initiate colon, breast and prostate cancers, heart disease and other diseases. Med Hypotheses 68(3):562–564Google Scholar
- 23.Cross AJ, Pollock JR, Bingham SA (2003) Haem, not protein or inorganic iron, is responsible for endogenous intestinal N-nitrosation arising from red meat. Cancer Res 63(10):2358–2360 (Epub 17 May 2003)Google Scholar
- 24.Sinha R, Rothman N, Salmon CP, Knize MG, Brown ED, Swanson CA et al. (1998) Heterocyclic amine content in beef cooked by different methods to varying degrees of doneness and gravy made from meat drippings. Food Chem Toxicol 143(2):279–287Google Scholar
- 25.Sinha R, Rothman N. (1999) Role of well-done, grilled red meat, heterocyclic amines (HCAs) in the etiology of human cancer. Cancer Lett 189–194Google Scholar
- 26.Creton SK, Zhu H, Gooderham NJ (2007) The cooked meat carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine activates the extracellular signal regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cancer Res 67(23):11455–11462Google Scholar
- 27.Jagerstad M, Skog K (2005) Genotoxicity of heat-processed foods. Mutat Res 574(1–2):156–172Google Scholar
- 28.Koutros S, Berndt SI, Sinha R, Ma X, Chatterjee N, Alavanja MC et al. (2009) Xenobiotic metabolizing gene variants, dietary heterocyclic amine intake, and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 69(5):1877–1884Google Scholar
- 29.Felton JS, Knize MG, Wu RW, Colvin ME, Hatch FT, Malfatti MA (2007) Mutagenic potency of food-derived heterocyclic amines. Mutat Res 616(1–2):90–94Google Scholar
- 30.Shirai T, Cui L, Takahashi S, Futakuchi M, Asamoto M, Kato K et al. (1999) Carcinogenicity of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) in the rat prostate and induction of invasive carcinomas by subsequent treatment with testosterone propionate. Cancer Lett 143(2):217–221Google Scholar